Blog

26

7

Q: What's potentially the most common answer on paleohacks, to any given question?

A: "I wouldn't worry about it...just avoid gluten, excess omega-6, and excess sugar/fructose and you'll be fine."

One problem: Horsemen come in groups of four. Only three have been made famous as of yet...is there a fourth out there? Consider these candidates, and tell me which one does the most damage to the health of Americans. Or bring up a dark horse. Or is the fourth horseman not a nutrient, but something else toxic? Too much internet, mayhaps?

Please briefly explain why your horseman is so so bad for health, happiness, and/or longevity.

  • Excessive food reward
  • Subclinical micronutrient deficiencies
  • Sterile environment
  • Lack of sunshine/air
  • Lectins
  • Nighshades
  • Casein
  • Pesticides
  • Alcohol
  • Stress
  • Trans fat
  • Preservatives
  • AGEs
  • Lack of sleep
flag
3 
Exercise is a powerful tool too. I know you just consider making love to beautiful women 10 times a day to be adequate but most of us decide to do exercise exercise. Do we really have to limit it to 4? What about another number? – Stabby Aug 9 2011 at 1:49
7 
I'm sorry, I deleted the rationale for having four horsemen. That number is clearly backed up by not only the Bible, but also The Four Horsemen from WCW wrestling in the early 80's (Arn Anderson, Ric Flair, etc) and The Four Horsemen from the old days of Notre Dame football. Apocolypse, popular X-Men villain, also had four horsemen. Have my nerdy and strange distractions made you forget your question yet? – Kamal Aug 9 2011 at 2:02
7 
You know I'd have to guess that bad spelling is going to kill us way before the first three. – thhq Aug 9 2011 at 2:16
4 
Digging on the WCW ref but then you pulled out the Apocolypse..good stuff. Lack of movement is my vote btw. Americans are sedentary lazy shits – ben61820 Aug 9 2011 at 2:17
2 
That's a deep question! I'm leaning towards causation. Those beautiful, glamorous X-Men have no obese members. I'd be mad at them too. The crazy-looking people (Green Goblin, Two Face, Newt Gingrich) always end up being villains. – Kamal Aug 9 2011 at 2:29
show 8 more comments

31 Answers

1 2 next
38

I'd say excessive STRESS.

link|flag
2 
Definitely a +1. We need to get out of the zoo. – MF Aug 9 2011 at 1:18
1 
I'm with Dragonfly. Stress. – Vern Aug 9 2011 at 1:27
1 
I agree with this one and think it will eventually lead to my undoing if I can't figure out how to calm down. – HeatherC Aug 9 2011 at 1:35
1 
So I'm taking this is emotional/mental stress? Tis good. – JayJay Aug 9 2011 at 1:49
show 2 more comments
26

The fourth horseman is not a nutrient, it's lack of sleep, acronym LoS.

link|flag
2 
oogity boogity, good one – Kamal Aug 9 2011 at 1:18
2 
When I see LoS I think "line of sight." as in... I'm doing a line of sight tank pull in this MMORPG dungeon. Hahahaha. My neediness knows no bounds. – Aughra Aug 9 2011 at 3:07
4 
Or nerdiness... Damn autocorrect. Always telling everyone how I really feel. ToT – Aughra Aug 9 2011 at 3:08
show 1 more comment
23

Orthorexia Nervosa. Stop hacking and start living.

