Efc949694a31043bfce9ec86e8235cd7
0

STUDY: Adding fish oil reduces trig levels for high-carb/low-fat dieters??

by (970)
Updated September 16, 2014 at 7:15 PM
Created October 20, 2010 at 7:09 PM

Does anyone have access to the Journal of Nutrition to find out the details of this study? I smell a rat, a la T.C. Campbell!

http://weightlosstweets.com/2010/09/06/fish-oil-addition-to-diet-may-improve-cholesterol-cholesterol-information-produced-by-doctors-for-patients-experiencing-high-cholesterol-levels/

In particular, the abstract doesn't indicate if the high-fat SFA and MUFA diets included carbs, and the type of SFA they used.

Here's the abstract:

http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/abstract/140/9/1595?maxtoshow=&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=lopez-miranda&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT

Efc949694a31043bfce9ec86e8235cd7
970 · October 20, 2010 at 8:27 PM

All good points! My beef is with the lack of high-fat diet details (at least in the abstract). We've seen too many studies that wrongly indict SFA and, at the same time, elevate HC/LF diets. :-)

Efc949694a31043bfce9ec86e8235cd7
970 · October 20, 2010 at 8:20 PM

Yes, I'm of the same mindset. It really irks me how deceptive these "authoritative" studies are! FAT = CHOLESTEROL = BAD = RUBBISH!!

Total Views
845

Recent Activity
E35e3d76547b18096a59c90029e7e107

Last Activity
31D AGO

Followers
0

Get Free Paleo Recipes Instantly

2 Answers

E35e3d76547b18096a59c90029e7e107
1
15583 · October 20, 2010 at 8:19 PM

Why the scepticism? We know that omega 3 reduces triglyceride and improves cholesterol profile. Comparing a high-SFA without omega balance diet to a high carb diet with proper omega balance is clearly no indictment of high-SFA.

Also it might just be lax reporting, but the news article cites the (allegedly superior to saturated fat) high mono-unsaturated fat diet in terms of "monounsaturated fats (such as fish and olive oil)." If the MUFA diet contained fish, then it would obviously gain the same benefits by dint of better omega balance.

Also worth noting the fact that is common to so many of these "high fat/low fat" studies: the highest "high fat" diet is 38% fat and the SFA diet is 16% SFA, the "low fat" diet is 28% fat. If there were more than a 10% of calorie intake difference between fat/carb intakes, then perhaps the low fat diets would have needed more than 1.2g fish oil to pull out in front!

Efc949694a31043bfce9ec86e8235cd7
970 · October 20, 2010 at 8:27 PM

All good points! My beef is with the lack of high-fat diet details (at least in the abstract). We've seen too many studies that wrongly indict SFA and, at the same time, elevate HC/LF diets. :-)

100fd85230060e754fc13394eee6d6f1
0
18671 · October 20, 2010 at 8:03 PM

Unless it gives specifics to the contrary, I would always assume a high-fat diet means high fat + high carb.

Efc949694a31043bfce9ec86e8235cd7
970 · October 20, 2010 at 8:20 PM

Yes, I'm of the same mindset. It really irks me how deceptive these "authoritative" studies are! FAT = CHOLESTEROL = BAD = RUBBISH!!

Answer Question

Login to Your PaleoHacks Account