Blog

0

Hi

I have heard these bars are ok for those who follow a fairly strict paleo diet

http://www.questproteinbar.com/

Just wondering what experience people have had with them.

Have you found them a good meal replacement?

Do they make you crave more sugar?

Is the dairy in the whey in anyway detrimental if you are following strict no grain/no dairy paelo?

Thank you!

flag
1 
are they the ones Jimmy moore peddles in his podcast for sponsorship? – FuelRestMotion Oct 13 2011 at 10:00

11 Answers

14

Any food that's processed, like these are, is generally not considered paleo.

Anything with dairy, like these have, is not really considered paleo.

Anything with added sweeteners, like these have, is definitely not considered paleo.

Anything with legumes (peanuts), as these have, is absolutely not paleo.

These are NOT a meal replacement.

These are not paleo.

link|flag
8

This is the difference between low carb Paleo and Aktins .... Low carb paleo is about WHOLE FOOD. This why it is superior to aktins and works better. It's not just a diet, it's a lifestyle.

link|flag
Great quote :) keep it up – Paleo Fighter 2011 Oct 14 2011 at 2:50
5

They are junk........

link|flag
3

Not by me......

link|flag
2

Our ancestors have been eating Quest Bars for hundreds of thousands of years.

No, wait, I'm thinking of quail eggs. Never mind.

link|flag
Which is worse, a protein bar or tired reenactment-inspired sarcasm? – tonysolo Oct 13 2011 at 17:54
But they were chocolate-covered quail eggs with the creamy nougat center. – Huey Oct 13 2011 at 19:14
@tonysolo, I think it depends on the execution of each. – maurile Oct 13 2011 at 20:06
1

Here is a better alternative:

Boil and mash some sweet potatoes.

Mix with some crushed Brazil nuts, unsweented cocoa powder, cinnamon, blueberries, and cranberries. Mix 1 tbsp of coconut oil or some coconut milk, and heat up in microwave.

Spray some Stevia powder or liquid Stevia. You basically have a sweet potato pie or a filling.

This is my dessert from now on, after giving up protein bars and pork rinds for good.

link|flag
curious about why you've given up pork rinds? I've just discovered them and have used them for a snack once a week or so. – Ruth Oct 13 2011 at 12:46
2 
I used to pig out on Frito Lay's Baken ETS, since it has zero carbs, no artificial ingredients. However, it's 800 cal per bag and I'm not sated until I finish two. That's 1600 calories. My metabolic advantage, since I'm on a 150g carb diet, stops at 3500 calories, as I consume about 2400, sans pork rinds. I gained 5 lbs, all in the abdomen. The problem here is food reward: too addictive, too tasty, too oinky and too fried. Decided I just don't need them. fritolay.com/our-snacks/… – Namby Pamby Oct 13 2011 at 14:04
I know it's not the point of this question, but I presume these are friend in an oil of some sort? Any clue what kind? I could use a calorie bump... – Tom R. Oct 13 2011 at 18:08
Presumably they're fried in bacon grease (SaFA), so no PUFA nor trans fats. However, the problem is that they're just too HYPERPALATABLE. I thought only carb-rich snacks were like that; wrong, you can have HYPERPALATABLE 100% fat snacks. I would wolf down 4 bags in a day and that was 3200 kcal. Plus the fact that it's fried, which isn't as good as something steamed, boiled, broiled, or raw, no matter what it's fried in. If anyone wants to test "metabolic advantage" it's easy to do w/pork rinds. U'll realize that calories do matter, esp. if you go over 4,000 calories. – Namby Pamby Oct 13 2011 at 20:07
I actually emailed them and asked in what they're fried. the response was that they're fried "in their own juices" -- pork fat. i seem to have the opposite response -- i feel stuffed after just a few. hmmm – Ruth Oct 14 2011 at 12:24
show 4 more comments
1

The sucralose is the biggest offender IMO. They claim it's the safest sweetener but an animal study by Duke showed otherwise and from an anecdotal standpoint, splenda makes me feel sick in ways that stevia & even erythritol never do.

"a Duke University study conducted on rats (funded by The Sugar Association[21]) shows that at sucralose consumption levels of 1.1 mg/kg (below the FDA 'safe' level) to 11 mg/kg, throughout a 12-week administration of Splenda exerted numerous adverse effects, including reduction in beneficial fecal microflora, increased fecal pH, and enhanced expression levels of P-gp, CYP3A4, and CYP2D1, which are known to limit the bioavailability of nutrients and orally administered drugs.[22]" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splenda

link|flag
But who funded that study? The Sugar Assoc knows which side of the bread is buttered. They've been sponsoring studies like that on Stevia, Splenda, Aspartame, Sugar Alcohol, etc. The important thing here is to realize that individual responses to artifical sweeteners are highly variable. Most can tolerate them alright; but a few have severe reactions. The noisy minority always shuts out the silent majority. I have no problems with any of them. So do everyone that I know. But the ones I hear from are those with allergic reactions. – Mambo Sep 13 at 5:25
0

I don't eat them because of the sucralose. Someone on here said that there's a new sucralose-free version, but I haven't been able to find it. Even if sucralose-free, I'd question what they use to sweeten them now.

I think it's best to train your taste buds to not want that sweetness at all.

link|flag
0

Not paleo at all, but if you choose to eat them then you do. As I tell my son 'you better make sure the juice is worth the squeeze' ;)

Lots of people have given alternatives so I will share my 'energy bar' alternative: mix liquid coconut oil with shredded coconut and maybe some chopped dried cherries or other dried fruit or some chopped nuts, pour into a flat bottomed container, chill in fridge until solid, then cut into bite sized pieces, eat a few of these and in a few minutes great energy as your body burns the readily available good fat for energy.

link|flag
0

What about the Tanka Bar? http://www.tankabars.com/

I would love more variety in these, and a cheaper price. Maybe make some with Coconut, and dark chocolate bits (or nibs?) I am sure there are some other good ideas to make these a bit more, but less expensive than the buffalo.

link|flag
That's supposed to be pemmican. According to Loren Cordain, they cause atherosclerosis. – Namby Pamby Oct 13 2011 at 20:10
0

Of course not, but don't worry, you're not missing much.

link|flag

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.