Blog

9

It seems that there's less and less Paleo people around. I see plenty of WAPF-type diet eaters here that recommend fermented forms of dairy and fermented/sprouted grains, but not many people who follow a strict Paleo diet. Wondering why this is. Is it because Paleo is too restrictive and a WAPF diet is essentially Paleo+healthy grains and dairy (which are generally the two food groups "normies" and unhealthies can't live without?)

flag
5 
healthy grains? lol there is no such thing! – Dags Jun 8 at 2:37
6 
Paleo is pretty broad, and to most people paleo is what we make it. Everyone defines their own paleo habits based on what fits their lifestyle. Personally, I'm more primal - I eat some fermented dairy but no grains and get most of my calories from fat, then protein, and the least from carbs. But Ill still call myself a paleo and will even cheat once in a while. I am paleo b/c i consider myself paleo and believe in most of the health benefits, but I've tailored it to what my body tolerates (and enjoys) b/c eating paleo should not be a prison! – EricAmz Jun 8 at 2:57
7 
Whoa, did you just suggest fermented grains are better than sweet potatoes? Blasphemy! – Mscott Jun 8 at 5:30
12 
WAPF. they knew the deal before anyone started saying "paleo." Just eat real food. Use common sense. Avoid processed foods, be active, smile, be a positive force in the world. Don't overthink stuff. Eat well to fuel your positive, active life. – ben61820 Jun 8 at 13:01
4 
To everyone, who thinks grains are inherently unhealthy. The longest living cultures today do eat grains. – Paul Jun 8 at 13:12
show 19 more comments

30 Answers

1

I'm still nearly 99% Paleo but for dark chocolate a few times a week. I do need to dial back the almonds again, but I've been working long hours without notice and that's what I have in my drawer as a "go to" snack when I'm truly hungry and IF isn't feeling like an option at that moment. I am grain free, dairy free, and eat very little in the way of carbs when I'm not exercising regularly to use them up. For the first time in 30 years (I'm 43), I feel like I have control over my body - allergies are almost non-existent now, acne is 98% gone most of the month (I am still a girl after all!), aches and pains are gone, blood sugars don't swing wildly any longer, haven't had a headache since I started eating Paleo. I just don't see a downside to it. Yes, my friends point out how inconvenient it is to have to cook all the time - but I love to cook and just take 5-6 hours on a weekend morning (or afternoon) and do it up all at once. Not a big sacrifice to feel good, I don't think. I think it's quite liberating that after 20 years of having to eat every 2 hours from wildly fluctuating blood sugars (not diabetic, but obviously insulin issues), I can go up to 18 hours without eating - super convenient when I travel through American airports with nothing but crap food offerings.

I think Paleo is too difficult for most people, which is what I tell my husband when he suggests that Paleo will take over the world. No, it won't - most people I know can't forego the conveniences of frozen foods and take out/restaurant fare. Hey, no matter to me, I love Paleo and can't NOT eat Paleo - I feel horrible. That being said, I'm happy for the ones that don't have any leaky gut issues or allergies (such as my husband who also eats 98% Paleo with full fat fermented Kefir). Good for them - it leaves more grass-fed meat and ghee for me. :)

link|flag
19

The crowd never seems to lighten up around here does it? Even Paleo Babby Jesus eats a corn tortilla every once in a while. (Or have we kicked him out of the club already?)

link|flag
Somebody call the paleo police! – Matt Jun 8 at 3:37
3 
+1 for Paleo Babby Jesus. Makes me laugh every time. – Todd B Jun 8 at 12:59
1 
Babby Jesus FTW! – Christopher Gagnon Jun 8 at 21:37
14

What the hell ever happened to the pareto principle? You know, doing 80% paleo and 20% other good stuff? Strict paleo can be a useful tool, but I personally have absolutely no interest in following a strict diet unless I absolutely have to.

alt text

You also are going to be WAY more effective IRL when interacting with other people if you refrain from calling foods "bad." I always just say "oh, I can't have any XYZ because it makes my stomach act up/allergies worse/etc." If they want to know more about your diet, they will ask you.