  • Why are my dumps so smelly on Paleo?
  • At what macronutrient ratio does my unit look bigger
  • Is polygamy Paleo (yes it is BTW)
  • Etc etc

End Hypocrisy...I'll own it. Really, I'm here on PH just to be a jack ass and to score the chicks. Mission accomplished.

link|flag
1 
Which part...oh yeah. All of it! – Aravind Aug 9 2011 at 1:44
9 
Etc is not paleo - it is latin - a Latin expression meaning "and other things" or "and so on". Either that or it means ETC (magazine), a leftist Swedish magazine OR Earl Thomas Conley, an American country music singer and composer OR Eric Theodore Cartman, a character on South Park. This all came from Wikipedia so it is true. – none Aug 9 2011 at 2:19
2 
I thought that there were some societies that gathered harems, but they were actually communities of women who "let" a man in to provide the needed seed. I could be confusing this with Knot's Landing though. – none Aug 9 2011 at 2:38
3 
@Stabby - Then I'm a hunter-gatherer. Jeez, have you learned nothing from KGH??? It's not about re-enactment, it's about getting as much tail as possible. You need to stop reading the biochem and hang out with Kamal and me at the bar. Then you'll understand. – Aravind Aug 9 2011 at 2:42
4 
Not about re-enactment? THEN WHY DID I TRADE MY CLOTHES FOR A SPEAR?! This is a big letdown. – Stabby Aug 9 2011 at 3:00
show 10 more comments
20

Excessive sitting on the ass.

link|flag
3 
Or maybe Gary Taubes. – thhq Aug 9 2011 at 2:19
show 1 more comment
16

I'm going with cocaine. I think that we are surrounded by it, in a figurative sense.

Sounds dumb, but bear with me. Get ready for a way-too-long answer. Moreso than food reward, I'm looking at our attitude on reward in general. Food reward is an unconventional but excellent answer as to what it is about our diets that is most negatively affecting our health. Aravind and I were talking at AHS about dose-dependent toxins, and wondered if the big 3 (gluten, n-6, sugar) are mostly a big deal because people eat so much now. If packaged foods have more of these three, and people eat way more packaged food and food in general, then oila!

But why do people eat so much packaged food? Lots of reasons, obviously. Convenience, price, palatability, blah blah. But one factor lurking in the background is that there just isn't time for the average Joe to think about food or prepare it themselves. Time is spent doin things that we know temporarily will make us happy-- checking Gmail 10-100 times a day, checking paleohacks 10-100 times a day, facebook, twitter, TV-on-DVD, etc etc.

What if everything had a "Nutrition Label" that showed how it affected your brain? So your smartphone could have a label that says "1 daily dose = 10 mg cocaine". Now I know virtually nothing about neurotransmitters, but I'd bet that the daily dopamine/seratonin/norepinephrine rush from internet/tv/smartphone is mother@#$% huge!

Whenever someone gets on a soapbox and talks about how smartphones might be bad, or checking email a billion times a day might be bad, it can sound smart, but nobody cares. We should care! The NIH funds primarly drug and medical device trials because that's where the research agenda is at. Despite this, we paleos have managed to snoop around and find a good approximation of a healthy diet. The NIH is just never going to be that interested in making us live a more mindful life, and stop deepening these grooves in our brain dedicated to instant reward.

I know that if I see something new and interesting on paleohacks, I'll google the shit out of it in an instant. Screw that, if I see something new and interesting in an episode of Golden Girls, I'll google the shit out of that too. The only reason I don't feel like a helpless drug (technology) addict on a daily basis is that everybody I know is doing it. Currently, 30% of my friends check their smartphones in the middle of conversations. I can only imagine what the percentage will be in 10 years. Personally, I hope to reverse direction a bit and wean myself of technology. That will afford much more time for cooking, chillin', pleasure reading, and doing things that I don't feel I have to interrupt to get an email buzz.

In summary, I'm apprehensive that I am no match for technology. There are so many interesting paleo blogs, and that is just one subject matter. When I see someone like Kurt Harris withdraw for a while, it makes smile a little. But another part of me feels like a vampire who craves more KGH posts. Although the connection is roundabout, I do feel like taming this instant-satisfaction monster must be tied to not craving rewarding foods, as well as creating time to build up activities that don't involve information fixes. In fact, I want to get a before-and-after fMRI to track just how hard this hamster is sucking at the sugar (information) straw, and how much I can improve.

