Blog

3

I read this NYT article featuring David Kessler a couple of years ago and it really resonated with me. Here's an excerpt giving the gist of things:

When it comes to stimulating our brains, Dr. Kessler noted, individual ingredients aren’t particularly potent. But by combining fats, sugar and salt in innumerable ways, food makers have essentially tapped into the brain’s reward system, creating a feedback loop that stimulates our desire to eat and leaves us wanting more and more even when we’re full.

Dr. Kessler isn’t convinced that food makers fully understand the neuroscience of the forces they have unleashed, but food companies certainly understand human behavior, taste preferences and desire. In fact, he offers descriptions of how restaurants and food makers manipulate ingredients to reach the aptly named “bliss point.” Foods that contain too little or too much sugar, fat or salt are either bland or overwhelming. But food scientists work hard to reach the precise point at which we derive the greatest pleasure from fat, sugar and salt.

The result is that chain restaurants like Chili’s cook up “hyper-palatable food that requires little chewing and goes down easily,” he notes. And Dr. Kessler reports that the Snickers bar, for instance, is “extraordinarily well engineered.” As we chew it, the sugar dissolves, the fat melts and the caramel traps the peanuts so the entire combination of flavors is blissfully experienced in the mouth at the same time.

Foods rich in sugar and fat are relatively recent arrivals on the food landscape, Dr. Kessler noted. But today, foods are more than just a combination of ingredients. They are highly complex creations, loaded up with layer upon layer of stimulating tastes that result in a multisensory experience for the brain. Food companies “design food for irresistibility,” Dr. Kessler noted. “It’s been part of their business plans.”

What is the paleo response to being in a world saturated with foods that combine fat, sugar, and salt to make these hyper-palatable foods?

It seems that fat constitutes the core of most of our diets, and we actively shun sugar, but I know of few folks on PaleoHacks who go out of their way to avoid salt - and in fact most of us probably add it to our food during or after cooking. Do we need all three (of sugar, salt, and fat) for something to be dangerously, addictively tasty, or does the presence of two of the three factors (salt and fat) pose any added physiological risk compared with eating just fat?

flag

4 Answers

4

Unrefined salt is a health food. It stimulates the release of enzymes involved in digestion, it provides the chloride part of HCl, it's involved with optimal adrenal function and cellular metabolism and it stimulates brain development in infants. Animals also pursue salt (salt licks).
Kessler's book stated the obvious regarding the conspiracy to get people to eat processed foods based on what we're hardwired to like.

Saturated fats are only healthy (it's the industrialized fats in the processed foods that are not) and proper, adequate consumption of them will eliminate the cravings for sugar and other refined carbohydrates (the body uses carbohydrates to make the saturated fat it needs if the saturated fats are not provided by the diet). If people are eating adequate amounts of saturated fats (what people are told to avoid) they won't be wanting the carbohydrates (refined or not) that Kessler says we're programmed to want.

link|flag
3

I think that Paleo IS the answer to hyper-palatable foods.

Once we take away the option of eating things cooked up by food chemists to taste especially good, we're sort of in the clear. Meaning that the more we eat whole foods, the longer we are able to go without stuffing our faces full of Doritos.

Paleo is like having a protective bubble around your tongue, intestine, and liver. Nothing is getting in that is not meant to get in. Some paleos already loved eating meat and vegetables and butter. Personally, I liked SAD snacks and desserts because they are hyperpalatable and make my tongue feel loved. Luckily, the longer I stick with paleo, the less enticing those other foods are. Diets that allow hyperpalatable foods implictly tempt you to binge. With paleo, it's more of a problem just getting enough (non butter) calories sometimes.

link|flag
1 
I think you're right, Kamal. I also wonder, though, about commonly described paleo indulgences like mashed sweet potatoes or regular mashed potatoes with (salted) butter - probably explains the enormous draw of those - you have easily-digested carbs (and the sugar-ish taste of the sweet potato) plus fat, plus salt. Mmmm! I just wonder if even paleo-friendly combos like that are satiation hijackers in disguise because they involve the triumvirate of taste sensations. I was thinking about any naturally-occurring food - and whether it has fat, salt, and sugars. Can't think of any - coincidence? – familygrokumentarian Apr 22 2011 at 19:27
1 
Good point. Buttery mashed potatoes involves sweet, salty, fatty, and easy to eat all in one bundle. Although, in my own head, I'm like "can't you just let me have this one indulgence, ye paleo gods?!!?" – Kamal Apr 22 2011 at 19:53
Great answer, Kamal. – Angelo - Latest in Paleo Apr 23 2011 at 2:50
2

Combining them certainly makes food yummier. I can't say that plain fruit or plain meat is particularly addictive flavor-wise - he probably has something there. Although if you're full no amount of delicious food will sway you to eat. Overeating likely has just as much if not more to do with a breakdown in our satiety signaling, namely leptin. This is where people go wrong with their entirely psychological (I count senses as psychological) explanations of modern problems. I could go and make some delicious salty pineapple pork that rivals any processed food in flavor, but I'm full. When I do I'll enjoy it but once you're satisfied and full that's it for the eating.

As for business, jea of course if you make food yummier people will be "addicted" in the sense that worse food is undesirable, prompting them to choose the yummier food and feel sad if they have to settle for less. But this is a very loose definition of addiction, it more or less means preference. I think if I had no other choice than to eat plain meat and plain fruit I would just learn to enjoy that just as much. Comparison of different activities is less meaningful when they can't be experienced consecutively. If given the chance I'll listen to metal 9 times out of 10 and enjoy it greatly, but if all that is playing is good-quality hip-hop the difference probably won't bug me.

link|flag
1 
I think someone might dispute that Kessler actually observes full people who want to eat more, but I would dispute whether he really observes satiety or if someone just ate a ton of food and we think "oh man, he must be full" and he says his stomach is bursting and full. That's not necessarily satiety, satiety manifests itself psychologically in the brain too and says "no more!" – Stabby Apr 22 2011 at 17:10
2

Every culture on earth has food taboos. Whether it comes from our genes or our upbringing, every single one of us has a feeling of "right" and "wrong" about food. What those rules are depend entirely on the culture, and can change rapidly when exposed to new ideas, but once something gets into that taboo category the thought of eating it produces an immediate and visceral reaction.

"Here's your plate of sheep's offal, Mr. SAD."

"Mrs. Vegan, I'm glad you're enjoying your french fries. They're cooked in the finest lard."

"Miss Paleo, would you like some partially-hydrogenated soybean oil on your steak?"

"No, Rabbi, this isn't imitation crab meat."

"Soylent Green is people!"

Etc. The reaction isn't just "oh no, I broke the rules." It's a full-on gut-wrenching squick.

My suspicion, though I have no research to back it up, is that this is an instinct that evolved parallel to language use. We avoid foods that the people around us think are disgusting. As the attitudes around us change, often so do our own. That's partly why sites like PaleoHacks exist, to hack our instinct for taboo with like-minded community support.

It's also why we have to police ourselves with good science and pay attention to the evolving body of evidence to keep from falling into unhealthy dogmatic practices.

So the solution, at a community level, is to engage with like-minded people, practice healthy eating, inform anyone who wants to learn and let the culture grow on its own. Instinct will take care of the rest.

link|flag

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.