link|flag
1 
Whenever I see people refer to foods as bad or even use the term "neolethal," even though that one always gets a chuckle out of me, I think "boy they're sure drinking the paleo kool-aid." Always a good reminder for personal reflection, never know when a little confirmation bias will sneak up on ya. – lil' Richard frm tx fan Jun 9 at 11:13
<3 This is such an important point. – Olivia Jun 9 at 16:35
Upvoted for a good point. – Denis Jun 9 at 18:15
Most excellent memeing by the way. – FED at LiveCaveman.com Jun 9 at 21:00
12

Strict paleo is restrictive. I think it tends to attract people who trend towards the extreme/ascetic, people who strive for optimal, or people who are for whatever reason unable to eat any other way (IBS, gut issues or whatever). Once the latter group begins to experience a healing of the gut or the former realizes that a few compromises don’t make that much of a difference, then it only seems natural that people would tend to experiment with other non-paleo foods.

The premise that humans as a whole have not evolved since the paleolithic and should therefore only eat a diet in keeping with that stage of evolution is not widely accepted even in paleo communities, or at least if shouldn’t be. To be honest we can only speculate about some of the specifics regarding diet. The fact that any populations of humans should be adapted to be able to utilize milk beyond childhood should tell us that powerful selective forces are at work in shaping our individual evolution. I personally think it is important to take our recent ancestor’s way of life into consideration when determining what is optimal for each of us and balancing that with what is reasonable for the long-term.

It isn’t as though we all have the infrastructure or the means available to support 100% paleo compliant lifestyle. We all make some compromises and I think you’ll find that to be true once you’re a little further on your own journey. You may even find the dogmatic assertions of “newbies” to be a bit much.

Personally I find that if I follow my daily fast and workout with a PWO whey protein shake and later a decent dinner at home then I’m better able control the amount deleterious foods (for me) that I take in. Whereas if I had to pack a steak or other clean protein source with me throughout the day or try to find another source, my lifts and body recomp would suffer considerably. So I drink a shake and then eat a proper meal at home. If it means I’m not strict paleo in your eyes well so what. But for the record I really don’t see many paleos who eat grains, fermented or not on a regular basis—dairy is another case but one that is understandable in my eyes as long as your still able to move towards your optimal.

link|flag
4 
+1 for dogmatic assertions of newbies. We all start paleo quoting chapter and verse of the paleo gospels. :) – Matt Jun 8 at 11:23
I agree with you for the most part, but the argument about milk is not necessarily valid. That's more a matter of gene expression, as we were all (or most of us) born with the ability to digest. People who continue to digest lactose into adulthood are the ones in whom that gene continues to be expressed, it is not that a new gene was created. – EDubs Jun 8 at 23:48
1 
"I personally think it is important to take our recent ancestor’s way of life into consideration when determining what is optimal for each of us and balancing that with what is reasonable for the long-term." Exactly. I was "paleo" for about six months before I finally got around to reading Weston A Price's book. My views since reading that have been a lot more accommodating and rather Archevore-ish. Sugar, veg oils, gluten. Fermented legumes and some GF fermented grains actually have made me feel better. Not super frequent, but I definitely eat some. – blueballoon Jun 9 at 2:49
2 
It makes me wonder how much of a factor gut flora is. I think that for the average person not concerned with optimal just trying to avoid the biggies like diabetes and heart disease there may be smaller shifts that would be beneficial when viewed at the population level. Even 1950s era processed crap and food portions would probably halve health care costs. Most of us find paleo or WAPF because were already sick or we are health nerds looking to maximize our potential. – lil' Richard frm tx fan Jun 9 at 4:42
1 
Individual genetics (including the genetics of the microbiome) play a huge role, making "one size fits all" proclamations about diet (i.e. "gluten is the devil's excrement" - direct quote, bonus points if you can guess who) essentially meaningless. Humans, however, are predisposed towards essentiallism (aka stereotyping, generalizing, "black and white"-ing) and therefore it is to be expected that the tendency is to label some things "good" and others "bad. The paleo template provides a solid starting point for self-experimentation, but it's definitely not the be-all and end-all. – FED at LiveCaveman.com Jun 9 at 21:05
show 2 more comments
11