link|flag
2 
mmmmmmmmmmmm. dopamine. – g. Aug 9 2011 at 5:06
1 
+1 - You hit the jackpot, Kamal. You've written a bit of a different version of what I would have written had I had the time and energy this evening. The answer to the question is very difficult because yes, it is FOOD REWARD. But the underpinnings of that are huge and cannot, in IMO be divorced from STRESS in all its many, many and varied "disguises" in our culture. The problem is that people cannot hear this. Stress? That's a trite bunch of crap. Well, it's huge. You've talked about a whole area of it and there are others. What "binds" all of this is the word: hyperstimulating. (continued) – Atkins-witha-loincloth Aug 9 2011 at 5:29
7 
I believe that food reward theorists would do well to move away from terms like "highly palatable" which does NOT translate well, to what I believe it actually IS and people might be able to begin to hear: hyperstimulating. The stress that is the issue in the culture of modern life, which is only worseing, is HYPERSTIMULATION - yes, COCAINE in a multitude of forms. The follwoing has many excellent scientific talks re: addiction as it relates to this subject and food, specifically. Industrial food in particular, is yeat another hyperstimulation.foodaddictionsummit.org/agenda.htm – Atkins-witha-loincloth Aug 9 2011 at 5:33
3 
I fully agree. We are so overstimulated that plain food bores us. 3D movies make gazing at a flat forest dull, and feeling our lungs inflate with fresh air is non-existent. Camping? Kids want water slides and rides that didn't even exist when I was a tot. Yet, on the other hand, if I unplug my computer, will I get bored and...and...Eat? Our worse, go out and kill from frustration' Maybe; it is in our genes. Kill the beast..today's beast is a failed society. And we now go on vacation with fb instead of talking to strangers at the pool. – Kathi Aug 9 2011 at 10:22
2 
very insightful. Food reward or susceptibility to it just a subset of a larger problem that links the general culture with our neurochemistry. It is not "stress" that is a problem, it is our culturally sanctioned learned responses to it. Do fish know what water is? – Kurt G Harris MD Aug 9 2011 at 16:17
show 10 more comments
14

Food reward is the fourth horseman.

link|flag
1 
KGH - Does that mean you buy into Food Reward theory now? – Aravind Aug 9 2011 at 1:32
2 
What are you talking about Loon? You can't eat a concept. Or this is a really meta answer and I'm being obtuse. – Kamal Aug 9 2011 at 1:41
1 
But what causes the dysregulation of food reward? Occam's razor, our savior. – Stabby Aug 9 2011 at 2:28
6 
Food reward as SG defines it ("the psychology term") is conceptually nonsense from the get-go and, unlike your first three horsemen, "palatability" is not practically sellable to most anyone as something that can generally be (or should be) voluntarily eliminated or avoided. Might be of interest in treatment of existing obesity. Might be interesting for exploring the poorly-understood neurophysiological mechanisms related to appetite and eating behaviors. But definitely not a horseman candidate imo. – whakahekeheke Aug 9 2011 at 3:01
5 
IF we are talking about causes - plural - of diseases of civilization I think the entire cultural milieu of food - how it is mixed, cooked, prepared, combined and processed and even literally the mental space it occupies is likely to be an independent contributor to DOC via excess caloric intake and to obesity via setpoint dysregulation. The concept makes quite a lot of sense to me and is not at all incompatible with DOC also being caused by the unique properties of wheat, excess (not just a few pieces of fruit) fructose and excess linoleic acid. There may be other significant NADs as well. – Kurt G Harris MD Aug 9 2011 at 16:09
show 14 more comments
12

I'm thinking nutrient deficiencies for your fourth. They can be huge determiners of health. Deficiencies of copper, selenium, vitamin c, zinc, choline, etc. can raise the risk of chronic disease significantly, and most SAD people aren't getting enough of them.

