Blog

15

2

From being on this site, it seems that the following items have magical powers:

Kerrygold butter, heavy cream, coconut products, bone broth, BACON, organ meats...

Which of these (or anything else not mentioned here) don't you like? What paleo "craze" do you NOT incorporate in your meals even though it can be a healthy part of your diet?

Hold on to your seats...I dislike bacon. It appears that I've committed a paleo sin. I've never liked it. I've only had conventional bacon in the past, but I find everything about the texture and taste gross:(. I don't like any form of bacon...extra crispy, crumbled, wrapped in anything...ECK.

flag
1 
Join the bacon heresy club. – Matt Mar 30 2012 at 5:13
1 
+1 for not loving bacon. – HA Mar 30 2012 at 5:50
2 
Love the (nitrite-free) bacon, but is it still bacon if I trim most the dangling fat BEFORE and AFTER it's slow cooked in an oven? – PaulaMend Mar 30 2012 at 6:41
1 
I can't eat bacon straight. I mostly dice up a slice or two and add it to soups or hashes for flavoring. – Lindsay Mar 30 2012 at 12:34
1 
MCTs from coconut oil come for the original ketogenic diet, used to treat epilepsy (1950s I think). They discovered that MCTs create much more ketone bodies than regular sat fats. Hence the obsession with coconut oil in paleo, because it helps transition to a ketogenic state, if your doing paleo low carb. Liver has more vitamins and amino acids than you will ever find in any multi- product. It really is a nutritional super food. Shame it tastes like crap though. – Jamie Jul 14 at 8:42
show 4 more comments

23 Answers

29

I don't understand why people make Paleo treats, cakes an pastries. It's like hey I've found the great simple eating plan, but I still want to eat all the crap it ate before, but because it's made from Paleo ingredients it's good for me. The high levels of Fat is another thing. If they look at the game animals we buy now, which would be similar to the games the Paleo peep hunted, they have very minimal fat. Somewhere near 3%. Paleo has lost its simplicity. If it hasire than 3 ingredients, don't eat it

link|flag
2 
I don't get the whole idea of "recipes" at all. If you have whole food, some spices, some veggies, just experiment and cook it up. But then our culture is currently really into all teh celebrity chef and competitive cooking stuff, so maybe that's it. People think it needs to be "gourmet" – gydle Mar 30 2012 at 11:09
13 
Gourmet food isn't strange at all from a paleo diet perspective if you're not doing paleo as a cult of food reenactment. – Alex Mar 30 2012 at 12:06
16 
Some people just like to cook! Nothing crazy about that. As far as paleo baked goods, sometimes you need a good substitute for muffins and cupcakes. I have little kids and I couldn't get away with serving bacon and avocado for a play date snack:) – twochickadeez Mar 30 2012 at 12:07
7 
Game animals are rich in fat, but you don't get those parts in stores. – Dean Mar 30 2012 at 14:23
5 
Paleo 2.0- Is baked nut flour better than wheat flour or cheddar bunnies or cupcakes from a mix? I think everyone just does the best they can. It's not worth it to me to have my kids feel left out or for me to be ostracized by other moms, so I'd rather make a paleo muffin. No big deal. FWIW, I think they are disgusting. – twochickadeez Mar 30 2012 at 23:23
show 7 more comments
25

  • the fear of fruit
  • the fear of starchy veggies
  • obsession with coconut products, even for people who likely never had it in their heritage
  • obsessive adding of a lot of extra fat to every meal -- there's no reason to pour straight up coconut oil over your meal.
  • obsessive counting of carb grams, even non-starchy veggies
  • obsessive manipulation of supplementation to reach "perfect" nourishment
  • obsessive focus on eating animal protein at every meal
  • feeling of superiority and condecension that can come through when talking about other people's eating habits.