I'm definitely less hardcore paleo than I used to be. Just have come to the conclusion that paleo is too restrictive for folks with functional healthy guts. I simply minimize the verboten paleo foods and find I do just fine. I think most folks without deranged metabolisms, immune and digestive systems would also do fine with such an implementation.

link|flag
2 
"Deranged metabolism" boy that brings me back to the halcyon days of paleo. – lil' Richard frm tx fan Jun 8 at 3:44
2 
'Too restrictive' is certainly subjective, I totally enjoy the paleo diet and dont mind avoiding the less healthy foods. It just depends on how you value pleasure from food vs optimal long term health. Personally I am young/healthy and can get away with even eating things like cake without the negative short term effects, but I know that the damage adds up over time. It is best to avoid them all together and just not be emotionally attached to comfort food, but thats just my opinion – Carl D Jun 8 at 10:16
3 
It is certainly subjective, and it's my own subjective take on it. I don't think it's as simple as claiming I have a higher value on food pleasure than long-term health. I'm no longer convinced that long-term health is compromised by a little grain consumption. Without underlying gut health, metabolism and autoimmunity issues, grains/gluten/legumes are pretty harmless. – Matt Jun 8 at 11:21
4 
long-term health is ideal, but to be honest, once we've finished reproducing it's all down hill anyway...eat what makes you feel good and what your body responds to well (whatever level of compliance that may be) and you'll live a long and prosperous life that you also enjoy :) – mzrdnan Jun 8 at 11:33
Just eating meat would improve the lives of vegans out there. How many of THEM are left? A few hundred? Ewww I won't eat that! It touched meat! – thhq Jun 9 at 21:06
10

Interesting observation. I can't even picture myself touching dairy and the idea of "healthy grains" makes me giggle. 100%, strictly Paleo here. It isn't hard at all and I certainly don't dwell on what I don't eat.

link|flag
+1 especially this: "It isn't hard at all and I certainly don't dwell on what I don't eat." – Josh M Jun 8 at 5:12
2 
Me too, aseafish: Many would consider us 'extreme Paleo'... I don't even entertain the idea of dairy, legumes, grains or tubers in my diet. This is simply because they don't agree with me... Same goes for sugar/honey/sweeteners of any kind. I don't actually feel like I'm restricting anything because ive been dairy free for +2 years and gluten free for 9. Eliminating the other things has finally addressed my seemingly never-ending gastrointestinal distress. It's come to a point where I don't even consider these other things as foods anymore for myself. – Jen Jun 8 at 6:31
1 
so you guys never eat out and have cross-contamination or anything? or no gum ever? or coffee? do you supplement with any vitamins?? - all of which are strictly non-paleo – mzrdnan Jun 8 at 11:26
1 
Just to clarify, no I don't eat out, our kitchen is totally Paleo, so I don't anticipate cross-contamination. Strict Paleo does not mean no fun with food, geez. – aseafish Jun 9 at 2:53
1 
No supplements here. Gum is not appealing. I don't know that it's dedication so much as not seeing a reason to go another direction. If I'm cooking, I'm certainly not interested in preparing food that's harmful, and I do all our cooking. I should also mention, I am a serious foodie. We eat well and most definitely play with our food. – aseafish Jun 10 at 19:08
show 5 more comments
9

I think there may be some bias in the way we all talk about our diets. I totally get when folks need to be strict for health reasons, but the rest of us are all at varying degrees of compliance/adherence.

Chris Kresser nailed it when he called it a "Paleo template". Meaning there are some boundaries and depending on your individual needs, resources, and desires, your diet will not look like the diet of the Paleo next to you. It's kind of silly to compare one version of Paleo to another.

As someone who writes about this stuff, I certainly don't talk as much about my off-plan food choices. Maybe we should more often, to give a more accurate portrait of what Paleo looks like in real life. It would be fun to see a week's worth of food diary from all the big wigs, like Sisson, Wolf, Whole9, NomNomPaleo, etc. I wonder how many off-plan choices we'd see and how often?

