Blog

7

Title basically sums it up. Even if I see someone who looks really good, as soon as I see them eating grains I automatically get a little paleo snooty in my head and think theres no way they can be healthy, or at least optimal healthy, eating grains. Am I wrong?

flag
1 
No.. you aren't wrong. – CaveDad Jul 15 2011 at 18:32
5 
Danielle, you would be mistaken. We cannot make assumptions about another's health based on what we see them eating. If you saw me in person and eating a perfect paleo meal you would not realize that I have multiple sclerosis and was once in a wheelchair, nor would you know that I once had to treat my IDDM with insulin 3x a day. You would assume, so that 42 year old guy is really fit and healthy, that's why he gets to tell the 20 something girls..."no thanks, I'm very married"... The same way, if you saw me in the same body, same clothes, eating at McDonalds... how could you make health – Andy Jul 15 2011 at 19:02
3 
assumptions? Generally speaking though, I know a great many very fit people who eat SAD who actually are in optimal health, and can back that up with perfect lab work. The question is, how long will they stay that way? – Andy Jul 15 2011 at 19:03
3 
hmm. I think nobody who is eating SAD can be in perfect health. I will take my chances with lab numbers and what I eat versus swapping out for supposedly 'better' lab numbers on a fully SAD diet and presumed state of good health anyday. – Jack Kronk Jul 15 2011 at 19:11
2 
Is Michael Phelps unhealthy? And yet he eats fried egg sandwiches and pancakes for breakfast (if you can trust the reporting). Maybe it will affect him over time, maybe not. Djokevic (the tennis player) credits his becoming number 1 this year to dumping bread and pasta. But he was still really good (#3) before the diet change. Everone's tolerance is different, although maybe they could be healthier dumping grains (sounds like we need a study for this). – Dave S. Jul 15 2011 at 19:22
show 6 more comments

19 Answers

2

Eating grains does not equal SAD.

Hope the paleo police didn't see me munching on that organic-non-gmo-fried in lard-corn chip last night...

link|flag
BLASPHEMOUS! chows down on buckwheat pancake – Phoenix Jul 16 2011 at 23:42
Oh, I already saw you eating the grains on youtube – The Loon Jul 19 2011 at 14:32
3

Your asking the wrong question.

The REAL question is, can someone who's eating a SAD diet improve their health by shifting to paleo.

I think we know the answer to that. ;)

link|flag
1

It's wrong to assume they're not healthy because they might be doing so many other things that enhance their health.

However, when I see someone eating food that lacks nutrition or might threaten health status, I feel bad for them because I know how much better I've felt these past 2 years GFCF. And I am not lactose intolerant. I am not a celiac. I simply dropped the 2 industry favorite food groups and experienced a much much higher quality of life.

I wish everyone made a conscientious effort to optimize their health and lifestyle. The payoff is so rewarding but I realize that there are too many vested interests who will never make it easy for anyone to make all the right choices.

How can you make good choices when you are surrounded by bad ones the instant you set foot in a supermarket? It's a minefield.

The situation overall is very saddening to me.

It just sucks.

link|flag
1 
i feel the sentiment. especially with one's family. you know yourself how much better you are but you see loved ones actually hurting themselves again and again. – ben61820 Jul 16 2011 at 21:00
2

I'm of the opinion that if someone were vegan except for the fact that they eat liver frequently and in sufficient quantities, they'd have better nutrition than the average meat-eater who does not or even the average paleo person who does not.

link|flag
i think you're pretty spot on there. – ben61820 Jul 16 2011 at 20:59
3

Yes I think it's totally wrong to think that anyone who eats grains is unhealthy. Ridiculous in fact, since the facts are all around us. There are millions (billions?) around the globe who consume grains and are healthy.

And making believe that you are healthier because you don't eat grains than others who do is silly. There are a myriad of factors that affect us.

link|flag
1 
Chalk one up. Billions of Chinese can't be wrong. But then they eat mostly white rice, a safe starch. – Namby Pamby Jul 16 2011 at 15:36
6

Wrong or not, I'd say spend more energy worrying about you and yours, instead of judging people. Surely your time is worth more than that.

link|flag
0

Generally, people that consume whole grains tend to follow an overall healthier lifestyle than those who succumb to the allure of processed junk and fast food. So in a sense they are overall healthier than most of the general population but it isn't optimal by any means.

link|flag
6

I'm beginning to think that there are many paths to health and longevity. Paleo also means different things to different people. You're mistaken if you believe your brand of Paleo is monopolizing longevity.

Low carb / high carb / low fat / high fat / low protein / ad libertum protein.

The main thing is that you're eating whole foods. Can vegetarians attain longevity? Yes, I think so, why not. You're missing some fatty acids but you can always supplement. I've seen those who eat plant-based diets live for a very long time.

Again, there is no single way.

link|flag
Well said. Paleo isn't by anyways the only way to attain good health. – ROB Jul 15 2011 at 23:16
3

What are you basing your judgement on?

