Blog

12

3

Paleo Women.

I came across a few sites that mention that women who are paleo are often not even close to being as lean as Paleo men.

Thoughts? Comments? Tips? Tricks?

flag
28 
I'm confused, why would women want to be as lean as men? Women's bodies naturally retain more fat mass for the sake of reproduction. – jj Mar 28 2012 at 17:01
5 
Yes JJ! We need to spread that word! – Rogue Nutritionist Mar 28 2012 at 17:39
1 
Menace..perhaps someone should ask you, what are your goals with regards to getting lean? and not just say "fat is for reproduction.." – Paleo4ever Mar 28 2012 at 17:48
6 
@Paleo4ever , perhaps telling MenaceDenis that she can get as lean as a man and here's steps A,B, and C is not healthy because it is generally an unrealistic goal for 98% of women, unless she is willing to sacrifice a certain portion of metabolic, bone, and YES reproductive health. Do you think that erectile dysfunction is a sign of ill health in men? Do you care whether or not that man is thinking of creating a child anytime soon? No, it is an important marker of health, and should be treated as such regardless of your reproductive present/future. – JeJ Mar 28 2012 at 19:55
6 
Meh. I think it's just that people have different body types. I would have to work HARD (and by work, I mean eat the worst of SAD, become totally sedentary, and drive my cortisol through the roof) to gain 10 pounds. I'm almost always around 19% and I have a normal cycle. If a woman's set point is at 25% body fat or 18% and she's got a normal cycle and other markers of health, then who cares? Regardless, women who are "as lean as [lean] Paleo men" are just not going to line up with those healthy parameters. Most of the men with visible, cut abs are going to be sub-12%, easily. – Blossom1 Mar 28 2012 at 21:36
show 1 more comment

16 Answers

26

alt text

Let's not make the mistake of comparing apples to oranges or pears or whatever as if they are the same. Trying to force one bodytype into the mold of another is where I think we get into trouble.

Ectomorphs and mesomorphs can sometimes couch potato their way into looking like an endomorph (but sometimes not), and endomorphs or mesomorphs, can sometimes starve themselves to look like ectomorphs (but again sometimes not).

Given good nutrition, enough but not too much exercise, and freedom from major health issues people will drift towards what is a healthy weight for their type and there is quite a bit of variety in body fat between the types.

alt text

Glamorous bathing beauties from days of yore. I see a fair amount of variety here. I think images like these are important for women to see.

link|flag
2 
GREAT point. One of the reasons the BMI chart is the bane of my existence- there are fundamentally different body types, assigned to you by genetics, and none of them are inherently "better" or "worse" than the others. Just because you're an A-cup with no hips doesn't mean that you are some non-fertile, unhealthy waif, just like having a some padding or voluptuousness does not make you a lazy, overweight lump. You gotta be real with yourself on what your body type is, or you risk being unrealistic and sorely disappointed. – JeJ Mar 28 2012 at 22:19
2 
YES! Exactly! I'm ecto with a pinch of meso but it took loads of tweaking to get that bit of meso to come out. When I started Paleo.. then CrossFit + lifting, I began to understand more about how my body, now with an actual physical name!, worked - my metabolism, and gaining weight. Focusing on calories - I eat alot, taking rests, and easy on cardio. That's when I started making gains. I'm definitely lean still but nicely muscled and womanly. Never should we be compared - it will never be apples to apples.. every body is different. – jesuisjuba - paleorepublic.com Mar 28 2012 at 22:19
1 
Love this! I am an ectomorph for sure. – Carly Mar 28 2012 at 22:26
3 
Yeah, I am textbook-mesomorph (that photo looks like a cartoon version of me), but being muscular with a little bit of stocky puts me well into the overweight range from my height, and leans sharply towards obese when I focus on weight lifting. Which is BS. Nobody is the same, and just taking a stroll down the street will tell you that. Ask my 50 yrold "obese" mom who still plays field hockey, mountain climbs every day, and runs marathons. Lesson: your body, no matter how different it looks from your neighbor, will always possess the ability to be healthy. – JeJ Mar 28 2012 at 23:32
2 
Yes! This is what I was driving at in my comment to the original question. I'm an ecto - it took depression, being almost totally sedentary, and eating crap from my university's express cafe every day to put on 10#. Over two years. However, I've always had a regular menstrual cycle, and it would be nuts for me to start thinking "oh, I'm not curvy enough - I'm so sadly not reproductively-fit looking - the paleo horror - I must gain fat!"...as much as it would be equally nuts for a natural mesomorph with healthy markers to try to do the opposite. – Blossom1 Mar 28 2012 at 23:58
show 2 more comments
25

Your answer is in your question.