In a philosophical way, it's sad that it's not easier to eat this way, that we have to expend so much energy just trying to stay within Paleo parameters. I wish it were easier, for all of our sakes.

link|flag
Kresser was talking about doing that! It would be awesome. – EDubs Jun 9 at 0:08
My guess is Kresser would be pretty unremarkable. He'd make us all look bad! ;) But just the act of recording a diet for the world to see and judge would make them choose more wisely, no? – Karen P. Jun 9 at 0:49
I mean he was talking about having people like sisson, wolf, etc. record their eating. – EDubs Jun 9 at 12:21
Ha! Even better! Make everyone else show their cards! ;) – Karen P. Jun 9 at 14:53
Sisson has done that in the past, I remember reading the post or posts. – PrairieProf Jun 9 at 18:35
show 3 more comments
9

I think there's a greater percentage of people on PaleoHacks who are looking to solve some serious problems they're having than in the Paleo community as a whole. They are more likely to find the typical low carb paleo diet isn't the cure all it presents itself as.

I had some serious digestive thyroid and hormonal issues that Paleo did not solve at all. When I figured out that a great deal of Paleo approved food was giving me problems, I started questioning the wisdom against all grains, dairy and legumes. I don't want to not eat something that I have no problems with and that I enjoy a great deal just because its not "Paleo." And I'm not going to stuff myself with "Paleo" foods like coconut, kale and cauliflower when they make me want to curl up and die from the pain they cause. I don't see the logic in that.

Still, I only have 1-2 servings of grains a day - rice or masa. And I do make some gluten free oat bars once in a while that are lightly sweetened with maple syrup. 80% of my diet is still Paleo and I do think Paleo is the right approach: eating animals is the most important thing, and the closer you are to the earth with your food, the better. We really do need to shift the focus in nutrition away from grains in the US. I also greatly appreciate the skepticism over popular medical advice - stay out of the sun! eat less meat! pills cure everything!, etc.

link|flag
6 
+++ whenever I see recipes for "paleo" cauliflower "rice", I can't even imagine what that would do to my stomach. Real rice is so much gentler. – Bread-Eating Beelzebub Jun 9 at 4:07
I agree. Cauliflower feels like steel wool on the insides. – EDubs Jun 9 at 19:40
Lol, but cauliflower "rice" is PK! (Paleo Korrect, Paleo Kosher, Paleo Kool...) – FED at LiveCaveman.com Jun 9 at 21:08
6

I've never been quite paleo to begin with. I find the research fascinating and the discussions more intellectual than anything I ever found on other boards.

link|flag
1 
Eating meat and staying active is paleo enough for me. True Paleos put too much faith in Gary Taubes and too little faith in hunt-and-gather behavior. – thhq Jun 9 at 20:47
6

I strive for full paleo ( no dairy, grains, potatoes, sugar, vegetable oils, legumes) whenever possible. I have been striving for full-paleo, since 2010. As a recovering alcoholic, and as someone who struggles with extreme anxiety, fatigue, and malnutrition from gluten-intolerance, I find that when I am fully "paleo-in the strict-whole30-sense", I feel tons better- almost like a new person.

I do like to eat sweet potatoes, at least once a week, to get a bit of starchy sweetness, but when I get lax and start thinking a few nights of corn chips and cheese aren't going to hurt me (every week), I can see the cumulative ill-effects on my waist-line, and general well-being.

I love cooking healthy food: meat, veggies, and the very occasional fruit dessert. Eating out is still fun, but it's expensive, and I am disappointed when I pay to eat out and can make the dish 100X better at home. We tend to have a lot of dinner parties at my place, instead.

I have been trying to think of food more as fuel and nutrition, rather than entertainment. By doing a few weeks of eating strictly unseasoned meat and heavy green veg stew, I realized that I often eat more for flavor than actual hunger.

I don't hate food, I love it! But, I think my mental priorities have changed: my every day food is about nourishing my weak body, so that I can grow stronger and accomplish more. Party food for me is for special occasions, where anything gluten-free goes, but I still can't really enjoy it as much. The co-workers pity me, because I can't eat cake. They blink, uncomprehendingly, when I say it REALLY doesn't bother me- I just don't want it.

