I think a lot of you know what I'm talking about. Provocative questions get branded as 'trolling' or 'argumentative/subjective' - and then get wiped from the site in true North Korean/Iranian/Orwellian fashion. I don't want to single out any moderator in particular, but it seems quite inscrutable that a site devoted to Paleolithic dieting should have such a marked absence of balls.
So sound off - while you still can.
For anyone who is interested this PaleoHipster has made many different accounts here with different user names.
They post never ending stupid and usually insulting questions, answers and comments about Jack Kruse and Jimmy Moore.
They also regularly make unpleasant remarks about one of the moderators here.
They also regularly choose user names here that imply they are someone else.
All of these actions will end up with you getting banned in the end.
All of PaleoHipster'a accounts were deleted yesterday after a couple of really rather unpleasant personal comments and yet here they are back again today with yet another new account. PaleoHipster is one of those trolls who just cannot stay way.
Make all voting transparent. (upvotes, downvotes)
Community rule. Meaning if a post isn't fit for consumption it has to be VOTED down to THEN be considered for removal by multiple moderators. (supreme court style).
Without this, paleohacks is a lot less than it could be.
I have not noticed this. I don't even know who the moderators are. I have modded before, and you see the posts differently when you have to do that.
I do want to point out that, as Betty White noted, vaginas are tougher than balls. It makes for a more realistic expression. "Grow a VAG!"
No voting - period. No upvotes, downvotes, points, badges, awards other testosterone-driven things.
Leave "flag" and edit, but make very specific rules about flagging (spam, insulting, etc.)
Do you agree with paleo-censorship? 0 Answers