i guess i don't love how many people still eat according to external cues instead of truly listening to their bodies and trying to understand what makes them feel their best. i essentially did all of the things above and meanwhile have realized that: fruit and tubers make my body feel good, coconut does not. counting carbs drives me mental. supplementation was expensive and actually didn't make a difference. my body doesn't want meat every meal, and it certainly doesn't want excessive amounts of fat. we tend to give a lot of our power away by taking on other people's beliefs about how to eat -- stop just following others' mandates! start thinking for yourself!

link|flag
1 
fantastic.. You said it so well.. I did really badly on low carb because I am hypothroid and fasting just gave me headaches. I was eating a piece of chicken the other day which tasted great and felt that I should dump a big bit of coconut oil on it. I am listening to my body more with paleo. I have realized that very little amounts of fructose give me a headache so I have had to buy a glucometer to figure things out for myself. Yes we need to tweak to perfection for ourselves and stop following blindly – MrsD Mar 30 2012 at 13:50
6 
The "carb" thing comes into play with many of us (such as myself). If not for being careful with carb intake, weight loss would be slow or non-existent. To each his/her own I say. I'm not offended by anyone's "opinion" on Paleo/Primal or whatever you want to call your "diet" (because that's what it is, a diet). Be proud that you can do/eat the way you want and feel/look better at the same time. Paleo on I say! ; ) – MotoMoto Mar 30 2012 at 15:50
motomoto, i'm not saying there aren't some people who are extremely sensitive to carbs. what bothers me is when people take CW and then replace it with other principles (even if paleo/primal) without actually considering their own body's reaction to the changes their making. i think too many people follow blindly the information they find on blogs, websites, books, simply because a supposed "expert" is saying that 'THIS' is the way. if you arrive at the conclusion that you're sensitive to carbs, and limit them for that reason: more power to you!!! – meret Mar 30 2012 at 16:08
1 
+1 for the repetitive word "obsession". – thhq Mar 30 2012 at 23:04
1 
@warren: i'm just always astonished by some of the questions that pop up on paleo hacks or other forums where it's clear that something is not working for the people that bring them up. examples like hair falling or massive binges since going low carb, or continuing to eat high fat despite gaining weight when weight loss is the goal, issues around food intolerances but the continued consumption of those foods because it is a "recommended" food. i think many of us wish that some expert has the answer for us and our health and diet, when the reality is that we have to do leg-work ourselves! – meret Mar 31 2012 at 18:51
show 4 more comments
20

eating HUGE amounts of fat just for the sake of it, even if that means eating more total calories than you probably need to

link|flag
3 
How do you know that people that eat a lot of fat are eating more total calories than they need? – Warren D Mar 30 2012 at 22:37
1 
Because of kindly Dr. A, the speed limit on fat was removed and you can eat it ad libitum. I fail to see a connection between this and ancestor diet, but it's engrained in paleo CW. – thhq Mar 30 2012 at 23:16
4 
So? Many people seem to do very well, eating a lot of fat. Are people really eating huge amounts of fat just for the sake of it? How come I don't know of anybody that does this? – Warren D Mar 30 2012 at 23:29
1 
Have you read Taubes - Why We Get Fat (short) and Good Calories, Bad Calories (longer version)? A calorie is not just a calorie. The body metabolizes different foods differently. There is a big difference in 800 calories from each of the following foods - meat/seafood, vegetables, starches, grains, legumes, fruits, nuts - not to mention unprocessed vs. less processed foods. – Lady_Arwen Apr 1 2012 at 15:59
1 
I ate huge amounts of fat, not for the sake of it, but because it made me feel good. All of it was coconut oil. My mental improves a lot with it. There's nothing wrong with eating tons of calories if you don't get fat from it and do well with it. In my case, I can eat >4000kcal and still remain lean. – Korion Apr 2 2012 at 10:06
16

Still don't get the obsession many Paleo folks have with Crossfit, lol. You do it, great! Not my thing, nor will it ever be (so, don't push it on me, plus I'm bigger than you so leave me alone, kidding, lol). I run into so many fanatical Paleo Crossfitters it's become quite comical. Time will show the numerous injuries and burnout Crossfit does to folks (especially those who are obsessive with it, I know a few burnouts/injured already). Others will continue moderate/aggressive routines and be fine (good for you). Just a fad IMO. Get your butt out there and just move (and move often) is my opinion (and add some strength training if you so desire).