A LONG, SUNNY, WALK IN THE WOODS= 20 SLICES OF CAKE TO ME.

link|flag
1 
P.S. I'm not trying to come across as a "hardcore Paleo fascist". I really mean it- there is a reason why the "paleo" way of eating in the past few decades have not recommended grains, dairy, sugar, and vegetable oils. I don't care, at all, what anyone else eats, because I'll probably die of cancer (due to over a decade of smoking and drinking), but I do want to make the best of my time here, with my husband, especially since I have lost four people I care deeply about in the past few years, due to disease and depression. I will probably lose 3 more, next year. – Lyndsay Jun 8 at 5:27
1 
"Eating out is still fun, but it's expensive, and I am disappointed when I pay to eat out and can make the dish 100X better at home." YES! I have come to realise this – mzrdnan Jun 8 at 11:27
1 
"A LONG, SUNNY, WALK IN THE WOODS = 20 SLICES OF CAKE TO ME." RIGHT ON! I wouldn't say it's 20 slices for me, but it's good for at least 2 or 3! ;) – Amy B. Jun 8 at 20:28
Yes, I agree with that last line. Depends what kind of cake though ;) – Korion Jun 8 at 20:46
6

I'm not paleo anymore, because I don't believe it is optimal and it is not sustainable for me as a student. Too much work cooking stuff, and if I fast I get issues.

link|flag
3 
So what do you do now instead? – DJDeeJay Jun 8 at 21:32
3 
Can I have your gold badge then? – Karen P. Jun 8 at 21:34
2 
I've enjoyed your young voice on this blog and hope you stay tuned and do whatever works for youl – Doris Jun 8 at 21:56
@DJDeeJay Just added dairy, sugar, honey, haagen-dazs, coffee, chocolate, and I'm not eating veggies but fruit instead. It's still pretty close but with sugar and ice cream I can't call myself paleo :) @Karen haha NO! @Doris Thanks Doris! – Korion Jun 9 at 6:59
5

I've shifted towards primal. I do have a few corn tortillas maybe once a month, but otherwise, it's paleo + dairy.

With the exception of corn, I'm grain-free.

Or the occasional haggis (oats), that I eat maybe twice a year.

link|flag
5

Having started with Michael-Pollan style 'real foods', gone through WAPF and into primal/paleo I still swing between completely no-grain and a tiny bit of sourdough bread, mostly as a vehicle for delicious grass-fed butter. Sometimes I think I should be stricter but I've tested negative for celiac, have no autoimmune issues, and though my gut is wobbly on occasion, going gluten free didn't seem to make any difference. But I'd never go back to lots of starch/grains, even prepared WAPF-style - my rosacea has cleared up, my weight dropped a little (I wasn't overweight to begin with) and stabilised with no hunger issues. All in all I'm happy being mostly paleo, with an odd bit of sourdough and other 'stretches' including daily dark chocolate and a glass of wine with dinner and a small amount of dairy. For me it's a more workable, long-term strategy than trying to be stricter and stricter all the time, not great for me as I have a history of eating disorders. This way I feel I am eating well but enjoying food still without becoming too obsessive.

link|flag
5

I don't think its too restrictive, its just a starting point. No one (in my opinion) believes paleo is the end all be all diet for every human on the planet. I certainly do not. People are different and different things work for them. Some people thrive on dairy others do not. Some people thrive on low carb others feel like they are dying on it. Some people can't eat fruit without binging others have no issues with it.

Everyone is different and that is why self experimentation (n=1) is part of Paleo. Paleo is a starting point for those who need it but it is not a set of unbreakable laws nor is it perfect.

link|flag
4

I'm totally grain, legume, and dairy free with rare treats of gluten-free cookies made with tapioca and rice flours, dark chocolate, tamari, and alcohol (in small doses). I don't drink coffee, but a few times a week I'll have tea or kombucha.

I am not low-carb: I have about 100-150 g carbs per day, in the form of root veggies and fruit, depending on the season. In fact, I try to eat as seasonally as possible, except I regularly eat bananas for convenience.

I'm only this strict because that's what my body needs. I hope some day to add back fermented or fresh dairy, but that's not in the cards for now. I tried adding back rice and corn at one point, and I can tolerate a bit of rice and certified gluten-free and nixtamalized corn (shared mills lead to too much cross-contamination for me), but I don't feel good when I eat them, so I only eat them very rarely.

