E3127c595ddd7b5badf7ea8e42f058d6
0

Are Quest Bars considered Paleo?

by (205)
Updated about 17 hours ago
Created October 13, 2011 at 12:12 AM

Hi

I have heard these bars are ok for those who follow a fairly strict paleo diet

http://www.questproteinbar.com/

Just wondering what experience people have had with them.

Have you found them a good meal replacement?

Do they make you crave more sugar?

Is the dairy in the whey in anyway detrimental if you are following strict no grain/no dairy paelo?

Thank you!

5e92edc5a180787a60a252a8232006e9
340 · September 13, 2012 at 5:25 AM

But who funded that study? The Sugar Assoc knows which side of the bread is buttered. They've been sponsoring studies like that on Stevia, Splenda, Aspartame, Sugar Alcohol, etc. The important thing here is to realize that individual responses to artifical sweeteners are highly variable. Most can tolerate them alright; but a few have severe reactions. The noisy minority always shuts out the silent majority. I have no problems with any of them. So do everyone that I know. But the ones I hear from are those with allergic reactions.

3c6b4eed18dc57f746755b698426e7c8
5132 · October 16, 2011 at 7:04 PM

If on the other hand, I were munching on something bland, I would hardly go through a bag. It's the combination of salt, spicyness, i.e., palatability, that seems to be almost manufactured. Somehow, I doubt that the ingredients are just fried pork skins and salt.

3c6b4eed18dc57f746755b698426e7c8
5132 · October 16, 2011 at 7:01 PM

I had a few bags lying around in my car and during those long afternoon stretches between lunch and supper, when I wouldn't be home, I would munch on a few, then a whole bag, then 2 bags. It's definitely hyperpalatable: it's a Paleo versionof Dorito's. Try a few when ur hungry -- u'll go through a bag quicky, and another bag. It's similar to Guyenet's "food reward" theory and I think more convincing is Seth Robert's "Shangri La Diet" -- in this case, not so much the smell but the taste: the salty taste just registers in your brain and u become addicted to it.

072fd69647b0e765bb4b11532569f16d
3717 · October 15, 2011 at 8:49 PM

Would you still eat regular meals or just freaking pork rinds? Wow. I like a few here and there but wouldn't ever find the whole bag to be appealing. Thanks for the info on the frying to you both. Might need to dig some up for the ballgames this afternoon.

3c6b4eed18dc57f746755b698426e7c8
5132 · October 15, 2011 at 6:37 PM

It initially felt filling when I had a few. But I bought 10 bags and left them around the house and I went through 3 bags in 1 day and 2 bags in 30 minutes. And when I ran out, I woudl drive 25 miles to the store to get some more (very few stores carry them). That tells you, it's definitely addictive and I decided I need to nip this pork crack rinds in the bud.

76c885d7d27e6c83542ea493ca866dcd
2178 · October 14, 2011 at 12:24 PM

I actually emailed them and asked in what they're fried. the response was that they're fried "in their own juices" -- pork fat. i seem to have the opposite response -- i feel stuffed after just a few. hmmm

77877f762c40637911396daa19b53094
78417 · October 14, 2011 at 2:50 AM

Great quote :) keep it up

3c6b4eed18dc57f746755b698426e7c8
5132 · October 13, 2011 at 8:10 PM

That's supposed to be pemmican. According to Loren Cordain, they cause atherosclerosis.

3c6b4eed18dc57f746755b698426e7c8
5132 · October 13, 2011 at 8:07 PM

Presumably they're fried in bacon grease (SaFA), so no PUFA nor trans fats. However, the problem is that they're just too HYPERPALATABLE. I thought only carb-rich snacks were like that; wrong, you can have HYPERPALATABLE 100% fat snacks. I would wolf down 4 bags in a day and that was 3200 kcal. Plus the fact that it's fried, which isn't as good as something steamed, boiled, broiled, or raw, no matter what it's fried in. If anyone wants to test "metabolic advantage" it's easy to do w/pork rinds. U'll realize that calories do matter, esp. if you go over 4,000 calories.

E639bc85fd42430285596434a6515ad5
2226 · October 13, 2011 at 8:06 PM

@tonysolo, I think it depends on the execution of each.

93ae9f2d376e5426e891a9b58d8302fa
2936 · October 13, 2011 at 7:14 PM

But they were chocolate-covered quail eggs with the creamy nougat center.

072fd69647b0e765bb4b11532569f16d
3717 · October 13, 2011 at 6:08 PM

I know it's not the point of this question, but I presume these are friend in an oil of some sort? Any clue what kind? I could use a calorie bump...

C2ad96801ec1e22d2bf62475b6e52751
1416 · October 13, 2011 at 5:54 PM

Which is worse, a protein bar or tired reenactment-inspired sarcasm?