As for eating habits (what people eat), I could care less. To each his/her own I say. If it works for you, by all means eat/ingest it. Bottom line, just stay away from a SAD diet ; ) Paleo on folks!

link|flag
2 
+1 about Crossfit obsession! – Pedrita Mar 30 2012 at 22:07
1 
I think most of the crossfit injuries are from "crossfitters" who don't actually have trainers / coaches / or the know-how to properly perform movements. That goes for all workout routines. I know many people who go into the gym with a "get-ripped" plan and end up hurting themselves. Some crossfitters can be pushy, but not all of us are! Either you like it or you don't. – Rene Mar 31 2012 at 11:22
Rene, very true. What I foresee with the explosion of interest in Crossfit (there are quite a few CF gyms in Northern CA), I see more and more emphasis on getting membership than emphasis on technique. My $.02. Not everyone is meant to deadlift, clean/press, etc, etc. If one likes that and feels better/reaps benefits from CF, by all means, rock on (and keep doing it) ; ) – MotoMoto Apr 2 2012 at 21:37
Any workout that requires a trainer is not a good workout in my opinion. – Roth Jun 22 2012 at 0:32
13

I don't get why so many get so defensive about their potatoes. Eat them! Enjoy them! Don't yell at me because I eat them less than you do and otherwise advocate a low carb approach for myself.

As much as I like coconut oil (I cook with it, use it for a dip with beef jerky, and occasionally put it in chai tea), I don't know about all the "mix this with coconut oil to make deodorant, use coconut oil as lube/face cream/shampoo/toothpaste/diaper ointment".

I eat 2-3 strips of bacon every day. I can't say that bacon is a wonderful food source, but it's a quick and non-filling (calorically equivalent to a small steak but in a smaller package) calorie dump when I need it. I understand this craze - a food that was labelled "bad" has been upgraded to "meh, you might can do better" on Paleo, so people approach it with semi-carte blanche.

I like bone broths - but don't necessarily feel they are any more a healing food than I am the Dali Lama. Nutritive and mentally calming, yes... wonderfood/superfood, meh.

Not into the megadosing of certain vitamins/minerals. I take a few things here/there (zinc/mag/b6 and cod liver oil), but unless countered with some sort of a deficiency, I don't think I feel it necessary.

And I might get some flack for this, but I really, truely do not understand when people say "I'm eating 1500 calories, and crossfitting 7 days a week, plus weightlifting in the evenings, and I run 17 miles every two days - why am I not losing weight?". Similar posts seem to pop up on PH every freaking day... and every time I read one I can feel the veins pop out on my forehead.

I kinda miss the "old school" paleo craze, pemmican. It doesn't get much press anymore. I might have to make some now...

link|flag
2 
Haha, I'm sort of the opposite to you with coconut oil: I like it for deodorant and toothpaste, but I don't like to eat it. I like bone broths because they are tasty, but didn't notice any difference from eating them, so I didn't get the hype, either. Then I started using bone broth (sans onion) for my dog when he gets D, and it is amazing. It cuts down what is usually a week of D down to a day or two, so I can understand the excitement more now. – Sara S. Mar 30 2012 at 13:46
+1 for your views on bacon. – DanielleO812 Mar 30 2012 at 16:38
Do people actually yell at you for not eating potatoes? – Warren D Mar 30 2012 at 23:31
Sara, what is "D" I am guessing diarrhea but not sure. I use bone broth on my old dog and she really thrives on it. – Julie Mar 31 2012 at 0:24
I just don't think it's the right season for pemmican yet. This year I'm gonna make it when going on holiday. – Korion Mar 31 2012 at 14:05
8

I don't get recipes. For me the whole point is you don't need a recipe, you just eat plain, unadulterated, simple, real, unprocessed food. Done. Give me a slab of meat/fish/chicken with veggies and I'm cool...

