I have no information on the long-term health of Kenyan marathong runners.
However it reminded me of an interesting theory for why so many good marathon runners come from Kenya, aparently particularly from the Kalenjin tribe. From here http://www.aafla.org/SportsLibrary/SportsHistorian/1997/sh172d.pdf
Still, while there is something in
each of these - altitude, diet,
poverty - that helps explain the
phenomenon of Kenyan running as a
whole, none of them begins to account
for the hugely disproportionate
success of the Kalenjin. For that, we
have to look more closely at
circumstances unique to the tribe.
An obvious thought is that the Kalenjin
might be endowed with some sort of
collective genetic gift. This is
touchy stuff, of course, and there is
nothing like replicable scientific
data to support the idea. But the
primafacie case for a genetic
explanation makes some sense: the
Kalenjin marry mainly among
themselves; they have lived for
centuries at altitudes of 2,000 meters
or more; and, at least by tradition,
they spend their days chasing up and
down hills after livestock. So it is
not unreasonable to suggest that over
time some sort of genetic adaptation
has taken place that has turned out to
be helpful in competitive distance
running.
This notion gets some flimsy support from the fact that linguistic
data link the Kalenjin to tribes
elsewhere in East Africa that have
turned out a majority of their
countries’ world class runners: these
groups, all of them historically
pastoral as opposed to agricultural,
include the Oromo in Ethiopia, the
Iraqw and Barabaig in Tanzania and the
Tutsi in Burundi. There is a
temptation to imagine a race of lean,
cattle-herding uebermenschen wandering
up and down the Rift Valley.
What I find more intriguing, however,
is the possibility that some of these
peoples’ customs might have functioned
indirectly as genetic selection
mechanisms favoring strong runners. I
am thinking specifically of the
practice of cattle theft -
euphemistically known as cattle
raiding. It was common to all these
pastoral peoples, but in Kenya, at
least, the Kalenjin were it is
foremost practitioners. Of course they
did not regard it as theft; they were
merely repossessing cattle that were
theirs by divine right and happened to
have fallen into other hands. Never
mind that those into whose hands the
cattle had fallen often felt the same
way. Anyway, Kalenjin raids often
called for treks of more than 100
miles to capture livestock and drive
them home before their former owners
could catch up. The better a young man
was at raiding – in large part, a
function of his speed and endurance
- the more cattle he accumulated. And since cattle were what a prospective
husband needed to pay for a bride, the
more a young man had, the more wives
he could buy, and the more children he
was likely to father. It is not hard
to imagine that such a reproductive
advantage might cause a significant
shift in a group’s genetic makeup over
the course of a few centuries.
No evidence but it's an fun bit of speculation.