I came across a few sites that mention that women who are paleo are often not even close to being as lean as Paleo men.

Like it or not, this is by design. The way I like to put it, is that a proper adherence to Paleo is about resetting your body to "factory defaults", so that things like digestion, skin/hair/nail health, obesity, and autoimmune disorders are rectified. Naturally, women have been shaped by evolution to not be as lean as men so they can sustain a healthy reproductive system, and another life within them (if they so choose).

Going beyond to the "hacking" phase of paleo is about tailoring it to specific goals such as the dieter's concept of the ideal body, athletic performance, cost, etc...

link|flag
I think one of the major sources of struggle is that fact that many women's "factory settings" are not in alignment with western society's standards of attractiveness. Commence decades of fighting with your body over those "last 10 lbs." It sucks when I think about the fact that I got way more attention from men when I was on a starvation diet and 15 lb thinner. It really messes with your head. I want to "own" my curves and be proud of my fertile body, but society doesn't seem to be on the same page, and I'm sick of getting passed over or rejected. – JeezLoise Mar 30 2012 at 15:24
2 
Well, when have you ever known Western Societies standards of ANYTHING to be on-the-mark? 150 years ago, and for probably five-hundred years prior to that, an obese woman was the pinnacle of affluence and considered sexy. It's unobtainium that Western Society chases, not "healthy" or "proper". – Joshua Apr 8 2012 at 16:31
24

I remember once I dated a really rather ignorant guy and he was bragging about his body fat was 10%. I told him mine was 22% and he was like "whoa, that is so fat, that is like, so surprising because you look really good." ಠ_ಠ

As someone already linked my blog above, all I can say is that fat has a purpose in women, which is fertility. It's also been discussed here quite extensively.

Also, here is my comment from BB's FB page, where I got into a discussion with a girl who enjoys getting her body to low body fat: ""Plus, how do we know we need to have a montly period anyway? Certainly paleo women from healthy cultures were not always having monthly periods." Yeah, because they were PREGNANT or LACTATING. Not because they were malnourished. I think it's great you have a recreational hobby of being lean, but this post is against portraying that as the ideal, rather than a hobby for a select group of women who happen to enjoy it as you do. When you start rationalizing amenorrhea, that's when it stops being a hobby and starts becoming dysfunctional. You have to be realistic about the costs and benefits of extreme leanness. Some women have low set points and can maintain their fertility and normal cycles even with low body fat, others can not. When you are in the tail ends of the bell curve for body fat in women, you have A LOT of variation."

So yeah, if you want to go that low, have fun, be aware of any signs of problems since not all women can get that low without wrecking their hormones, but don't pretend it has anything to do with evolutionary nutrition or paleo.

link|flag
Sorry Melissa -I had to link to your article. It was awesome!! – Senneth Mar 28 2012 at 17:51
Ha yeh, there is a lot of variation. I lose my period at 115lbs (5'4) but my sister has been 105lb and still menstruated. I have always had more hormone problems, maybe I just have a poorer tolerance to stressful situations. I'm sure my body fat when I'm amenorrheic is higher a good bit higher than 22%. I also thought I was too fat. Now I have seen sense and I'd rather have a bigger bum than I'd like and have my health to boot:) – eimearreclaimedhealth Apr 6 2012 at 21:01
18

Did you see this? http://ancestralizeme.com/2012/03/27/paleo-women-are-phat/ I was just discussing this in another arena, and I think it's time that we really get the word out that if health is our goal, women need more fat than men. And why would anything besides optimal health be our goal??? Striving for a lean body has gotten me in a lot of trouble in my past, and I am now simply striving for health. These two ideas will never be one and the same for me and my body. Mainstreaming women's REAL health sounds like a very exciting idea, yes?

link|flag
1 
Saw this article earlier today. Loved it. :) – DanielleO812 Mar 28 2012 at 18:12
9

I love Melissa's article on Hunt Gather Love. http://huntgatherlove.com/node/680

From eating paleo my body is doing what her's did, getting healthier and getting more womanly looking.

link|flag
5

"Breeding or not...what's good for the gonads is good for the girl. I don't think you can selectively choose to harm part of your health, and expect the rest of it to still be tip top. Nature is kind of a bitch too, you can work all day trying to get rid of your hiney, and voila, fat starts to migrate from your brain and bone marrow right back down to your behind, then you are depressed, you develop osteoporosis, and the pants you were hoping to fit into still don't zip...which I think judging from the plethora of boniva and antidepressant ads is the plight of modern women in a nutshell." – Happy Now 19 hours ago

This needs to be on a billboard somewhere... everywhere. I love it.