link|flag
You're so right! I've never liked following recipes, especially the amounts of the ingredients. I prefer just hearing of combinations, like which herb goes well with what. I guess I only need to know the basics (for example, I didn't know stock has to simmer for days), and the rest is just whatever I feel like. – Pedrita Mar 30 2012 at 22:16
4 
Recipes are fun. Food on some level is still about social gathering.For some who are in control and eat whole foods, why shouldn't they enjoy being creative with them? – Chelsea Mar 30 2012 at 22:34
Chelsea - maybe it's just me, but recipes somehow detract from the simplicity for me and add a window to add unnecessary and more likely damaging ingredients. Example - a friend of mine has a recipe for liver and onions that involves coating the liver in flour to fry. I just fry up liver and onions in coconut oil. Get the difference I'm talking about? Mine isn't a recipe, it's just liver and onions. Hers is a recipe that she follows slavishly, even though the flour is potentially damaging and unnecessary. – Gary Mar 31 2012 at 20:00
1 
My biggest point for recipes is a lot of people don't know how to cook very basic dishes. The simpler the dish, the more important the skill is behind it. I have eaten so many dishes that would have been worth the few minutes it would have taken to google how to cook that cut, or how to season properly, or how to skim a stew. So, my motto is recipes: use it the first time you cook something, or beware. Same goes in professional kitchens- except instead of a recipe you get guidance from a fellow cook. Similar principle. – JeJ Apr 1 2012 at 0:15
@Gary - that's a recipe, short and simple, but it's still a recipe :p – cerement Apr 2 2012 at 7:29
show 1 more comment
7

I'm taking a different avenue - I don't get why other people, ESP. Vegetarians and Vegans hate Paleo no matter how much I educate them on "we aren't eating meat 24-7." My diet is similar to a Vegan diet, just add eggs and some meat and remove the soy. I eat far more veggies than I do animals. Actually, I eat more veggies than any Vegan I know. I also happen to have more animals as pets than any Vegan I know. Are other Paleo crazies ruining it for us? I just don't get the deep hatred for Paleo peeps.

link|flag
1 
Vegans definitely see us as the enemy for some reason. I see myself as a vegan who eats meat as much as anything. My diet is plant-based, but they'd shit themselves to see two little of wild venison chops on a plate full of spinach, peppers, onions, and mushrooms. – Matt Mar 30 2012 at 14:32
By definition, vegans do not eat any animal products. Even if you're eating only a tiny quantity of meat, dairy, or eggs, vegans are going to have a problem with it. – Alex Mar 30 2012 at 14:51
2 
Ah, yes Vegans. You should see the face of local Vegans as I walk around my town with my "Carnivores Eat Vegans" shirt on, lol. You just gotta picture me (this big/stocky paleo eater) wearing this shirt. I've had a few approach me and express their dislike of my shirt and Paleo lifestyle. To that I usually ask them, "Hey, you gonna eat that" (usually they've had food or shakes of some type, lol!!). Love it! Had to share ; ) – MotoMoto Mar 30 2012 at 16:12
2 
I don't care if I'm hated by vegans but I must say that I am not aware of any vegans that hate me. The "them versus us" mentality is very cult like and should be avoided. – Warren D Mar 30 2012 at 23:19
2 
Just threaten to pull out some bacon. Bacon is the gateway meat. The first strip is free ... – cerement Apr 2 2012 at 7:32
show 2 more comments
6

Don't get coconut oil. It doesn't work for me. Being scared of fruit is really BS to me. Going without starchy veggies I don't understand.