link|flag
1 
Ding ding. I asked Kurt Harris once to make that number 4, And mentioned it yesterday. I tend to think that most of the lifestyle facts actually stem from mal-micronutrition. The introduction of white bread in Europe caused the insane asylums to fill up like nothing else, and fortification of bread mitigated it. Of course we don't want fortified bread we want paleo food. – Stabby Aug 9 2011 at 1:22
3 
But I think we should count sunlight and breathing in airborne microbes/possibly eating dirt as nutrition, because they are things we need to get into the body, so that kind of shares the lifestyle territory. Big piece of the puzzle there in the gut flora and stuff we synthesize due to contact with sunlight. – Stabby Aug 9 2011 at 1:29
1 
White bread caused Europe to go insane? This is a perfect time to provide a link, Stabs. – Kamal Aug 9 2011 at 1:29
1 
The Big Stabowski-- I was looking for more of a historical, European anthro type link, if you've got one handy. Or I guuuuessss I could google. – Kamal Aug 9 2011 at 1:54
4 
Who's plugging anything except for eating a nutritionally complete diet? There isn't even mention of supplements, that stuff comes from food. – Stabby Aug 9 2011 at 3:04
show 8 more comments
10

Big Brother.

You can't eat it, but it ruins everything. Heck, it fluoridates our water (which has been proven to increase complacency), takes away our money (thus, less to spend on grass-fed beef and organic greens), messes with our careers (leading to stress and cortisol spikes), tries to zap our intelligence with TV and useless celebrity babble to distract us from reality (goodbye new neural synapses that could have been formed), uses the FDA 'stamp of approval' to allow toxic chemicals in out food supply (mm .. preservatives and aspartame and all things toxic and lovely), oh how I could go on and on and on ...

The main horseman of the apocolypse: Big Brother.

A cavewoman wouldn't put up with this. I am a cavewoman. I won't.

P.S. Gotta love me some thought police ...

link|flag
1 
Are they not just behind it all? – Celton Aug 31 2011 at 2:12
9

Lack of sleep for sure...

link|flag
8

My money's on trans fats - or preservatives, which actually - surprisingly - aren't discussed all that much on PaleoHacks.

link|flag
show 4 more comments
8

I'll propose insufficient sunlight, leading to massive Vitamin D deficiencies. Or, put another way, too much time spent indoors.

link|flag
7

Economics. The drive to make everything cheaper destroys food quality. It's what led to vegetable oils, factory farming, food additives, and grain based commodity agriculture. Stress is huge too.

link|flag
show 3 more comments
6

Reduced proprioceptive feedback and increased nociception.

link|flag
3 
Now can you add an informative link to those of us rubes who have no idea what those are? (Thanks! :-D) – familygrokumentarian Aug 9 2011 at 1:18
1 
Well, basically when parts of the body align, move, and work properly they send afferent (to the brain) signals more dominated by proprioception. When they are misaligned, dysfunctional, or even injured you get more nociceptive feedback. One tends to inhibit the other. Nociception is not always a pain response, but does through various feedback loops stimulate the human "stress" or sympathetic response increasing allostatic load. A lot of studies that show movement to improves physiologic or cognitive markers points to this. – JayJay Aug 9 2011 at 1:30
3 
well, I upvoted just because it sounds cool – The Loon Aug 9 2011 at 1:39
show 1 more comment
6

Ok, I'm going with a preservative/pesticide combo and calling it: Food Additives

Stress is big tho.

link|flag
5

I'll go with the sunshine/outdoors. Does that make it a two-headed horse or a fifth horse? And I wouldn't go with gluten on the other horse, but switch it with wheat.

link|flag
4

Soy is terrible!

link|flag
3

I voted for three. Could we simply have two sets of four? I'll leave the rest of you to haggle that out.

I'm too tired from lack of sleep, Vit D deficiency, and too many damn calories. Although it is seeming that any calories are too damn many.

grouse complain bitch kvetch whine carp grumble bellyache

link|flag
show 1 more comment
3

Human kind is responsible for a helluva lot more than four horsemen. We've created a Budweiser Clydesdale team of health challenges to contend with.

link|flag
3

There could be nine horsemen, if the metaphor were switched to the Ringwraiths (Nasgul) from The Lord of the Rings. http://www.games-workshop.com/MEDIA_CustomProductCatalog/m680117a_P1Mb1.jpg

Under that rubric I'd add (in no particular order) cortisol, overpopulation, technology, soy/legumes, veganism. and greenhouse gases.

