Blog

2

I've been experimenting with the two, and the amount of satiety that I get from an identical meal with potatoes is noticeably less than if I ate sweet potatoes instead. Seems like the potato starch is converted completely into glucose and thus causes a greater insulin response, but the fructose in the sweet potatoes should interfere with satiety as well. I keep testing it with the same result; anyone else experience this?

For what it's worth, I'm eating about 2 golfball-sized purple potatoes per day with a negligible amount of carbohydrates from other sources.

Edit: Interesting answers here. You know, it's funny because when I eat sweet potatoes I eat less food in general but I don't lose fat, but with potatoes I eat more food, more carbs but I lose fat. This must be the result of the higher fructose content in the sweet potatoes.

flag
Hmm I'm only eating them post workout during a feast, I may have to experiment here. – Stephen-Aegis Jan 17 2011 at 21:15
could this be a fiber to starch ratio? – Stephen-Aegis Feb 7 2011 at 16:23

4 Answers

1

Great question! My go-to expert in all things spud is Dr Kathleen DesMaisons @ radiantrecovery.com She has written about potatoes, satiety, and sweet potatoes causing a more gradual insulin rise which makes them more appropriate for those with diabetes, IF I'm remembering correctly.

link|flag
Interesting read from her. Raising serotonin using potatoes or sweet potatoes: radiantrecovery.com/potato_qna.htm – sean Jan 22 2011 at 10:57
1

It could be calories. Data is from nutritiondata.com and one website that had info on the purples is caloriegallery.com. But I remember from looking this up previously that purples definitely have fewer calories than russets.

Sweet potato (what you say you are eating) 100 grams = 90 calories

Yam (what you might actually be eating) 100 grams = 116 cals

Purple potato 100 grams = 82 cals

Russet potato (just to compare) 100 grams = 97 cals

2 'golf-ball' sized potatoes is barely anything and may even be less than these amounts listed.

link|flag
0

"I've been experimenting with the two, and the amount of satiety that I get from an identical meal with potatoes is noticeably less than if I ate sweet potatoes instead. Seems like the potato starch is converted completely into glucose and thus causes a greater insulin response, but the fructose in the sweet potatoes should interfere with satiety as well. I keep testing it with the same result; anyone else experience this?"

I'm much fuller after eating a sweet potato and for longer than a potato. Not even close.

link|flag
0

I have been recently adding in white potatoes (which my wife favors) after eating sweet potatoes as my main source of carbs for six months or so. I confess I have noticed zero difference.

link|flag

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.