link|flag
4 
I can't have starchy veggies -got the small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Those little buggers love starch!! – Senneth Mar 30 2012 at 20:30
1 
to many - fruit is just sugar on a branch- though not all fruit is the same. some berries are cool, cherries and the once a week apple in season but oranges are really junk food, so it may sound simple but bull shit it isn't, at least to the guys that developed Paleo. – pjnoir Mar 30 2012 at 20:38
All you really need to know about paleo is in a book or a blog. Nevermind ancestral living just follow Plan 9. – thhq Mar 30 2012 at 23:00
fruit is just sugar on a branch it's sugar and lots of other stuff, but what's so wrong with sugar in the right context? Paleo re-enactment is not cool anymore, didn't you notice? – Korion Mar 31 2012 at 14:08
6

asking permission to eat something on paleohacks - just eat it and your body will get back to you if you are serious about it, otherwise eat anything and wear a paleo T-Shirt and you are cool in a crowd.

link|flag
5

I don't get bone broth or organ meats. I've never tried either of them, and I'd like to, but it seems like they must be more trouble than they're worth!

link|flag
5 
organ meats are just as easy to cook as muscle meats – Jeff Mar 30 2012 at 5:48
How many organ meats can there be in the world? If everyone wanted organs to eat, there would be a shortage. – PaulaMend Mar 30 2012 at 6:43
3 
I don't get bone broth either, but I gotta admit I see differences when I eat organ meat and bone broth regularly. If everyone wanted organs to eat. As if that's ever gonna happen, Paula. My butcher's assistent even asked someone else to cut the liver when I asked her for it. And when my mum eats liver, my whole family is disgusted. – Korion Mar 30 2012 at 8:03
eat them and pay attention to how you feel you'll be amazed – jake Mar 30 2012 at 14:20
Organ meats creep me out too. I just can't get past the whole idea of them. I did, however, recently make my first batch of bone broth and actually liked it. Never know until you try! (actually saying this to myself, too!) – DanielleO812 Mar 30 2012 at 16:35
show 1 more comment
4

where do I begin? Can't tolerate coconut milk (thank you fodmaps), don't like the taste/feel of most fats, and have particular trouble with animal fats, don't like meat, and am totally skeeved by organ meats (other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the show?)

If left to my own devices, I'd get 100% of my calories from sugar and mainline diet coke. Unfortunately for my natural preferences, I do best on a high protein, high veg diet, so I mostly follow the paleo plan of eating, but it's definitely not natural for me.

link|flag
4

  • Bone broth - I don't think there's anything magic in there. It's good for a soup base and that's about it.
  • Gelatin - It's a bunch of non-essential amino acids...
  • Coconut oil - For its own sake, coconut oil is wacky. Now, cook with it and it's a fine fat to use.
  • Bacon - (in all things). A little bit of bacon now and then is perfectly fine, probably don't eat more than half a pound a month (and only that much because that's how I packaged them when we butchered the pig). I scratch my head how some folks eat 2-3 pounds per person per week!
link|flag
4

That to some it seems to be more about muscles/looks than about health.

link|flag
3 
Some people don't give health much thought because they don't suffer any health problems. – Warren D Mar 30 2012 at 23:36
I agree or understand that it happens, since I think some people can be healthy enough and live well enough. But I also think getting sick would happen eventually to most people not following a healthy diet, and that it would be natural to care about health above other things. Also, sometimes we seem/look healthy when we are actually starting to develop some health issues. – Pedrita Mar 31 2012 at 10:24
So a healthy twenty-something that wants to get fit and gain some muscle should really be on here posting questions about particular health problems that they don't have? – Warren D Mar 31 2012 at 16:33
No, I didn't say anything about having to ask questions about health, or not to ask about muscles. I don't think you have to have any health problems in order to want to be (stay) healthy and care more about it. Perhaps I think this way because I see everyone getting unhealthy (aging included) everyday, just at different rates. – Pedrita Mar 31 2012 at 20:28
3

Nothing wrong with not being keen on bacon! Me, I grew up Muslim, so pork is something I know nothing about (but would like to try). But whenever I smell it I feel funny because of the association that pig is bad and dirty.

I don't really get marrow. I don't know how to prepare it, that's probably why, but I'm still overcoming the ick factor. I get my marrow in my bone broth in liquified form, but I can only slurp out little bits that come attached to my lamb chops and even then I feel a bit queasy...