I like that many of the people in this community use the strict guidelines as a starting point, and then experiment and expand as fits their individual needs. It keeps things sane.

link|flag
2 
I like to hear that there are other people out there who enjoy eating fruit. Reading some of the posts around here, you'd think fruit was the devil! – Snickoo Jun 9 at 13:54
2

I guess I would put myself on the stricter end of the Paleo spectrum.

A majority of my calories come from meat or seafood. Then fats (coconut oil, butter, olive oil). Then veggies (including starchy veggies). Then nuts a few times a week. Sometimes I'll eat dairy because I know I tolerate it. Very rarely do I eat fruits; although, it being almost summertime, I'm tempted to buy some mangoes.

I hardly cheat. I only go out to eat at restaurants two or three times a month and even then I will stick to the most Paleo-friendly entrees available. I do frequent bars and will enjoy a glass of vodka tonic or a shot of tequila or two (or three).

I am considering adding back white rice into my diet partly because I'm Asian and rice is always there. Taunting me.

link|flag
2

I'm VLC at less than 25 grams a day. I do have heavy cream in my coffee, but no other dairy. I don't eat legumes or wheat. I see myself staying as VLC as I am until I lose some weight. Then I intend to add some yams. Make of it what you will. I think of myself as 80/20 since I tend to follow the primal branch of the family.

link|flag
How long have you been vlc, and have you lost weight yet? Also coffee for some people can hinder weight loss by increasing insulin levels, just something to watch out for. – Carl D Jun 8 at 9:50
2

I flip flop. It is mostly due to social factors. I enjoy the diet but not the isolation that comes with sticking with it strictly.

link|flag
I don't see how you could be isolated really. When everyone is eating pasta, you eat pork chops (or whatever), simple! – Carl D Jun 8 at 10:19
3 
@Carl D-I wish it were always that simple but I sometimes (often) go to other people's houses. We are watching PPV fights or the Superbowl or whatever; "oh, no thanks I won't have any spaghetti or pasta" or "no thanks those loaded potato skins have dairy on them" or "sorry that fried chicken has wheat breading and I just got tested for celiac due to my extreme reaction to wheat" or "you guys are ordering pizza? Get me that new Dominoes gluten-free crust at half the size and twice the price as the pizzas your getting for everyone else." – lil' Richard frm tx fan Jun 8 at 12:00
2 
I used to feel isolated because I am strict Paleo (health issues) and I realized it was my friends who were uncomfortable watching me either (a) not eat; or (b) eat something really fatty while they pick at their salads with ranch dressing on the side with a diet coke. I decided to let them feel uncomfortable and to just sit there with a club soda with lime rather than eat sub-par meat and spend money at a restaurant when I could spend it on some pastured eggs and feel 100% better then next day. Life is ALL about choices - social or otherwise. – Cheryl Jun 9 at 2:28
I'm lucky I have friends who don't give a fuck :) – Korion Jun 9 at 17:47
2

Im paleo plus I.F 6days a week. Monday I eat whatever I want.

link|flag
2

No grains, no legumes, no casein. In the summer time I get tempted to do smoothies with whey protein because I don't want to heat up the house, and butter is great, but casein seems to be the big bad thing in milk. I have no interest in wheat. I still like rice, but I've only had it occasionally. People laugh when I tell them rice is like a drug to me. I think I'm still pretty strict. I'm happy to go to a social event and just not eat. Probably drives some people nuts, but I don't see much up side on conformity.

link|flag
1 
+1 for not eating at social events. I agree with you 100% on the conformity issue. Others are very uncomfortable with this - I'm fine with it. It's their problem. – Cheryl Jun 9 at 2:30
2

It seems that there's less and less Paleo people around.

I challenge the premise of the question. I don't think enough data is available to support this assertion, since the only relevant data (here on PH, anyway) I can think of are the posts to PH, which represent only a self-selected group of people and not necessarily a representative sample of eaters in the community.

