Blog

9

1

quiltman whens the long awaited blog coming??????????

flag
1 
 Maybe you should ask him directly, instead of making a question? – mari May 28 2011 at 20:52
12 
 No---I like that you asked on here --this way all of us can see the answer – KL May 28 2011 at 20:53
3 
 I am glad this question was asked, too. Have you tried asking someone a question directly on here? Not always easy. – Thomas Seay May 28 2011 at 20:56
Fair enough. . – mari May 29 2011 at 17:34
What's the asperand for? – Wozza May 30 2011 at 0:31
show 3 more comments

7 Answers

7

Blogs are written.....website not. Frustrating to the max. But it is what it is

link|flag
1 
 Looking forward to the end of frustration then.. – Resurgent May 29 2011 at 2:55
1 
 Will you please inform us when the website is up? Thanks a lot – The hacker formerly knownasron May 29 2011 at 5:22
3 
 will do. It will be at www.jackkruse.com URL that is. The blog will be different that youre used to in design. The first blog will be real real long. It is my treatise in how I look at health and longevity. It outlines 30 levees of longevity. It is the skeleton of how I think a human should strive to live to protect the cell. Levee one concept is so simple but in medicine circles the implication are huge. It requires a complete change in paradigm to how we view disease. Without this thought change you will not understand the intent. This blog is for people not doctors. – The Quilt May 29 2011 at 14:02
1 
 As I add blogs, in the manner your used to at the other paleo sites they will add to the document......hence the Name the QUILT. As time goes by you will have a document that grows vertically horizontally and in detail. The depth will go from 30000 ft on science all the the way to thrid grade concepts. Many people think the lay public hates in depth science and they told me to shy away from that approach. My intuition says otherwise. The blogs will all hyperlink back to the original document to show the reader how this ties together to the entire picture. The more you read the more you know – The Quilt May 29 2011 at 14:06
1 
 I have many other plans for the website as I roll it out but it will be developed as my readers see fit. This is a very big departure from what I had intended to do.....but I decided to change things based upon the feedback I got here and on FB and other sites I visit. My goal is to change my profession using your help via my site. The more you know the more you can direct your care and effect the change I want to see in my profession. Right now they dont want to change. They dont see what I see or what you want cause they have not thought of how to effect that change in our system. – The Quilt May 29 2011 at 14:09
show 6 more comments
7

dr k. you sure have been taking a whole lot of flack lately. it's like these guys think you are grass fed beef or something. trying to eat you alive.

from my observation, dr k has participated on paleohacks in a pretty decent manner. he seems to be very strongly opinionated. i know i certainly don't agree with him all the time, but jiminy christmas folks, ease up.

if you want to pick on someone, pick on personman. (by the way... super odd side note there... i've often wondered if dr k is actually personman. that would throw this into another realm if it were true)

at any rate... yes i see the reasoning for patrik to implement the new rules for titles like "Dr" and professional credentials. it makes sense. if we take doc at his word, and hang on everything he says cause he's a "Doc", then paleohacks could turn into a quack site pretty quickly.

a number of his recommendations might be discomforting to some, but so are mine. i don't agree with taking high quantities of fish oil and resveratrol, but you know what... some people think i'm looney because they found out that i soak oats. so big deal.

fact is.. he contributes. i've seen his comment sparring with chris masterjohn and he seems to have quite an intricate understanding of the human body and nutrition, and he is definitely not a mainstream doc if he really is one.

so for now... "the quilt" it is. or whatever. fine with me.

link|flag
1 
 judging by Dr. K's weight loss, and PersonMan's photo, the chances of them being related are slim – DudleyP May 29 2011 at 10:41
4 
 All I ask is that if a person is going to make recommendations or specific claims that they provide some reference about where they got the idea. I really couldn't care less about whether the person is a doctor or not, because I prefer empirical evidence to authority-based arguments. – Ambimorph May 29 2011 at 13:53
3 
 What if Jack Kronk is the same person as PersonMan?!? OMG! – Casey May 29 2011 at 14:07
4 
 Jack youre going to learn from me when I make an omega three clain or a resveratrol claim.....its based upon the context I put it in then.....if you generalize that concept then you have erred in your thought to intrepret what you thought I said. Omega threes and resveratrol have context too. And I have many patients no longer on either because we fixed their original biochemical problems. When your broken. you may need a new tool to fix it. this is where me and Kurt Harris will differ. Eating clean sometimes wont fix all problems. It will fix many but I want straight A's not a B,C, or D – The Quilt May 29 2011 at 14:19
2 
 Looking only at biochemical and physiological mechanisms is a decent way to explain known phenomena or to generate hypotheses. It is not, however, a reliable way to predict outcomes. If a randomized, controlled study gives a certain set of results, not even a major paradigm shift in science or any new discovery can change those results, it can only change the interpretation. Interpretations are "cooked", results are results. If you don't buy into evidence based medicine, and rely only on clever story-telling, you are risking your health on shaky ground. – Ambimorph May 29 2011 at 14:52
show 8 more comments
4

The blog is now live......www.jackkruse.com

link|flag
1

Has "our" Dr. K something to do with this Dr. K (dr. Datis Kharrazian): http://drknews.com/about/ ?

link|flag
i surely doubt it. – Jack Kronk May 29 2011 at 8:22
1 
 No. His name is Jack Kruse. – Wozza May 29 2011 at 9:25
Yah wasn't he on Jimmy's show the other day? – Jack Kronk May 29 2011 at 11:13
4 
 not the same guy......he is a chiro and I am a neurosurgeon......if you feel the need to come touch my flesh to make sure I am who you thought I was come see me. But bring your MRI's and leave your dogma at the door. – The Quilt May 29 2011 at 14:13
0

Hi everybody. This is Dr. K, in the flesh.

link|flag
0

That is the guy whos says running will kill you right?

link|flag
1 
 not running......marathoning. Sprints will save you. If youre going to quote me use the correct words and context. – The Quilt May 29 2011 at 16:36
2 
 What % of marathoners actually suffer ill health effects from it? Just out of curiosity at what volume do you think you start to suffer health effects? – Lance May 29 2011 at 19:47
1 
 100 percent according to the article I posted here last month. It has shocked the professional trainers I work with with elite athletes. – The Quilt May 29 2011 at 23:34
1 
 I tell my patients based on current data we don't know but I would not run past a 5 k distance – The Quilt May 29 2011 at 23:35
1 
 I completely agree that long distance running is unhealthy. I walked one half. At 68, I don't think I would ever run a half even if I could. However, the 12 lifelong endurance runners had done at least 100 marathons. That is far beyond what the typical marathoner does. – Harry Jun 4 2011 at 5:50
show 5 more comments
0

http://www.thelivinlowcarbshow.com/shownotes/4119/474-dr-jack-kruse-low-carb-neurologist/

The Quilt!

link|flag
1 
 PS: the sun is NOT the center of the universe, Dr. K. You said that on the podcast and I feel the duty to correct you. :) – Kirik May 29 2011 at 19:33
I know......my kid pointed it out as well......but I think the point was received no? Lol – The Quilt May 29 2011 at 23:33

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.