Blog

1

Hi Folks,

My lipid panel just came in. The results do not look peachy. Here are the stats:

Total cholesterol 309

Triglyceride 21

HDL cholesterol 104

LDL (Calculated) 201

Cholesterol to HDL Ratio 3.0

Look at that LDL. It's sky-high, and my doctor is concerned. Should I be worried? Here's a sample of my daily menu:

Breakfast:

4 eggs 1 tbsp of added fat (either butter, EVOO, or coconut oil) 1 roasted beet

Lunch:

6oz of a cooked protein (either chicken with skin or beef) 2 cups of melange of roasted cauliflower, carrots, and swiss chard. 1 tbsp of added fat (either butter, EVOO, or coconut oil)

Snacks during the day:

1 piece of fruit (e.g. one grapefruit, one apple, or one nectarine) 2 boiled eggs

Dinner:

Pretty much a variation on what I had for lunch.

Thank you very much for any and all input!!!

flag
what were your labs before you started eating so well? I mean are these numbers worse or better or..? I personally would want to have my CRP (high sensitivity) tested. – Crowlover Jun 11 2012 at 23:39
My last blood test one year ago (when I was already on Paleo) was exactly the same except my LDL was 120, not 200. Only two things have changed: more meat, more added saturated fat (i.e. butter and coconut), and more eggs (sometimes up to 8 per day instead of 3). What's CRP? Any other suggestions? THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THE INPUT! – Arthur Jun 12 2012 at 0:12
Pre-paleo HDL was 39 and LDL was 56. – Arthur Jun 12 2012 at 0:23
wow sorry about this Arthur. You eat so well too. My understanding is that its a measurement of inflammation related to atherosclerosis but also a good marker for general inflammation in the body. This is a good explanation. heartdisease.about.com/od/cardiacriskfactors/a/… – Crowlover Jun 12 2012 at 0:41
1 
CRP = C-reactive peptide, and yes it is an inflammatory marker. LDL as "bad cholesterol" is too simplistic. Your extremely high HDL makes up for it. Cholesterol: HDL means very little ... LDL:HDL is a better measure, and yours is a healthy 2.0 – interrobung Jun 12 2012 at 1:14
show 2 more comments

6 Answers

3

Your body seems like it is very good at using the fat as energy. Hence the low triglyceride numbers. My numbers are in the 40's. I'm not a doctor but I can tell you that your LDL calculation is WAY off. The traditional formula(Friedewald) labs use to calculate LDL does not work when you have "low/normal" triglyceride levels. I had the same problem. You can use this website
to calculate your LDL using the Iranian formula. It works much better for lower triglyceride levels. I took the liberty of entering your numbers and your LDL dropped to 138.

link|flag
I had never heard of the Iranian formula. Thank you for pointing it out. 138 is a much better number. – Arthur Jun 12 2012 at 15:23
3

Read this - http://chriskresser.com/5-reasons-not-to-worry-about-your-cholesterol-numbers

link|flag
1 
Good info. thanks Jamie. – Crowlover Jun 12 2012 at 4:40
Totally great info. Found it just before reading this thread - to quote it "If you want to worry about your cholesterol numbers, forget about total cholesterol and LDL and pay attention to the ratio of triglycerides to HDL." - this is what predicts whether your LDL is fluffy (healthy), or small and dense (the only worrysome thing, the thing that causes heart attacks) – Jamie Jun 12 2012 at 9:07
1 
Going on the numbers posted in the question: trigylerides =21 /HDL = 104, totals to 0.2, well under the number 2 required to suggest your LDL is light and fluffy, suggesting very healthy results..keep eating those good fats! – Jamie Jun 12 2012 at 9:10
2

Have a read here: http://www.wheatbellyblog.com/2012/06/i-lost-weight-and-my-cholesterol-went-up/ According to this blog post by this doctor, when losing weight, fat's toxins are released in the bloodstream, so these blood numbers are to expected. Definitely keep a close tab on all your numbers though, it might be of concern.

link|flag
Eugenia I just want to tell you that I have really appreciated all the information you give on this site. I also looked at your blog ;) GREAT stuff. Thanks so much. – Crowlover Jun 12 2012 at 1:01
1 
Thank you, I appreciate this! :) – Eugenia Jun 12 2012 at 1:14
1 
Omg, great link! My sister's results were really bad after switching to paleo for a month and I had no idea why. Thanks! – hb Jun 12 2012 at 1:35
2

My recent lipid panel was almost identical to yours! All my ratios were ideal, and I have no other risk factors, so I'm not too worried about cardiac risk. However, Chris Kresser and Chris Masterjohn both believe that very high TC and LDL and very low HDL and triglycerides could indicate a metabolic, immune, or inflammatory issue. What that might mean for me, I have no idea.

I posted a question about my levels a few days ago and got some excellent answers. Here's the thread:

Yikes! Total cholesterol over 300?

link|flag
Wow! Thank you for the link to your wonderful post. It makes me feel a little easier about the results. I do have IBS-C, though. And I'm completely dependent on miralax for daily regularity. Sadly, this is something that Paleo hasn't fixed. Could this be contributing the high LDL? Thanks! – Arthur Jun 12 2012 at 15:22
0

Wow...those numbers are a little scary! Is this an increase since you started? Are you exercising? My inexperienced opinion would be to reduce your eggs to 2 or less per day, increase your dark, leafy greens (spinach, asparagus, broccoli, etc), take the skin off the chicken and limit beef to 1x per week. I also have had very positive experiences with increasing exercise and reducing cholesterol. I saw a 30 point drop with just an hour of daily, intense exercise.

link|flag
Exercise is my weak spot. Virtually nothing during the week because I work 9-11 hour shifts in a relatively active job (dental assistant). I may do a few hikes during the weekend, though. I have a history of somewhat compulsive exercising thus I really don't like to do it. :( I'm okay eating more greens. Though I do have IBS and must be very careful with fiber. What should I eat instead of chicken and beef? Fish is way too expensive and it's not filling. – Arthur Jun 12 2012 at 0:14
-4

Go on a plant based diet. All that animal product contains saturated fat and cholesterol. Plants don't have cholesterol and the fiber will help remove the cholesterol. Please check this book out. http://www.amazon.com/The-Engine-Diet-Firefighters-Save-Your-Life/dp/0446506699
http://www.amazon.com/Prevent-Reverse-Heart-Disease-Nutrition-Based/dp/1583333002

You can always eat canned fish stuff with high Omega 3 like sardines and canned salmon. Pretty cheap. Ideal way would be for you to just eat plants legumes and whole grains. Those numbers are scary and very high. Goodluck and God bless you.

link|flag
1 
Better yet, try the sunlight diet. It will work at least as well as this recommendation. – Mike T Jun 12 2012 at 1:15
2 
"Go on a plant-based diet" is the sort of misguided standard medical advice most of us are here to avoid. There is nothing essentially wrong with saturated fat or cholesterol if your diet does not promote a global inflammatory response. – interrobung Jun 12 2012 at 1:19

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.