Anecdotally, my best friend is one of those people that will do something just to prove that she is capable. For instance, she ran a marathon after only a few weeks of training and finished. Then, for some crazy reason, she decided to train for a fitness competition. You know the type where women get down to sub 10 body fat, get super tan and model in front of judges? Well she is in her final days before the show and she is in absolute hell. She has been training for 6 months, on a super restrictive diet for more than 4 months, consisting mostly of lean protein and steamed veg.. with a little protein powder or oats mixed in when she is looking to party. For the past 2 weeks she has been experiencing extreme muscular pain so she went to see a neuromuscular therapist. Immediately he could see that she had a broken tail bone, 2 slipped disks and that her right hip sits 5 inches higher than her left. This is of course due to overtraining to get down to competition level. Not only that, but she is obviously extremely malnourished and her hormones are jacked. She is 6'4'' and weighs 154 pounds at this point... subsequently has not had a period in 3 months.

I realize this is an extreme situation, but... I do not see her as much different than the women at the gym that slog away on the stair master for hours on end, go home and nibble on some fat free pudding and wake up every day thinking they are fat and worthless. As soon as my bff starts to eat again all that weight is going to come back with a vengeance (thank goodness).. point here is really that yes, women naturally carry more fat than men.. it is a fact of biology. Why not embrace it rather than kill yourself to look like some wacky ideal in your probably depressed head?

link|flag
Maybe you could surprise your friend with a congratulations feast when she has finished with this goal, and invite her back to the world of the nourished. I wish her luck. Damn, I wish I could afford a billboard! I think even more than this, I'd just like to plaster the world with images of real women in swimsuits from the days before plastic surgery. Maybe someday when I have that little pastoral farm you can barely see from the freeway I'll paint this in giant letters so it can be seen from passers by much like the bible quotes and political rantings that dot the hillsides on road trips. – Happy Now Mar 30 2012 at 6:44
5

I guess it makes me sad that this issue keeps arising. I've loved the articles and reflections that have been surfacing on the interwebs, but I am sad that so much energy is being paid to what the body looks like by smart, interesting, capable women. I think it's one aspect of so many relevant parts of a person's well-being. Of course, I like to look in the mirror and like what I see, but I also want to be smart, interesting, fulfilled, happy, etc. and I hate how many women put thin or ripped or lean in front of so many other wonderful goals to have.

I get it, and I empathize, I'm just sorry about how much energy the quest for slim/lean can take away from other interesting and wonderful goals.

(stepping down off soapbox now).

link|flag
5

Hi there,

I am 25, yet childless, having some exercise occasionally (trying to do it 4 times a week). I'm on paleo for 1.5 year now. I do not think men are only attracted to skinny women. It is false. Everyone has diff. types. I am not skinny, I look fit. I have approx. 4kg plus on me. I had it lost when starting on paleo but saw no difference in the attraction of men towards me.

Here's the secret Ladies: Men are not attracted to body fat percentage. Men are attracted to confident women!!!

So just feel healthy and don't give a... Be paleo.

link|flag
Nice handle, too. :-) – misstenacity Dec 2 at 15:51
4

If you look at pictures of women who have had DEXA (dual x-ray absorptiometry) scans done corresponding to their pictures, it's obvious that women, for fans of all aesthetics except for Ms. Skeletor, are much more attractive and closer to fulfilling the tenets of those aesthetics than men at equal bodyfat percentages. That is only one reason why men-to-women is a bad comparison. Example: http://forums.lylemcdonald.com/showpost.php?s=d3d4df741daf179f24ff045fc1456135&p=154301&postcount=3715

alt text

She is at 19%, according to the scan, and not really my cup of Nuwara Eliya high orange broken pekoe. Everyone is different, of course, and she may be able to be this low in bodyfat and not have any health consequences. This also may be true at lower percentages--I'm not for discriminating against healthy low-BF women anymore than the opposite. I have sub-q (and likely visceral) abdominal fat even at 15% BF(though i'm not advocating for gut-acceptance in dudes--mine is a risk factor for all the metabolic diseases that have lowered, and shortened, quality of life for elderly males in my family)

link|flag
Man, further proof of body-diversity: I had 1% lower body fat than her and did not look anything like that! We all be holding our weight and muscles in different places!! I had, like, two abs, and my arms/shoulders were ginormous. – JeJ Mar 29 2012 at 1:23
yeah, i'm more familiar with the male examples but I think this is true across genders. Go further back into history, though, and there is less variation for both. – Nandalal_Rasiah Mar 29 2012 at 14:12
+1 for the tea geekery. :-) – jj Apr 9 2012 at 20:28
4