I could just as easily claim there are seems to be more and more paleo people around, since more people know about it.

link|flag
Not just PH. A multitude of other health communities would indicate that people are switching from Paleo and Primal to "quite heavily modified Paleo." – BoneBrothFast Jun 9 at 13:13
2

Paleo nazis would not be happy with me. Even though I eat lots of protein and I'm not afraid of fat, I eat high carb, including legumes and some sprouted grains. And I don't stress about sugar too much.

I'm a foodie first. And I'm european. Food is part of my culture and very important to me. Going to a restaurant is a social event where my friends and I enjoy good food and wine and talk and laugh until it's almost midnight.

So, yes, I'm not strictly so-called "paleo". I was for a while and it was very useful for figuring out to what kind of foods I react. But I really appreciate stress-free evenings and artisan foods. I couldn't live without those aspects in my life. There is no fast food, no crap food, no processed foods though. Foods like sweetbread, foie gras and veal tongue: oh yes please. But they might come with a piece of sourdough bread. You better cover your eyes!

link|flag
I'm here for what paleo affirms not what it denies. You can never be perfect enough. But I'm always disappointed to see such strictness regarding food and such laxness regarding activity. It's all about nomadic life folks! – thhq Jun 9 at 20:59
1

Are there really all that many people on here recommending WAPF-grains? It seems to me more that the few odd questions stand out, and that a lot of WAPF eaters end up paleo and/or have a sense of camaraderie with the paleo folks.

link|flag
2 
I think it's the other way around - a lot of Paleo eaters end up WAPF. But yeah, I agree that the two groups aren't at odds. Not at odds like Paleo and 30bad followers are anyway. – BoneBrothFast Jun 8 at 2:44
3 
I dont see a lot of WAPF grains, I see more of the fermented foods and raw dairy. (Both of which I eat because they are delicious!) – AmandaLP Jun 8 at 3:21
I think I've seen more WAPFers go Paleo than the other way around. Unless you consider a person who on has ever eaten a little fermented dairy to be WAPF. – lil' Richard frm tx fan Jun 8 at 11:51
1

I consider my diet mostly paleo. I do eat aged cheddar though, and use coconut oil and butter for cooking, and small amounts of glucose for sweetner. I certainly dont eat any grains, only seeds I have are occasional nuts, and my starch/carb intake is probably lower than an actual hunter gatherer (for my own health reasons).

So not entirely paleo, but I doubt many people were ever strictly 100% paleo. Even if they were, in the pop sense, its unlikely there nutritional intake was all that comparable to paleo eaters. And I am not trying to eat for some "asthetic" of being natural, I am trying to eat optimal foods for my body, which happen to be largely grounded in evolution..

To see what I mean - check this article out:

http://www.answers.com/topic/stone-age-nutrition-the-original-human-diet

What I try and emulate most about paleo eating is minimal anti-nutrient foods such as no grains, low sugar fruits and other aspects of wild nutrition, rather than merely imitating the food groups in the broad simple sense.

A good example is farmed beef. Farmed beef, grass-fed or not, is high in saturated fat, low in other fats compared to wild animals. Wild land animals have about 1/3 sat fat, 1/3 mono, 1/3 poly. Its a nice even spread...

Imitating that profile, and the profile of fruit when I eat it (low sugar, higher anti-oxidants and vitamins), and if I ever eat starchy carbs, not that I have been, that too (lower starch root veges versus potatoes etc) - so that my diet is roughly nutrionally like paleo eating.

Particularly when it comes to fats. Fats are supposed to make up a majority of our caloric intake, but if that fat has little resemblance to out anscestors fats then we are missing the boat. Merely adding rendered animal fats, butter, coconut oil etc, isnt going to end up with a similar profile unless we are using wild game animal fats...

Merely eating modern whole foods, as if it was wild whole foods doesnt really end up with anything like the same nutritional profile, not just in terms of how farm animals are fed and omega balances, but also vitamin intake, sugar levels, and sat/mono/poly proportions. Not to mention modern stuff like seperated fats and oils...

Id eat 100% game and wild caught fish, wild picked berries, nuts, sprouts, greens and roots, roasted over a fire, but thats not really viable or practical for me! (plus I dont live next to a wild forest)... so I try and balance my fat proportions instead and other aspects instead. Its a balancing act for sure, given the differences.