I would not judge them on health anyway. My ancestors lived to 70-80 overweight, proably with metabolic syndrome, eating all the dairy and grain they liked, and died of strokes and heart attacks. I have no problem judging their behavior. However my parents eat the same thing but are active and much fitter in their mid 80's. While I may consider their bland diet of cookies, margarine and miracle whip to be in poor taste, it would be stupid for me to criticize their health. I should be so healthy at 85.

link|flag
6

I find that people have the same thoughts about me, not eating grains....So I guess its what you believe in and should know that diet is just as personal to people as politics and religion!

I don't discuss those either, adding diet to the list as well!

link|flag
1 
Thanks, Kelly. I needed to be reminded not to discuss diet. Pretty soon I won't have any nose left from sticking it into other peoples diet worldview and getting it cut off. – Doris Jul 16 2011 at 12:14
I guess you could say my nose has been hacked off as well! People get so defensive when they don't understand things it seems. I just give up!! They still ask but I just don't really engage them anymore. – Kelly Jul 16 2011 at 13:48
1

I think there is a spectrum of health and people have different sensitivities to grains and legumes. We all know somebody who lived to 80 or 90 who ate some grains but that doesn't mean their health couldn't be better! They might have some mild osteoporosis, allergies, or other marks of inflammation, etc. I personally don't want to wait until a certain age and get some diagnosis of metabolic syndrome, cancer, autoimmune disease, Alzheimers, etc - I prefer to take action now. Some people don't know their best until they go grain-free and legume-free.

link|flag
1

[T]heres no way they can be ... optimal healthy, eating grains. Am I wrong?

Completely right, I think. It would be an odd person indeed who was optimally healthy in virtue of eating grains, that is, there is nothing they could be eating that would be more healthy than grains. But that's quite a weak claim, though I suppose, important to bear in mind, if you want reminders that there's no reason to eat (or not, not eat) grains.

Is it wrong to think that anyone who eats grains is not healthy?

I think this is not so much wrong as an unfortunately formed question. We don't want to know "Is any-one who lies/cheats/steals not a good person," since "good person" like healthy person admits of great variation and controversy. We want to know "is lying/cheating/stealing good?"

link|flag
34

Definitely wrong! Confirmation bias is strong in the paleo echo-chamber.

The more I read about omega-6, the more I thought it was the most important health issue that no one is talking about. The more I read about sugar and cancer, the more conspiracy theories I cooked up. When I worked at a meditation research center, I thought that was the be all and end all for maintaining health. When I'm in a forest, it occurs to me that living in concrete jungles is under-rated as a cause of death.

The issue de jour always takes the forefront in one's brain. If only life were so simple. There are many factors in maintaining health, and several very important non-diet issues. I doubt that someone who eats bread every day but eats in moderation, chillaxes, and has a strong support network would classify as "unhealthy". Unless they were more gluten intolerant than average.

link|flag
1 
This sums it up: "If only life were so simple." It's not, and the more complex the individual, the more complex the life, usually. Well said. – Albert Jul 15 2011 at 18:54
Nice answer. We should all ascribe to having such a perspective. – Tom R. Jul 16 2011 at 1:53
1 
And we should all ascribe to being comfortable enough to treat ourselves to PB ice cream on a Friday night. – Tom R. Jul 16 2011 at 2:42
well said, Kamal – Resurgent Jul 16 2011 at 4:51
1 
We have a lot of inputs - diet is just one. "Chillaxing" should be scribbled on a prescription pad once in a while.. – none Jul 17 2011 at 1:07
2

We can make presumptions about other's health based upon our own experience and research; but just like I can't know my own blood, lipid, and adrenal markers by looking in the mirror, I can't know other people's health markers just by looking at them.

And regarding what they eat, often - as someone else mentioned - the dose makes the poison.

link|flag
3

Perhaps.

link|flag
Well played... ;) – gilliebean Jul 15 2011 at 18:51
1 
Good points. "No grain" is a gateway drug to "Eating healthy". – Kamal Jul 15 2011 at 19:26
5

You might need more data before deciding how unhealthy they are being.

Never forget the differences between grain types AND the dose/amount and related frequency.

Do they have rice with sushi once a month?

or

Do they eat cracked wheat salad 6 times a day?

link|flag
3

Pretty much. There are lots of people who eat grains who live healthy long lives. Diet is just one variable in health.

link|flag
1 
I know very little people who are healthy at 70+ though. Meds like candy and a whole zoo of various diseases. – Ikco Jul 15 2011 at 19:20
3 
Every healthy person I know over 70 eats grains. – WaveHunter Jul 15 2011 at 20:14
6

I admit that I raise an eyebrow from time to time when I see healthy folks eating grains and the like. But I also remind myself that I am no evolutionary biology expert and that person's ability to ingest grains may be remarkably better than my own.

I just trust in the knowledge I have to keep myself happy and healthy. If anyone else is curious, I definitely welcome questions. Otherwise I just gauge the situation and try not to get preachy.

I'm always going to be a student when it comes to my own nutrition and health.

link|flag
2

Wrong or right, I'm beginning to feel this too. Also, when I see a fat, ageing couple, and both have health problems, I tend to think "I bet they eat grains, and sugar, and seed oils"

Bad news, really. It feels a bit like hubris....

link|flag
1 
And seed oils lol. Here's what I tend to think when I see two people like that: "I bet they eat a lot of junk food and don't exercise." Seems a bit simpler, eh? – Anonymous Coward Jul 15 2011 at 18:47

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.