I've seen a few question asked about the sustainability of the paleo diet and they all seem to argue the same thing(s). One article I read estimated that it would take half the land in the United States to grass feed our (Americans) intake of Beef. The point of methane and global warming arises too. My Question though, is if anyone has studied the sustainability of protected forestry versus pasture grazing of cattle. I love steak, don't get me wrong, but what about controlled harvesting and selling of deer, squirrel, rabbit, wild fruits and vegetables, ect in recovered/protected forests.. It just seems like people think beef is the only red meat in the world. So, does anyone know of any studies on this? or just want to tell me it's an awful idea? I just feel as though the biodiversity in a big field just isn't as awesome as in the woods.
|
3
|
||||||||||||
|
|
3
|
I think large tracts of fire-managed tallgrass prairie in the Midwest with free range herds of buffalo (culled by hunting) would be much more sustainable than forest preserves of deer/elk and would provide more more quality meat per acre of habitat. Tallgrass prairie is easily the most productive biome in the United States. It puts the pastures we raise cattle on to shame. And it would supply more ecosystem services to people, plus provide a lot more biodiversity than pasture/crop land. If I won the lottery I'd start buying up farmland here in central Missouri and restore it all back to tallgrass prairie (and hell yes, I'd put buffalo on it). Of course some of the mountainous regions in the Appalacians and Ozarks couldn't support prairie and would probably be prime elk/deer forest preserves. It definitely isn't rich farmland. I personally hate that we farm marginal land for crap crops instead of keeping it in forest or wetland or restoring it to one of these things - but that is a different story. |
||
|
|
|
2
|
Not everywhere has overpopulation but in many places it is a problem. However don't assume your kills are organic, the overpopulation comes from the deer eating crops which aren't being raised organically. Still way better than a feed lot animal. |
||||||
|
|
2
|
I don't have any studies to refer you to, but anecdotally I can tell you that in Australia we eat kangaroo. They don't farm it, just shoot it in the wild (as far as I am aware) so I imagine this is very sustainable. It took a while for people to accept it as an 'every day' kind of meat on the dinner tables of Australian families, but now it's sold in supermarkets and is very common and widely accepted. Maybe the US needs to consider doing the same for deer. |
|||||||||
|
|
2
|
"The point of methane and global warming arises too" Only among the easily duped. |
|||||||||||
|
|
1
|
There's massive deer overpopulation, so annual hunting season aid in keeping the population down. Nearly 200,000 deer are harvested from Illinois annually, for example. Overpopulation has occurred because so many predators have been wiped out, that's why we humans have to manage the deer herd now. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