I've met a few women who follow a paleo diet and in general they look great. They have amazing skin, and look very healthy and happy. Albeit, not necessarily the "Cosmo covergirl." Women are designed to have a little more fat on them than the guys. It's normal. Much of the crazy notion women have they are too fat and always seem to have this need to become thinner is dangerous marketing. I had said on one of the other blogs I read where this same question came up. This is mostly all just the media telling the women they need to be skinny for whatever reason. The models in women's magazines are terrible. Most men don't even find them attractive. Don't believe me? Drop the cosmo and pick up a playboy. Those women are not pencil thin, I promise. And clearly men find them attractive. Drop the impossible media image, get it out of your head and embrace a little extra fat that women need!

link|flag
2 
Derek, you are my hero of the day ;) Thank you for a honest view into a men's mind. – Cavewoman Apr 7 2012 at 19:03
You're very welcome. I try to look at most everything in a practical/open mindset, and will hopefully keep it up. I hope it helped. – Derek Apr 7 2012 at 22:50
1 
Thanks Derek, but really? For many, many women, Playboy, in addition to, you know, ew, is just as much as an "impossible media image" as a high fashion show. Its really no better to promote the Playboy image than the fashion model image. Its just as unattainable for many women, and I think its pretty ridiculous for people to blather about how women should just relax, be healthy and bam, look like Kim Kardashian. – Celine Apr 10 2012 at 8:57
Kim Kardashian is definitely a very airbrushed genetic outlier, once again on the cover of most grocery isle magazine's geared towards women. I hardly think she counts, but even if she does she's a MUCH healthier looking (weight wise) woman than most cosmo models. And while you say "ew" to playboy, it is just helpful in the explanation here. The question brought forth is about weight and body image. Your personal qualms about looking at a naked women aside, it was just a place to prove that guys don't usually like super thin women. – Derek Apr 10 2012 at 10:05
1 
And I don't think it's at all ridiculous to think that women should just relax and be healthy and bam they get hot. Almost every paleo woman I've met looked very healthy and attractive (to me). I'm sure it didn't happen over night, but to think that it's "unattainable for many women" is a pretty big blanket statement. I would suggest it's very much the opposite, and most women are much hotter than their self-consciousness will allow them to admit. Especially when living paleo – Derek Apr 10 2012 at 10:09
show 1 more comment
3

So I have a follow up question. If fat helps for reproductive health in women, why does it not go away post menopause? If anything, it seems like women get even more likely to hold on to their fat post menopause, which doesn't make sense based upon this vision. Thoughts?

link|flag
2 
In Why Women Need Fat they explain it helps protect against infection and bone fractures. – Bread-Eating Beelzebub Mar 29 2012 at 3:01
2 
We still need estrogen for good overall health. Estrogen is produced in fatty tissue, so even though the uterus & ovaries stop producing it, there is a supply available. The more fat you have, the more estrogen you have. – Dragonfly Mar 29 2012 at 3:04
I've read some stuff indicating that it can provide a bit of a buffer in old age to and give us something to draw on as our digestive abilities decline, but then there are the KRON theorists too. I suspect it is very individualized and neither theory is definitive. – Happy Now Mar 29 2012 at 3:04
1 
HA, an interesting fact is that grandmothers are important for infant survival. Females create breastmilk out of stored fat (apparently particularly thigh fat). If the mother dies or loses her milk, even grandmothers can lactate. Lactation is governed by two pituitary hormones: prolactin and oxytocin. So even if you're older, an experienced woman can induce some lactation - the ability for older, mature moms/grandmas to do this is optimal to infant survival in harsh conditions. We monkeys are social critters who evolved to support our tribe - grandmas are a great invention for us here. – Wowza Mar 29 2012 at 6:02
During my doula training there were a number of older women in the class, many hadn't nursed a baby in decades, and holding a crying infant actually brought about the tingly feeling of a milk letdown reflex in two of them. – Happy Now Mar 30 2012 at 6:33
2

I think that the stock answer that of "fat for reproductive health" gets used here way too often.

Are we assuming that ALL WOMEN on here are simply after reproductive health? Is it not possible that some women who are Paleo have decided (heaven forbid) to not have children? Does that not allow them to be Paleo?

