Blog

8

1

Almonds contain a very high amount of Vitamin E, which we all know protects against oxidation. Many sources rank almonds in the top 5 or even top 3 for VitE content of all known foods. Can anyone provide a sound argument that defeats the idea that the antioxidants in almonds protects against PUFA oxidation, both outside and inside the body?

alt text

So my bounty expired. What happened? Did one of the 3 answers below win or something? I am not able to 'accept' any of the submitted answers.

flag
isnt the E destroyed if these are eaten anything but Raw? – Stephen-Aegis Mar 28 2011 at 21:56
maybe, but that's the only way i eat them anyway. i wouldn't touch roasted almonds. – Jack Kronk Mar 28 2011 at 23:17
Hi, Jack, I think that what happened was the following. Because you didn't accept any of the answers before the bounty period was up, the bounty was supposed to go automatically to the highest-voted answer. But there was no highest-voted answer, since all the answers had the same number of votes. So nothing happened. But the odd thing is that you did in fact lose the 50 points. Guess you could always try again, if that option is up there on your screen. – Paul Apr 1 2011 at 5:25
so basically, nothing happened. thanks for clarifying, Paul. I should at least be able to choose my favorite answer, at some point in time. – Jack Kronk Apr 1 2011 at 14:44
True, that is odd. You should still be able to accept an answer, bounty or not. But sometimes the Paleohacks software is a harsh mistress. – Paul Apr 1 2011 at 17:23

6 Answers

2

I agree with Majikinetor. Despite high omega 6 concentrations in nuts such as walnuts, I don't think it's paleo at all to start demonizing whole organic foods because of one element in these foods. That's like saying let's stop eating red meat because it's high in iron and too much iron is bad. Man has been eating raw nuts for ages. The whole idea of soaking and drying and all other kinds of special processing I think is for people who do not digest fresh raw nuts well and still want to enjoy them. The phytate and oxalate arguments are theoretical -- show me one person who has died from phytate or oxalate "poisoning" from consuming raw nuts.

I think the omega 3/omega 6 test (omega score I think it's called) is interesting but some questions: - are the results reproducible? how do we "know" what ratio of fatty acids our paleolithic ancestors had? does the test take into consideration that temperature changes affect fatty acid ratios in membranes -- warmer temps equal more saturated fat in tissues etc? how "paleo" is it to repeatedly test and examine one's blood ad nauseaum and constantly tweak micronutrient ratios etc etc etc based upon lab tests?

I have read all the stuff by Peat but wonder whether it isn't a tad nutty (forgive the pun) to start demonizing walnuts. Next thing you know, paleos will be dressed as walnuts or other high omega 6 nuts on Halloween...

link|flag
Nice. Phytate may be even beneficial: lewrockwell.com/sardi/sardi39.html – majkinetor Sep 29 2011 at 19:45
1

Yes, E will protect them.

This is also the reason that in all liquid fish oils you have some E or ascorbyl palmitate. I put extra 200 IU mixed tocopherols in my fish oil and keep it in fridge.

About PUFAs in almonds, and nuts in general, they seem to be protective. There are number of studies claiming that. They seem to prevent galstones, Mg deficiency, diabetes, promote DNK repair, fiber, rasveratrol, arginine etc. If you eliminate industrial PUFAs, those that you consume in nuts aren't going to overload your system.

Alpha says 30g of most of the nuts have low amount of PUFA, except walnut.

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=30g+almond+30g+brazil+nut+30g+cashew+30g+hazelnut+30g+walnut

(click on 'more' in fat section to see details and thank me later for letting you know about Alpha)

Brazil nut is, surprisingly, next on the list [looking at Quilt]. Not counting walnuts, you get at most 1 tea spoon of such non-processed oil so its easy to counter it with the same amount of w-3 PUFA.

However, young walnuts are rich source of Iodine and W-3 (ALA). In my country people make Rakija from young walnuts as Iodine supplementation which is very tasty.