3c6b4eed18dc57f746755b698426e7c8
5132 · October 13, 2011 at 2:04 PM

I used to pig out on Frito Lay's Baken ETS, since it has zero carbs, no artificial ingredients. However, it's 800 cal per bag and I'm not sated until I finish two. That's 1600 calories. My metabolic advantage, since I'm on a 150g carb diet, stops at 3500 calories, as I consume about 2400, sans pork rinds. I gained 5 lbs, all in the abdomen. The problem here is food reward: too addictive, too tasty, too oinky and too fried. Decided I just don't need them. http://www.fritolay.com/our-snacks/baken-ets-traditional.html

76c885d7d27e6c83542ea493ca866dcd
2178 · October 13, 2011 at 12:46 PM

curious about why you've given up pork rinds? I've just discovered them and have used them for a snack once a week or so.

218f4d92627e4289cc81178fce5b4d00
2933 · October 13, 2011 at 10:00 AM

are they the ones Jimmy moore peddles in his podcast for sponsorship?

Total Views
18.7K

Recent Activity
B6400137b7a50279de74a24a2e08ae7f

Last Activity
64D AGO

Followers
0

Get Free Paleo Recipes Instantly

11 Answers

A89f9751a97c3082802dc0bcbe4e9208
13
13983 · October 13, 2011 at 2:28 AM

Any food that's processed, like these are, is generally not considered paleo.

Anything with dairy, like these have, is not really considered paleo.

Anything with added sweeteners, like these have, is definitely not considered paleo.

Anything with legumes (peanuts), as these have, is absolutely not paleo.

These are NOT a meal replacement.

These are not paleo.

Ef4c5b09fdccf73be575d3a0c267fdd9
7
2544 · October 13, 2011 at 2:13 AM

This is the difference between low carb Paleo and Aktins .... Low carb paleo is about WHOLE FOOD. This why it is superior to aktins and works better. It's not just a diet, it's a lifestyle.

77877f762c40637911396daa19b53094
78417 · October 14, 2011 at 2:50 AM

Great quote :) keep it up

E5c7f14800c5992831f5c70fa746dc5c
5
12847 · October 13, 2011 at 12:45 AM

They are junk........

Ed71ab1c75c6a9bd217a599db0a3e117
3
25467 · October 13, 2011 at 1:52 AM

Not by me......

E639bc85fd42430285596434a6515ad5
2
2226 · October 13, 2011 at 4:30 PM

Our ancestors have been eating Quest Bars for hundreds of thousands of years.

No, wait, I'm thinking of quail eggs. Never mind.

E639bc85fd42430285596434a6515ad5
2226 · October 13, 2011 at 8:06 PM

@tonysolo, I think it depends on the execution of each.

93ae9f2d376e5426e891a9b58d8302fa
2936 · October 13, 2011 at 7:14 PM

But they were chocolate-covered quail eggs with the creamy nougat center.

C2ad96801ec1e22d2bf62475b6e52751
1416 · October 13, 2011 at 5:54 PM

Which is worse, a protein bar or tired reenactment-inspired sarcasm?

B6400137b7a50279de74a24a2e08ae7f
1
205 · September 13, 2012 at 1:32 AM

The sucralose is the biggest offender IMO. They claim it's the safest sweetener but an animal study by Duke showed otherwise and from an anecdotal standpoint, splenda makes me feel sick in ways that stevia & even erythritol never do.

"a Duke University study conducted on rats (funded by The Sugar Association[21]) shows that at sucralose consumption levels of 1.1 mg/kg (below the FDA 'safe' level) to 11 mg/kg, throughout a 12-week administration of Splenda exerted numerous adverse effects, including reduction in beneficial fecal microflora, increased fecal pH, and enhanced expression levels of P-gp, CYP3A4, and CYP2D1, which are known to limit the bioavailability of nutrients and orally administered drugs.[22]" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splenda

5e92edc5a180787a60a252a8232006e9
340 · September 13, 2012 at 5:25 AM

But who funded that study? The Sugar Assoc knows which side of the bread is buttered. They've been sponsoring studies like that on Stevia, Splenda, Aspartame, Sugar Alcohol, etc. The important thing here is to realize that individual responses to artifical sweeteners are highly variable. Most can tolerate them alright; but a few have severe reactions. The noisy minority always shuts out the silent majority. I have no problems with any of them. So do everyone that I know. But the ones I hear from are those with allergic reactions.

3c6b4eed18dc57f746755b698426e7c8
1
5132 · October 13, 2011 at 3:52 AM

Here is a better alternative:

Boil and mash some sweet potatoes.

Mix with some crushed Brazil nuts, unsweented cocoa powder, cinnamon, blueberries, and cranberries. Mix 1 tbsp of coconut oil or some coconut milk, and heat up in microwave.

Spray some Stevia powder or liquid Stevia. You basically have a sweet potato pie or a filling.

This is my dessert from now on, after giving up protein bars and pork rinds for good.

3c6b4eed18dc57f746755b698426e7c8
5132 · October 16, 2011 at 7:04 PM

If on the other hand, I were munching on something bland, I would hardly go through a bag. It's the combination of salt, spicyness, i.e., palatability, that seems to be almost manufactured. Somehow, I doubt that the ingredients are just fried pork skins and salt.

