PETA is claiming that this picture (below) featured in the NY Times Food & Wine section was "too sexy" and is tantamount to pornography.
Do you find this image offensive? If so, why? Or, are you consumed with thoughts of rubbing garlic and oil all over this saucy bird?
Experiencing continual outrage over ridiculous shit may not be a Neolithic Agent of Disease, but I'm thinking it could definitely be classed as a Neolithic Symptom.
I'll skip the oil, but I'll happily massage with bacon grease. ;D
PETA of all orginisations is complaining about inappropriate sexual imagery? They're even more ludicrous than I thought, given their history of misogynistic or otherwise questionable images in many of their ridiculous ad campaigns. What a great example of how B12 deficiency can cause cognitive impairment.
Edit: No, I'm not offended by a photo of a chicken, even one in a suggestive pose ;)
Even though the chicken I eat is of much higher quality than the types that would be covered in salmonella, I can't help but be a bit apprehensive around raw chickens. As such, I get more of a "toxic waste" vibe from them than any sort of measurable tumescence.