Many arguments for paleo eating rely on an evolutionary biology, i.e. we ate a certain way for x number of years and therefore are not adapted to neolithic foods. But, as Kurt Harris has written, not all evolutionarily novel foods are automatically unhealthy (I think he gives the example of butter or maybe for the lactose intolerant we could say ghee). As a heuristic model, deeming neolithic foods unhealthy is probably the easiest route to a non-inflammatory paleo diet. My question is, though, what evolutionarily novel foods would factor into a diet of health and longevity?
|
5
|
I have neither seen nor experienced any evidence that would suggest that 100% whey protein (typically derived from the manufacture of yogurt or cheese) is detrimental to health. In fact, it has been found to be suitable not only for athletes, but cancer patients and individuals suffering from a wide range of chronic and infectious diseases. http://www.megawecare.co.th/file/research/Therapeutic%20Applications%20of%20Whey%20Protein_36.pdf |
|||||||||||
|
|
5
|
Check out our "but is it paleo" tag for a number of fun and delicious debates about foods that fall in that special part of Dr. Harris's concentric circles: neolithic, but good for your paleolithic "metabolic milieu." The tag may ask "is it paleo" but the discussions ask "is it good." Including: Yuca. And, if you want to push the envelope: Eggs. -- But my best direct answer to your question is: New World tubers, like potatoes, or New World animals, like .... jaguars? |
||
|
|
|
2
|
I know this could be argued but some studies have shown dark chocolate and red wine to be beneficial in small amounts. I know mark Sisson would agree with the benefits and they are definitely Neolithic! |
||
|
|
|
1
|
Healthy neolithic foods would be raw milk for the Swiss and Masais. I'm assuming that all tubers (potatoes, yams, yuca, etc.) are Paleolithic. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
