Blog

1

Every once in a while I'll see an old photograph documenting Native American food preservation methods. The one that comes to mind was off a woman hanging fish out to dry in Alaska. My first thought seeing it was, "Holy crap, bears are going to eat that up in a second!" We now have to use bear cans and the like to keep them out of our rations while camping or they'll destroy our whole campsite. What changed?

flag

3 Answers

1

The dogs hanging around the village would probably have run any bears off. In one of the books on dogs that I've read -- might have been "The Wolf in The Parlor"? -- the author talks about being in an African village one night when the word came that a lion was prowling nearby. The village dogs kept the lion from raiding the village's livestock pens.

link|flag
That makes a lot of sense, well fed dogs are loyal protectors. Thanks for the answer. – Happy Now Jul 24 2011 at 5:53
6

Things changed because hunter-gatherers, over millennia, "trained" large predators to fear humans and their tools.

The Hadza and lions are a classic example.

"We would look for lion kills on the basis of where vultures are landing," O'Connell recalls of one stay with the Hadza, "and then walk up and try to take the kill from the lions.... That can be very scary, walking up with a Hadza man when there are several lions and hyena on the kill, and it's just you and your camera and him and his one bow. And he is fully confident he is going to take that meat away. He has no doubt. We watched Hadza hunters get meat this way 20 times, and each time they drove off the lions." What if the lion doesn't back off? "That happened one time," O'Connell says. "The lion got killed and eaten." A wise lion knows the Hadza are masters of the bush.

From http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0813/p18s02-hfks.html/%28page%29/3

Another interesting observation is that ecosystems where an animal didn't have human or other terrestrial predators in its evolutionary history -- ergo, would not be "trained" to fear humans, would suffer disastrous consequences when found by humans as they did not fear them. The ne plus ultra of this would undoubtedly be The Dodo.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodo

link|flag
That is bad ass! If I was that photographer, I'm guessing I would have needed a change of pants. Good info. I've always thought of bow hunting as being mostly a hide and wait deal, not, "Hi lion, fork it over!" – Happy Now Jul 16 2011 at 4:12
2

Human population density.

Even if a village dried fish everyday, it pales in comparison to the amount of edible garbage that is left in trash cans. Also, the village probably moved a bit or at least the location of the drying racks, but I'll bet the trashcans/campsites located in some of the parks have been there since day 1. Fixed location of garbage helps to increase the population of the bears and momma bear can show baby bear where to get easy food.

Finally, in the day of those pictures, bears were probably hunted or at least an attempt was made to kill them when they raided the drying racks, today people take pictures and say "how cute."

link|flag
I think the second part is more accurate. Our fishing spots had smooth spots on the rocks where fishermen's feet had stood for millenia. I'm sure the campsites were never far from there. – lil' Richard frm tx fan Jul 16 2011 at 2:30
Somehow it slipped my mind that bears were once food to, and any bear getting too close to a human catch would likely find themselves being similarly preserved. – Happy Now Jul 16 2011 at 5:22

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.