From what ive been reading on research on what we ate during that era, wild foods versus modern foods, emulating the exact balance of macro and micro nutrients is alot trickier than merely eating more meat and less carbs and avoiding table sugar and processed foods....Mostly because 95% of modern veg, fruit and farmed meat are all nutrionally different from their wild counterparts. Short of still eating 100% wild caught foods, its difficult emulating those balances

(see article linked above for the sort of details I am refering to)

my 2c...

TLDR - is merely eating roughly similar foods, but modernised whole foods rather than wild caught or found food really paleo anyway? It should not be about an asthetic IMO, being paleo, or being some kind of romantic food idealist, but rather getting a similar macro and micro nutrient intake and not eating foods which we have less time to adapt too (like grains)..

link|flag
I agree that sometimes I enjoy the aesthetic of thinking myself as more primal or whatever, but of course that's not the case. From what I understand the general philosophy of this diet is to be as close as we can to the diet our ancestors ate. That would be extremely difficult or expensive and is not a viable way for most people to eat, so we do our best by adding things like butter, lard, coconut oil, supplements etc. It's by no means ideal, but pretty much the best most of us are going to get. Plus, organic grass fed meat is not that expensive if you have your priorities in order. – Carl D Jun 8 at 10:25
1

I'm still 100% paleo, yes occasionally I cheat, but not much, and its usually, dark chocolate, raw honey, and fruit...

link|flag
1 
so.... not 100% then? – peter Jun 9 at 2:46
1 
100% 99% of the time – Sal Jun 10 at 3:44
1

I eat Paleo about 90% of the time. I do have a little heavy cream in my coffee and a daily packet of Sweet N Low seems to be something I can't quite give up. I do not eat grains, cheese, potatoes, rice, etc.

link|flag
0

I was WAPF before I was paleo, and there's no way I'll ever go back to eating that much starch, because starch is the one thing I need to avoid. So, I eat fruit, veggies, meat, and dairy (cream, butter, yogurt, and limited amounts of cheese.)

link|flag
0

I find it very easy to include the right things and eat good meals at home and work. I kind of suck at omitting the wrong things, mainly because my willpower to say no is remarkably low. To be at a cocktail reception and ignore the little finger foods they bring by, not a skill I have learned as of this point in life.

link|flag
0

Staying pretty strictly Whole30 style Paleo is the only way I can avoid severe migraines and insomnia. I experimented with many different diets before figuring this out including WAPF. Maybe once a month I'll have some corn tortillas or rice noodle. The corn tortillas don't bother me if it stays at once a month, more than that and ouch! The rice noodles bother me after only one meal but sometimes I just gotta have proper Pho. Made the mistake of having coconut milk ice-cream a while back. The closest I've been to a migraine since I switched my diet almost a year ago. Terrifying.

link|flag
0

I'm GAPSing right now, since regular paleo (which, admittedly, I was somewhat lax about) hadn't helped my acne (though the other benefits were great!) I haven't added beans, so I'm actually still pretty close to a sort of starch-free paleo framework, with "cheats" (treats? for my own sanity, I try not to think of them as cheats) that include, you know, the nut-flour-based honey-sweetened baked goods I have a weakness for and, thankfully, are expensive and time consuming so I don't have them too often.

Previously, I was mostly paleo but would have gluten-free replacements occasionally, because cake/cookies are still delicious to me and never let me down, damn it. The GF snacks are obviously out now, though. Post-GAPS I'll probably continue focusing on paleo/primal type foods, or maybe something WAPF-ish (if I can do a couple vegetarian meals every week and save money that way, great. Meat is my favorite forever, but it's expensive) for the majority of what I eat, but since I want to travel I'm kind of hoping that, while I'll still avoid it when possible, occasional gluten will no longer send me spiraling through a mind fog and into a depression. Beforehand I was convinced gluten was probably horrible for everyone, but GAPS kind of gave me the mindset that a healing diet should improve tolerance of foods, not keep it the same and definitely not create more avoidance. A little flexibility within a whole-foods framework doesn't hurt in the social department.

link|flag

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.