Has anyone here been thinking they are dehydrated? Or that the initial weight loss was just water weight?
This seems to be a claim made pretty often. I just read that the reason for losing weight on low carb is because carbs help store water and help to keep you hydrated and essentially going low carb is just a way of dehydrating yourself.
Well, this is interesting! I have one of those scales that reads fat, hydration & muscle %. I know they are not completely accurate, but im going by what it has been telling me over the last 3 years, so my averages. Before on a SAD i was a steady 49-51% hydrated, which the booklet says is normal. Since primal/paleo (with days of ketosis and obviously low carbs) i have lost 5 lbs in 6 weeks. Here's the cool part: my muscle % went up, my fat % went down and my hydration has stayed at 53 % (so higher than on SAD). I feel like this debunks the myth that low carbing initial weight loss is all water weight! But What do you guys make of this?
The initial weight loss is excess water weight. The wouldn't trust anything on the scale except the weight. I have one as well that continually tells me I'm 30% bodyfat. Also remember that muscle glycogen is 1 part glucose plus 4 parts water. This is why I'm a fan of consuming any carbohydrates in the evening post workout.
I can only speak for my own bodily experiences, but when I have a day of SAD foods or have lots of booze, I absolutely retain water. I'm LC daily, no more than 50g, and I'm peeing like a champ ALL THE TIME, but for a few days after adding a lot of carbs it's not nearly as often. Out of nowhere within two days or so, it comes rushing back. It's pretty clear to me that I've burned off carbs, alcohol, sugars, whatever junk and that I'm starting to lose the water weight and burn the fat.