Blog

1

We have all heard that breakfast is the "most important meal of the day." Is there truth to this, or is it a "health myth"?

flag
i wonder what the correlation is between breakfast skippers and coffee drinkers? – MikeD Dec 6 2010 at 23:20

15 Answers

11

Meaningless MYTH.

link|flag
6

Well it's based on the theory your metabolism shuts down if you don't eat for long enough. Obviously not true. Also, many people on the sad will have hypoglycemia by then and feel cranky, run down, etc. If you are eating paleo, this shouldn't be an issue. I skip breakfast quite often, with no ill effects.

link|flag
6

Breakfast is the first meal of the day with which you "break your fast" after the night.

So technically even if you eat your first meal of the day at 2pm it is still your breakfast. Making that meal a decent one is not a bad thing.

I expect that back in the days when most people worked in hard labour intensive jobs an large early breakfast was much more important. I can't imagine starting a long working day down a coal mine with a pickaxe or harvesting crops in the fields with a sythe on an empty stomach.

There are however many similar food related sayings in the English language. They are repeated through the generations, either they sound good or they just memorable, not because they are correct :)

"An apple a day keeps the doctor away."

"Eat your crusts, it'll make your hair curly."

"Eat your carrots and you'll be able to see in the dark."

"Eat breakfast like a king, lunch like a prince, and dinner like a pauper."

"Man does not live on bread alone."

link|flag
6

Just read myth number 7 on Martin's list. This guy knows all there is to know about IFing which is what happens after your last meal of the day. The break-fast will happen at the end of your fast. http://www.leangains.com/2010/10/top-ten-fasting-myths-debunked.html

link|flag
4

With all the bacon possibilities it is certainly the "most delicious meal of the day." Ranks high on the important meal scale for this reason for me.

link|flag
4 
But you can eat bacon any time you want! – Ambimorph Dec 6 2010 at 22:51
true, i eat breakfast several times a day. – MikeD Dec 6 2010 at 23:18
kinda sad this hasn't been chosen as the answer to this question. – MikeD Dec 9 2010 at 2:10
4

Actually, some say it's important to eat breakfast if you have adrenal issues, like when they're so tanked they're unable to kick in in the morning. Fasting is suppose to contribute to and perpetuate the problem.

link|flag
3

I've recently started skipping breakfast save for a cup of coffee with heavy cream around 10am. Now I eat lunch at about 2-3pm, and dinner around 7-8pm. Never felt better! Much more energized and focused in the mornings.

link|flag
1 
"a cup of coffee with heavy cream" - looks like quite a decent Meal from my standpoint)) – gn Dec 7 2010 at 3:10
3

Before paleo and IF'ing I always emphasized a good hearty breakfast to start the day, especially for my kids. My 12yo won't eat lunch at school so I always make sure they have a solid breakfast - protein, fat, low/moderate carbs. I on the other hand, like to fast until 12-1pm and really have no issues with lack of energy or hunger headaches like I did prior to paleo.

link|flag
Yes, my daughter only gets about 15 minutes to eat and can never finish her lunch in the time provided. (You know she starts with the healthiest parts first too, right?) So eating breakfast is important for her. I try to get her to eat a couple hard boiled eggs and some bacon in the morning. – sherpamelissa Dec 7 2010 at 1:19
sorry but thats pretty shocking, only 15 minutes to eat!!!! – paleoboy May 17 2011 at 18:39
2

I am not hungry in the morning, so I don't bother. By the time lunch rolls around I am ready to pack it in. I like to eat when I'm hungry. I have come to trust my body to tell me what it needs, and it obviously doesn't need (or want) breakfast.

link|flag
2

That was a marketing slogan of oats, I think Quakers Oats early 50's.

Truth or fiction, beyond that I know nothing.

link|flag
It was Quaker or Kelloggs. Additionally, I think Kelloggs has been a huge donor to one of the Ivy League medical schools. – Jason Dec 6 2010 at 23:56
2

Personally, unless I am fasting, I find it to be important. I am one of those eat every 3 to 4 hour kind of people, though. My reasoning behind this is if I let myself get too hungry, then I have a tendency to make bad choices or overeat. It took me awhile to learn that about myself, but it was an important discovery to help with my food issues.

link|flag
1 
Sherp, Grazing every 3-4 hours has been said to not be optimal because you have not let your body digest and consume the food. It needs to rest between meals. Also, folks who eat carbs at every meal seem to need to eat more often. I carry a small jar of coconut oil with me that I add to my lunch so I get adequate fat to carry me through til the next meal. But I have been using the coconut oil less, since I upped by breakfast to 1/8 pound of bacon and 4 eggs fried in coconut oil. Dr Grace at drbganimalpharm.blogspot.com is a huge fan of coconut oil. Good blog she has. – Dexter Dec 7 2010 at 0:07
Thanks Dex, it's more of a personal issue for me, but I understand what you are saying and understand the science behind it. I start work at 7am, so have to bring my breakfasts and generally can't eat that much at one time sitting at my desk! I don't have carbs at every meal. It's worked well for me losing weight over the last 6 years, but I know the longer I do Paleo, the more I will probably be able to stretch my times between eating. – sherpamelissa Dec 7 2010 at 0:48
2

I have a morning cup of coffee, sometimes w/ heavy cream but nothing to eat until around noon. like to work out in the AM and then have an enormous meal afterwards. Been doing that for a couple of months now and I'm really enjoying it, I prefer to work out fasted and I don't notice any deficiencies from not eating right after I wake up.

link|flag
2

The only real evidence I've heard for it is epidemiological data that correlate lower body mass index with people who eat breakfast. Of course, correlation does not imply causation, but the outcome of that data has been the advice to not skip breakfast if you are trying to lose weight.

From a biological perspective, those many people out there now who can't easily switch to fat burning mode because they are so carb addicted would probably need to get that glucose fix in order function decently. I know personally, before paleo, I would tend to feel rather weak and almost sick if I didn't intake some food within a certain number of hours after waking. But now, although I will sometimes feel hungry if skipping breakfast, I won't feel any other symptoms nor any lack of energy. So I think there is a big difference in food intake needs for the carb addicted and/or unhealthy eater vs the paleo eater.

link|flag
1

Someone shouldn't worry about breakfast if they're not hungry. That said, it's important for me personally on most days because I'm essential coming off a 10-12 hour IF.

link|flag
you consider 10 to 12 hours an IF? Can you not fast longer, or you just don't want to? – mari Dec 6 2010 at 22:42
The longest I've went was ~26 hours, which I'll do every once in awhile. I don't know how many hours technically make an IF. I just meant the time between dinner and breakfast the next day. – Carl_Stawicki Dec 6 2010 at 22:45
ah ok. I asked because you said it was important, is this just a personal preference? – mari Dec 7 2010 at 0:14
1 
It's important to me because I'm hungry at breakfast time. – Carl_Stawicki Dec 7 2010 at 2:06
ok. thanks for clarifying – mari Dec 7 2010 at 2:28
show 1 more comment
1

Search for Intermittent Fasting or IF. It's actually really good for you to skip breakfast.

link|flag

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.