I spotted a frozen 4 x 125 grams - package of wild pacific salmon in one of my weekly grocery stores. The species was Chum Salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), aka dog salmon. The fat content per 100 g was only 4 grams, as opposed to "regular" salmon's 12-16 grams of fat per 100 grams. Would a salmon with a fat content this low useful at all, in the sense of getting my omega 3 fix?
|
1
|
according to selfNutritionData Fish, Salmon, Chum, raw (Alaska Native) per 100g; Fat 3.7g Saturated 0.5g Monounsaturated 0.9g Polyunsaturated 0.8g Omega 3 670mg Omega 6 30mg |
||||||
|
|
0
|
Wild salmon varities have lower fat content than it's farmed brothers. Anchovies for Omega3 (1256mg per 100g, Nutrition data) would be better in your case. |
||||||||||||
|
|
0
|
Is it from the tail? Never buy the tail. Always middle cut, most fat and best flavor. This is only possible in fish market tho :( |
||
|
|