I also can't stomach heart or kidney, again because I grew up in a culture that is totally close-minded and somehow favours neat, packaged slabs of muscle meat completely removed from its origin. I know people get so grossed out when we talk about organ meats partly because it reminds them that meat actually came from a creature.

I think avocados are gross too. I tend to dislike most kinds of 'plant fat', unless it's coconut oil, and only when that's used to cook an animal product.

link|flag
2 
I also associate bacon with being "dirty". I think it's because it's a food I used to be so fearful of and I still haven't gotten over it. I'm fine and dandy and all with fats...but the entire crisp nature of bacon kind of freaks me out. I grew up in an opposite culture where we eat EVERYTHING...kidneys, livers, hearts, fish eyeball goo :), jellyfish, sea slugs, tripe, etc. etc. My mom once asked if it was illegal in America to eat duck eggs from a random nest at the park, to give you an idea of how I grew up. Thus, nothing much grosses me out in terms of parts of an animal. – Sunny Beaches Mar 30 2012 at 5:29
1 
I LOVE BACON!!! – AnarchyCaveman Mar 30 2012 at 5:35
1 
That's awesome, Sunny! I envy you so much. I'm still trying to get over this irrational fear of the foods that have the potential to be the most nourishing. But most days it's easier just to go for the ground beef and lamb chops -_- – Medis Mar 30 2012 at 7:17
@Medis - learn to make your own sausage - sausages and salamis were the traditional way to store and use the leftover "nasty bits" after the steaks were long gone – cerement Apr 2 2012 at 7:37
3

I think there's a difference between how your body reacts to something and not "getting" a concept. Obviously, if your system can't handle coconut, you shouldn't eat it. That has nothing to do with your lack of understanding or some fault in the coconut advocates.

For me, the crazes I don't "get" are the obsession with elimination diets for FODMAPs and nightshades. For some people that have auto-immune or inflammation problems, sure...but the idea that you should take the time to eliminate entire families of vegetables and fruits just to see if they do cause you problems is hogwash. If you have a legitimate problem, get an allergy test. I think the Primal Palate people are doing some sort of elimination diet right now...why?

link|flag
4 
I think the problem is not understanding that how your body reacts to something is different from how others might react. It seems a lot of people don't "get" a craze if it has done nothing for them. For example, you don't get elimination of FODMAPS or nightshades. From what I've read, ellimination diets are a lot more reliable than allergy testing, especially since allergy testing only assesses IgE reactions, and not IgG and IgA reactions. For people who are having troubled finding the problem foods in their diet, an elimination diet can be a godsend. – Sara S. Mar 30 2012 at 13:55
4 
In all fairness, allergy testing is notoriously unreliable. I think an elimination diet seems totally reasonable for someone who's sick, as a method to identify the culprit. For me, it was nice to know that certain foods were not the culprits, so there was no need to treat them like poison. – Christopher Gagnon Mar 30 2012 at 14:42
4 
I think an elimination diet is reasonable for absolutely anyone because it is an opportunity to learn about yourself. Experimentation is a good thing. It doesn't cost anything, and it's not like you're going to die of nightshade veggie deficiency. – Alex Mar 30 2012 at 15:33
Okay, let me amend: I thinks the shear breadth of elimination diet advocacy is annoying. Everyone and their uncle has some food that gives them grief, and they harp on that one thing in every forum thread. It often isn't an intelligent recommendation either, just a broad dragnet that "might" answer someone's concerns. I don't know how you fix this other than finding actual concrete medical/scientific evidence to narrow it down... Seriously, between goitrogens, FODMAPS, nightshades, dairy, and olaxates, you might as well eliminate "all food" and see how that works out. – Cameron Mar 30 2012 at 22:39
2 
So be annoyed but some people are trying to fix themselves. Maybe you could find out why you get yourself wound up over something so trivial as other people's food intolerances? lol – Warren D Mar 30 2012 at 23:05
show 2 more comments
3

Hands down the coconut fat obsession. Coconut oil is highly processed. Coconut milk (cream) doesn't just drip from a coconut. I'm not sure it was on this board or not, but someone once issued a challenge of sorts. Get a real coconut in it's whole state. Not just the brown shell that has been pre-scored to crack easily with a little whack either. Now go get the coconut meat out of that coconut. There's no doubt our paleo ancestors in that climate would have eaten this food. There's also no doubt that they didn't consume up to several coconuts' worth of the fat daily.

