Blog

10

One of my classes is involved in an ongoing food collection campaign for poor elementary students. We're supposed to bring in items for them and it started me thinking about poverty and the standard American diet, as well as the implications of our actions in regards to our belief systems.

The items collected for food drives are almost entirely low(er) quality than paleo principles recommend. Most of them are highly processed and derived from neolethal (stole that from someone on here) foods (e.g. wheat).

While grains are obviously a few steps above starvation, do paleo minded people have a responsibility to provide paleo friendly foods in these situations? Would it be hypocritical of me to take a box of ramen noodles? Am I endorsing the legitimacy of foods as a nutritional choice by providing it to someone, or does it come with an opt-out of (1) they still choose to eat it, and (2) it's better than the alternative of nothingness. Do I have a responsibility to only give things to others that I would eat myself?

Outside of canned vegetables, nuts, and jerky, what kind of long-lasting in storage, food-drive-friendly foods would fit the paleo lifestyle?

flag
3 
A question that makes me think yet I don't have an answer for. We can't solve the world's hunger issues (even in our own back yards) but we can give what we can in the immediate situation. Most of us here are truly lucky/blessed to be able to pick and choose our foods that we feel is optimal to our health. Others must live by what they can get. I would give rice, tuna, canned vegetables I guess and hope that these folks can get out of their situations at some point and have the luxury of choosing better food for them when they can. – Karin Jun 27 2011 at 16:40
1 
Thanks Eric for asking a great question. This is something I've struggled with as well so I appreciate the discussion. – Shari Bambino Jun 27 2011 at 20:41

5 Answers

5

I've had family here for the last week--my husband's niece and her 2 kids.

Consider this: I cook supper for everyone in this household (normally 7; this week 10). I regularly serve a meat and 2 vegetables. Our visitors pick at the meat, won't touch any veggie other than potatoes, and consider ketchup a vegetable. They drink soda and "juice" drinks non-stop throughout the day, and have potato chips, cookies/donuts/etc, and individual bags of chex mix to munch on.

You might feel bad about giving something to a charity that you don't even consider to be food, but if what I see in family and classmates from school is the norm, then what are the chances that what you would like to give would actually end up in the hands of someone who would eat it? Most people eat crap. I've had the experience more than once this year where I've served meals of real food, only to have our "guests" run right out and grab their bags of crap and bottles of sugar, because that's what they want. That's what they consider to be food.

Give whatever makes you feel better, but seriously, most people don't eat like you do.

link|flag
1 
Good Lawd, I think this is an unfortunate, and yet very spot on comment. – Fred B Jun 27 2011 at 18:14
true true true. poor people want the 'food' they see on tv. just like rich people. – g. Jun 27 2011 at 18:16
2 
I hate hate hate this reasoning. I agree - it's very true of the vast majority of people utilizing these programs. But there are people who cannot utilize food distribution programs because there is so little there that they can or want to eat (is it worth it to wait in line for hours for a single can of tuna?). Why not give with these people in mind? It's HARD to raise a family with good nutrition while low income, and doing what you can to support those who are conscientious enough to make nutrition a priority can help break the cycle. – jess6 Jun 27 2011 at 18:32
1 
I agree with Jess too, but what exactly is nutritionally sound that comes in a package, and might really get used by a conscientious family? Canned fish? Ok. I bet theyre going to want some bread and mayo to eat with that. Do you think they want the $6 non-soy mayo? No, they do not. They want Kraft (low-fat). – g. Jun 27 2011 at 21:29
1 
And generally speaking, people don't get to choose what they take home from the pantry. So even if that coconut oil you donated somehow serendipitously ends up in the hands of a 'healthy eater', the likelihood of it being used is slim. Very slim. It's a conundrum for sure. I really don't mean to sound so cynical... it's just that lot of poor people 'round my hood eat flamin' hot cheetos for breakfast. – g. Jun 27 2011 at 21:33
show 3 more comments
4

I've pondered this as well. It occurs to me that you could give sealed coconut, nuts, butters, and oils. Since I can't afford such things, I would give cans of tuna, bags of rice (better than wheat at least), and chicken stock.

Even better, if you can give cash, the food pantries use it to buy fresh meats, dairy, and veggies.

link|flag
We are essentially the food pantry. My professor started collecting food for students she would see when she visited schools and delivering it directly to the schools to distribute to the students. Students take it to their homes. I like the idea of tuna and wild rice. I can't afford such things either. – Eric Jun 27 2011 at 21:16
+1 for listing some possible items. I wondered not about what people would eat but what the food drive would accept as a food donation. Most don't want fresh food donations or any of the other fresh stuff paleos eat. I especially like the idea of nut butters and canned tuna. Both good options that SAD people might try and like and not have to learn to cook to eat. – wood Jun 28 2011 at 3:47
1

Canned meats and fish are what come to mind other than what you mentioned. I would also have a problem giving SAD food.

link|flag
0

Robb Wolfe said to give them the grains and help the population problem!

link|flag
If that was the issue, wouldn't it be faster, cheaper, and easier to lace them with actual poison? – Sara Jun 27 2011 at 17:01
0

I would ask the food bank you are collecting for. Shelf stable is a real challenge with real food.

On the plus side it looks like food banks in your area are getting perishable food donations from walmart as part of their big end hunger program.

I am told one of the challenges in using these food donations is that they take more time and skill to prepare, you might be able to make a meaningful know how and time contribution to make real food that is already donated actually accessible.

link|flag
Thank you for the end hunger information. Did not know about that. Shared it with my professor/class. Maybe the university can forge a connection. – Eric Jun 27 2011 at 21:25

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.