Also, is it not possible that some women are seeking other goals, ie. competition or perhaps having their optimal physique while still young and not even thinking about reproduction (YET)? (not saying that they shouldn't think of it for the future and be healthy now)

But i just think its so narrow minded to say "women should have fat because they are designed to have babies. the end"

There is a lot more perspectives, goals and views than that.

link|flag
26 
Whether a woman chooses to reproduce or not is beside the point entirely. Since women are designed to reproduce, our bodies have evolved to optimize anything that will contribute to healthy offspring. That is our nature, and we are therefore at our healthiest when we don't try to fight nature. – Rogue Nutritionist Mar 28 2012 at 17:50
9 
...for example, if a man's body fat % was tied to his sexual function, such that when he got too low, he was unable to have erections or ejaculate, would you just say "well maybe looking muscular is more impotant to him than having a sex life?" It's about looking to Mother Nature to tell us where our bodies should be, not a photoshopped image of a starving model in a fashion mag. – Renee Mar 28 2012 at 18:26
12 
I'm not having babies any time soon, but the fact is these systems in my body that are responsible for trying to make me an evolutionary-winning baby machine are trying to keep me as healthy as possible. I don't have to let them know I'm using that health to see the world or do whatever women are doing these days, I just have to acknowledge them and keep them in working order to support my own well-being. – Bread-Eating Beelzebub Mar 28 2012 at 18:31
12 
Breeding or not...what's good for the gonads is good for the girl. I don't think you can selectively choose to harm part of your health, and expect the rest of it to still be tip top. Nature is kind of a bitch too, you can work all day trying to get rid of your hiney, and voila, fat starts to migrate from your brain and bone marrow right back down to your behind, then you are depressed, you develop osteoporosis, and the pants you were hoping to fit into still don't zip...which I think judging from the plethora of boniva and antidepressant ads is the plight of modern women in a nutshell. – Happy Now Mar 28 2012 at 19:17
9 
It's worth pointing out here that research on the Female Athlete Triad indicates long term health problems (particularly around bone health & stress fractures) for women who maintain a very lean body... totally aside from any reproductive consequences. – jj Mar 28 2012 at 19:19
show 8 more comments
1

Is it possible for women to get as lean as men? Yes. Is it optimal? I would say in most cases, no. As jj commented, women's bodies retain more fat (and require more fat) for reproduction and child-bearing. Most women will settle at a higher body fat percentage than men, and pushing your body below that probably isn't too healthy.

link|flag
1

i did a hydrostatic dunk and got 17.2% and i definitely still have visible fat (inner thigs, hips, butt). i was shocked it was that low but my kettlebell trainers said they were at 14% and 15% and that it doesn't stop your period or anything like that. i was really skeptical of that but really wanted to believe that my body fat was that low.

is it that the tank underestimates body fat? they were so nonchalant about such low numbers.

link|flag
2 
Some people lose their period at that low, others don't. It depends on the woman. I figure...why take that risk if I've worked so hard to restore my cycles? Not worth it to me. – Bread-Eating Beelzebub Mar 28 2012 at 19:17
5 
I really depends on the person. I lost my period when I was 18% body fat, gained it back as soon as I hit 20%. I know girls that have lost their periods at lower than that, and even a few girls who lost it higher (on fellow rower lost her's below 23%, she usually didn't have one). If anyone says "it won't stop your period" they aren't telling truth- it doesn't stop THEIR period, and they don't know anything about your period. – JeJ Mar 28 2012 at 19:47
It's a bell curve with abnormalities (PCOS rates for example is higher in higher body fat women) at both ends and high amounts of variance there too. – Bread-Eating Beelzebub Mar 28 2012 at 20:37
1

"Beauty is not a woman. It’s a man’s idea of a woman." - Quentin Crisp on glamour

Let your unconscious mind sit and marinate in that for an hour or so while your grass-fed meats marinate in their own juices ;) and re-visit this question again.

We are visual beings and #'s, %'s, and all that other jazz assert our need to categorize our observations on a need-to-know basis. What you see is a spectrum of beauty in terms of what 'looks' and determines sexiness and health is a cocktail of social, cultural, and perhaps at this point in our evolutionary development: biological.

Health is wealth but if I can see the world through bacon-tinted glasses then forget the wealth, I'll just sit back and enjoy the view ;)

link|flag
0

As I study for my final exam in my human sexuality course, I think it's important to not forget that it is all about the waist-to-hip ratio! You can be at a higher body-fat with an ideal waist-to-hip ratio (0.7) and be viewed as more attractive than a women of lower body fat and have a higher waist-to-hip ratio (0.8, etc).

http://www.springerlink.com/content/n1781r3020218qtk/

link|flag

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.