Oh, and I know it's not an obsession, but I don't get ANYONE buying Primal Fuel!!

link|flag
I understand your take on coconut oil, but I just benefit so much from it... And it makes life way easier : I was underweight last year and don't want to under-eat ever again. – Korion Mar 31 2012 at 14:13
1 
Highly processed? The coconut oil I buy is fresh coconut that has been pressed and centrifuged. That's no more "highly processed" than other traditional fats, like butter, olive oil, sesame oil, rendered animal fat, etc. IMO, "highly processed" as a scare term should be limited to those "foods" which have actually been damaged into something unhealthy by the processing. – Alex Mar 31 2012 at 15:14
The analogy of fruit juice is too hard to ignore @Evelyn. One orange or apple is fine. The trouble starts when you process 10 oranges into juice and drink it. The same goes for fat, and your coconut oil logic makes lots of sense. – thhq Mar 31 2012 at 16:42
1 
@Alex: I've questioned whether any added fats are "paleo". Yes, olive oil, butter, lard, etc. are all "refined" foods. Depending on source, coconut oil can be highly processed -- deodorized, etc. So if all the CO folks are eating your brand, then it's not highly processed, but it remains a refined food. Just as sugar and flour are refined foods, so too is any oil extracted from a whole food. Doesn't make it bad, but it's not a natural food either. – Evelyn aka CarbSane Mar 31 2012 at 16:54
2 
Sure, it's not "paleo" that I put a pat of butter on my steak. But, then, it's also not "paleo" that the butcher trimmed off most of the fat from the meat. – Alex Mar 31 2012 at 18:10
2

I don't understand the orange juice and carrots.

link|flag
6 
that's not paleo per-se, that's a Ray Peat thing – Bread-Eating Beelzebub Mar 30 2012 at 20:50
(Does no one get my sarcasm?) – Dave S. Apr 2 2012 at 13:14
2

Never understood bone broth. Gelatin works better for me, and you don't even have to prepare it.
Never understood bacon, until I looked at the nutritional value and was a bit amazed to see it's pretty nutritious.
Never understood the fatty fish craze. I react better to non-fatty fish.
Never understood the retinol toxicity fear and vitamin D craze.
Never understood the magnesium hype.
I wish I could also say "Never understood the fructose fear", but I feared fructose for a long time myself.

Edit : Never understood the berries-craze. What's up with that? For what reason are berries better than any other fruit??? They happen to cause issues for me in big amounts ,most likely due to the tiny seeds.

link|flag
1 
I hate bone broth too! Its like liquid oil. UGH!! – Senneth Mar 30 2012 at 20:29
2 
Senneth, did you try taking the fat off the top off of the broth when it has gone cold? – Warren D Mar 30 2012 at 22:47
I don't hate bone broth, it just doesn't really do anything. I thought it'd improve my skin, but it doesn't even work as well as pure gelatin. The taste is okay though, but when I leave the fat in it's extremely nasty :). Senneth, just a quick question : did you try eggshell calcium once? And also : where do you get your potassium from? Now that I don't eat spinach anymore, I have trouble getting enough calcium and potassium. – Korion Mar 31 2012 at 12:02
1