3c6b4eed18dc57f746755b698426e7c8
5132 · October 16, 2011 at 7:01 PM

I had a few bags lying around in my car and during those long afternoon stretches between lunch and supper, when I wouldn't be home, I would munch on a few, then a whole bag, then 2 bags. It's definitely hyperpalatable: it's a Paleo versionof Dorito's. Try a few when ur hungry -- u'll go through a bag quicky, and another bag. It's similar to Guyenet's "food reward" theory and I think more convincing is Seth Robert's "Shangri La Diet" -- in this case, not so much the smell but the taste: the salty taste just registers in your brain and u become addicted to it.

072fd69647b0e765bb4b11532569f16d
3717 · October 15, 2011 at 8:49 PM

Would you still eat regular meals or just freaking pork rinds? Wow. I like a few here and there but wouldn't ever find the whole bag to be appealing. Thanks for the info on the frying to you both. Might need to dig some up for the ballgames this afternoon.

3c6b4eed18dc57f746755b698426e7c8
5132 · October 15, 2011 at 6:37 PM

It initially felt filling when I had a few. But I bought 10 bags and left them around the house and I went through 3 bags in 1 day and 2 bags in 30 minutes. And when I ran out, I woudl drive 25 miles to the store to get some more (very few stores carry them). That tells you, it's definitely addictive and I decided I need to nip this pork crack rinds in the bud.

76c885d7d27e6c83542ea493ca866dcd
2178 · October 14, 2011 at 12:24 PM

I actually emailed them and asked in what they're fried. the response was that they're fried "in their own juices" -- pork fat. i seem to have the opposite response -- i feel stuffed after just a few. hmmm

3c6b4eed18dc57f746755b698426e7c8
5132 · October 13, 2011 at 8:07 PM

Presumably they're fried in bacon grease (SaFA), so no PUFA nor trans fats. However, the problem is that they're just too HYPERPALATABLE. I thought only carb-rich snacks were like that; wrong, you can have HYPERPALATABLE 100% fat snacks. I would wolf down 4 bags in a day and that was 3200 kcal. Plus the fact that it's fried, which isn't as good as something steamed, boiled, broiled, or raw, no matter what it's fried in. If anyone wants to test "metabolic advantage" it's easy to do w/pork rinds. U'll realize that calories do matter, esp. if you go over 4,000 calories.

072fd69647b0e765bb4b11532569f16d
3717 · October 13, 2011 at 6:08 PM

I know it's not the point of this question, but I presume these are friend in an oil of some sort? Any clue what kind? I could use a calorie bump...

3c6b4eed18dc57f746755b698426e7c8
5132 · October 13, 2011 at 2:04 PM

I used to pig out on Frito Lay's Baken ETS, since it has zero carbs, no artificial ingredients. However, it's 800 cal per bag and I'm not sated until I finish two. That's 1600 calories. My metabolic advantage, since I'm on a 150g carb diet, stops at 3500 calories, as I consume about 2400, sans pork rinds. I gained 5 lbs, all in the abdomen. The problem here is food reward: too addictive, too tasty, too oinky and too fried. Decided I just don't need them. http://www.fritolay.com/our-snacks/baken-ets-traditional.html

76c885d7d27e6c83542ea493ca866dcd
2178 · October 13, 2011 at 12:46 PM

curious about why you've given up pork rinds? I've just discovered them and have used them for a snack once a week or so.

C2ad96801ec1e22d2bf62475b6e52751
0
1416 · October 13, 2011 at 5:54 PM

Of course not, but don't worry, you're not missing much.

C6fabcde199b796d6969aae6956e324b
0
118 · October 13, 2011 at 5:23 PM

What about the Tanka Bar? http://www.tankabars.com/

I would love more variety in these, and a cheaper price. Maybe make some with Coconut, and dark chocolate bits (or nibs?) I am sure there are some other good ideas to make these a bit more, but less expensive than the buffalo.

3c6b4eed18dc57f746755b698426e7c8
5132 · October 13, 2011 at 8:10 PM

That's supposed to be pemmican. According to Loren Cordain, they cause atherosclerosis.

66974b2cb291799dcd661b7dec99a9e2
0
11111 · October 13, 2011 at 4:07 AM

Not paleo at all, but if you choose to eat them then you do. As I tell my son 'you better make sure the juice is worth the squeeze' ;)

Lots of people have given alternatives so I will share my 'energy bar' alternative: mix liquid coconut oil with shredded coconut and maybe some chopped dried cherries or other dried fruit or some chopped nuts, pour into a flat bottomed container, chill in fridge until solid, then cut into bite sized pieces, eat a few of these and in a few minutes great energy as your body burns the readily available good fat for energy.

76c885d7d27e6c83542ea493ca866dcd
0
2178 · October 13, 2011 at 12:17 AM

I don't eat them because of the sucralose. Someone on here said that there's a new sucralose-free version, but I haven't been able to find it. Even if sucralose-free, I'd question what they use to sweeten them now.

I think it's best to train your taste buds to not want that sweetness at all.

Answer Question

Login to Your PaleoHacks Account

Get Free Paleo Recipes