To others that claim w-6 is inflammatory, keep in mind that w-6 IS essential fat. There are essential fats, amino acids AND probably carbohydrates on the long run.

Limit your industrialized food, not non-paleo-food whatever that might mean...

link|flag
But aren't all studies that show nuts are good for you short term studies? – ROB Sep 29 2011 at 21:06
No. aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/160/10/961.full ajcn.org/content/93/5/1073.abstract?etoc I know its correlation, but those are from head. Go to google scholar. – majkinetor Sep 29 2011 at 21:22
0

Don't forget about the different forms of vitamin E, the gamma form is apparently the most beneficial - If your going to do an E supplement I would recommend the gamma form be listed in there somewhere.

link|flag
1

Pufas deplete the body's stores of vitamin e, so getting vitamin e with your pufas is good. Getting pufas from almonds as opposed to corn oil is obviously better for this and other reasons. I would guess that the vitamin e in almonds protects against a fair amount of oxidation in the almond, but less so in the body. Our tissues are almost 100 degrees and constantly flooded with oxygen. This makes for a prime environment for oxidation. An almond in its whole form is not 100 degrees and is protected inside its shell. So I don't think that it will completely prevent against oxidation as that just seems very improbable.

Even if vitamin e does protect against oxidation fully though, Omega 6 is still inflammatory and will throw your 6/3 ratio off.

link|flag
1

I don't have the exact answer you're looking for. I know a few massage therapists that use almond oil, and will add vitamin E to it to prevent rancidity. They say it will go rancid on its own, though there isn't a time line since it really depends on the conditions it's being kept in, how and when it was produced.

And in labs, they have a positive effect on your LDL. How this applies to eating them though, I'm not sure.
http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?tname=foodspice&dbid=20
""We have identified a unique combination of flavonoids in almonds," said Jeffrey Blumberg, Ph.D., senior scientist and director of the Antioxidants Research Laboratory at Tufts University. "Further blood tests demonstrated that eating almonds with their skins significantly increases both flavonoids and vitamin E in the body. This could have significant health implications, especially as people age."

Blumberg's team tested the effects of almond skin's flavonoids alone and then in combination with the vitamin E found in almond meat on blood samples containing LDL cholesterol. While almond skin flavonoids alone enhanced LDL's resistance to oxidation by 18%, when almond meat's vitamin E was added, LDL's resistance to oxidation was extended by 52.5%! "

Also see: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17475462

I've been laying off nuts (mostly), but would buy the Italian raw ones, and soak and dehydrate them. I've stopped baking with almond flour too. Too bad, it tastes so damn good!

link|flag
2

I think this totally makes sense, but I don't think the irradiated, pasteurized almonds would bring the same benefits.

link|flag
Pasteurized? WTF. After googling, I can't believe what I'm reading :| – Casey Mar 21 2011 at 16:42
1 
Organic Pastures sells truly raw almonds for $12 per lb or $50 for 5 lbs. (that includes free shipping to anywhere in CA). Pricey, but worth it I think. – Jack Kronk Mar 21 2011 at 17:25
1 
I used to be a big almond consumer. More I read the more I now stay away from all nuts except macademia nuts and occassional pistachio. I also eat on brazil nut a day for the selenium. Its cheaper than the supplement. The other reason is I check my omega 6/3 ratio quarterly.......you start doing that and see the shocking numbers you get rid of nuts fast. – The Quilt Mar 21 2011 at 17:44
1 
"The Cornucopia Institute offers a great deal of information on the recent raw almond controversy, but all California grown almonds now have either chemical or high heat treatments. The change came after raw almonds were believed to be connected with two salmonella cases, although farming practices vary considerably and may have contributed to the problem." marksdailyapple.com/nuts – Carlos Mar 21 2011 at 19:28
1 
todays nuts aint the same nuts the Geico guys ate..... – The Quilt Mar 21 2011 at 21:03
show 6 more comments

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.