If I had to pick one and stick within Kamal's type of categories . . . cortisol.

link|flag
show 1 more comment
3

Jack Kruse .

link|flag
2

Trans-fats.

Health: Healthy cells require healthy cell membranes in order to efficiently absorb nutrients and eliminate metabolic waste.

Happiness: A toxic cellular environment puts someone at risk for cancer and other degenerative diseases that will make you sad :(

Longevity: When you're cells can't eat and breathe, they weaken and die. Tissues die, then an organ, body system and you.

link|flag
2

processed food

it's a catch all for the worst stuff not fitting under the first three

link|flag
2

Elevated Cortisol!?

link|flag
2

Mercury in our teeth! I had my amalgams removed one years ago and just finished my third five day round of chelation with oral ALA and oral dmsa and I'm very pleased with the progress. Energy up, mood better, better results in gym and bedroom, less calories consumed (better food absortion I feel.). Only negative, short term memory loss while "on round". Memory gets solid again when "off round". This is where I have to differ with the Quilt and Harris . (They seem to poo-poo the toxicity of Mercury in amalgams) There is something going on. Granted the Ala can be doing this with its antoxidant effect ,rather than with it chelation effect, but I feel pretty bad the first day "off round" ,as well as if I don't dose "on round" close enough to the ALA half life. Feeling lousy would be due to a redistribution of the Mercury. Coming off any other antioxident never has this effect for me. And even more telling, why the memory loss. No other antioxidant gives me short term memory loss. Stirring up Mercury and redistibuting it would be such a cause though.

link|flag
show 1 more comment
1

Lead...........

link|flag
1 
...can't handle ... all the ellipses .... – Allie Aug 9 2011 at 13:44
1

ALEs...........

link|flag
6 
i'd go with lagers – ben61820 Aug 9 2011 at 13:52
1

  • Lack of exercise
  • Lack of Sleep
  • Lack of sunshine
  • Too much stress

??

Wait that's four. Okay trans fats? And then those 4 up there can be... another set of four horsemen I guess. Meh. I can't say I know exactly what I'm talking about.

link|flag
1

I would say "Trans Fats or Hydrogenated Fat" and in fact, that should be the first one

link|flag
1

GMOs in food and in the feed of the animals most people eat.

And sure all the other toxins from the air, the water and the chemicals we put on our skin.

link|flag
1

I'm going with car culture. Car culture contributes mightily to many of the problems that vex us, particularly in a built environment that practically ensures we all participate in that culture. Problems include:

  • crashes as a leading cause of death, and the top cause of child death
  • no sidewalks in many communities
  • diminished access to healthy food, limited to big-box supermarkets that dominate food production with a focus on cheap, mass-marketed processed food
  • increased reliance on the convenience of drivethru restaurants, almost none of which offer food worth eating
  • ability to obtain food from farther and farther away, leading to reduced access to locally grown food
  • children who never walk to school, and thus grow up not recognizing their own bodies as efficient, healthy transportation machines
  • reduced exposure to the outdoors and the sun (driving from garage to garage, barely setting foot outside to go from our homes to the office, to the store, back home, etc.
  • reduced opportunities to benefit from the exertion of lifting and carrying things over distances
  • diminished sense of community, and healthy social contact with others
  • increased stress and anxiety caused by traffic
  • near constant exposure to pollutants, and toxins released from the car itself from its exposure to heat and UV ("indoor air quality" worse in cars than most anywhere else)
  • ...and many more

I don't have a car, but even I have significant dependance on them. One can hardly help it these days, and car culture works very well at encouraging our complicity in the food environment which we struggle against.

link|flag
1 2 next

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.