I don't understand the high fat eating. I can't figure out how its healthy. Also, trying to eat paleo is pretty expensive

link|flag
6 
I can understand it, especially if you didn't eat fat for a long time. Maybe it has something to do with fat-soluble vitamins, the ones we're all deficient in? – Korion Mar 30 2012 at 8:01
1 
I think higher fat eating makes sense if someone is low-carb because they use the fats to make up for the calories they're not getting from starches/sugars. But I have to admit that my stomach twitches when I read about people cooking their bacon with lots of butter with eggs, sandwiched in-between sausage, and drinking coconut milk on the side. – Sunny Beaches Mar 30 2012 at 8:16
4 
I actually spend less now on food than I used to, pre-Paleo. For myself, that is. My husband is still a SAD eater. But my cheap cuts of meat, four dollar steaks and two dollars worth of broccoli are still less expensive than his deli sandwiches and premade frozen pizzas. – Canis Minor Mar 30 2012 at 13:20
3 
it's not that hard to figure out and if you spend any appreciable time around the paleosphere you'll find it makes a lot of sense – jake Mar 30 2012 at 14:22
4 
Heh. Can you figure out how it's NOT healthy? Just interested in the thought process. No offense meant. – Blossom1 Mar 30 2012 at 16:46
show 3 more comments
1

I react to coconut so EVCO is of the list....

link|flag
1 
Have you tried building up an immunity to it. People tend to try things, get sick and than write it off immediately. Coconut oil may not be natural in your old diet, try starting with a maximum of 1/4 of a teaspoon, maybe through cooking or plain and than work up. Also MCTs oil can be hidden in your water (made by Alpha).Its a perfect food, designed for brain health, especially for preventing/curing althemizers. – Chelsea Mar 30 2012 at 22:37
Thanks. I need to try those things. – Eric Mar 30 2012 at 23:31
1

Paleo shakes....I seriously don't get it.

If you just had jaw surgery, fine, mix or blend away.

But for the rest of us, as a meal replacement...how hard is it for you to chew your food? Bodybuilders, if you can lift those bad ass weights, why can't you be bothered to chew a steak?

Sure a blender can do what your teeth do, but food should ideally be slowly mixed with saliva to start the digestive process for good nutrient uptake unless you are mixing salivary amylase into your beverage.

Seems like it might also lead to mindless munching and overconsumption outside of shake time, since shakes deprive the consumer of a "true" meal sensory experience.

link|flag
1

ridiculously analytically scientific explanations

for everything

link|flag
0

How would ancestral peoples have had access to as much fat as modern paleo dieting demands? Free ranging animals are lean. Once taken and dressed, their fat has to be rendered for storage, and this requires cooking techniques beyond an open fire, as well as pottery. Fat storage is a Neolithic development. Beyond narrow paleo scenarios of abundant seals and buffaloes, getting a good yield of fat from animals requires domesticating them.

It seems likely to me that paleos rarely ate high fat meals. None of the highly rewarding fats from butter, coconut oil, fish oil or bacon. More likely the occasional rancid greasy joint.

link|flag
3 
Free ranging animals in northern climates store fat for the winter. For example, venison is lean, but deer have thick layers of fat right underneath the skin. Trimmed muscle meats and low-fat ideology are the cultural norm of today, but I seriously doubt paleo man would have feasted on the lean muscle and discarded the layers of fat. There's evidence that early hominids scavenged animal carcasses to break open bones to get at the fatty marrow, so if anything, it is paleo to seek out fat rather than shun it. – Alex Mar 31 2012 at 17:35
Seek it out yes for sure, and feast on it when available, but I doubt that this happened at every meal. From my current reading on Neolithic Turkey, fat was coming from domestic sheep and goats. Wear patterns on teeth suggest that much of the food was eaten raw even though there were ovens. Cattle were wild and were available from time to time but not a major part of the diet. – thhq Mar 31 2012 at 19:30
I thought we were well hooked up on the animal fat front until we hunted the really large beasties to extinction. Wonder if lack of mammoth drove people into the sea to hunt whales? – Happy Now Apr 2 2012 at 8:58
1 
Grubs are pretty fatty too, we just don't go for bugs as much these days. – Happy Now Apr 2 2012 at 8:59
I wish I could buy some grubs in Whole Foods – Roth Jun 22 2012 at 0:42

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.