Blog

5

1 
Craving sweet tastes and rapid growth makes perfect sense to me. Breast milk is super sweet. I wonder what the would have filled in between full weaning and late adolescence in non-tropical climates? – Happy Now Nov 5 2011 at 5:20
@Happy, in non=tropical cultures you have honey, milk (which tastes sweet to an un-spoiled pallet,) maple syrup, berries, and even winter squash. – Aughra Nov 5 2011 at 23:54

5 Answers

1

Every animal I've ever had has tried to steal sweet things from empty plates/cups, even the obligate-carnivore-kitties. So I'm not surprised that behaviors common to other species may be biological.

link|flag
My cats always LOVED sweet corn (and earwax), but not sweets as such. And one of my cats had two litters of kittens - they liked just about anything! – Efaitch Nov 5 2011 at 8:29
1

Great Read! It makes sense. My first pop was at age 10. My parents were strict on the sugar. I can thank them now... At the time it seemed like a major bummer..

link|flag
1

Makes sense to me. The brain is developing and is more sensitive to all stimuli since it hasn't pruned all the excess neurons yet. This is why developing good habits at an early age is crucial to the ability to form and keep good habits later in life. I would also guess it has something to do with kids being more sensitive to leptin and insulin (compared to adults and assuming they aren't already IR and LR) and can therefore handle larger amounts before the body sends the signal to the brain that they've had enough. The most likely explanation though is that as they mature and their bones stop growing, leptin levels increase since leptin inhibits bone growth. This also means younger kids need lower leptin levels to let bones grow, and since appetite and bone growth are linked by the leptin-serotonin pathway, they'll have a bigger appetite. As this study shows, http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090903163552.htm leptin suppresses appetite by blocking synthesis of serotonin in the brain. This makes sense evolutionarily since increasing bone growth and appetite at the same time means you're getting more raw materials and fuel needed for bone growth and will allow kids with those genes to grow faster and thus have an advantage. The problem is excess sugar is destabilizing to the brain and I don't think it's a coincidence that there's both a higher percentage of kids with adhd and more high sugar foods in the diets of most kids these days . . . http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16750194.

link|flag
"excess sugar is destabilizing to the brain" source? – cliff Nov 5 2011 at 11:30
adhd is made up, kids are supposed to be hyper active. – cliff Nov 5 2011 at 11:35
Chris the real issue is with this info what happens when a human diet is incongruently filled with sweet say for their life span? This is the current problem. Generally the diet of paleo man was not loaded with sweets/sugar so for two million years it was a non issue. And your point about the brain is spot on and the evidence was laid out by the biochemistry discuused by tafur, Lalonde and me. Plus one! – The Quilt Nov 5 2011 at 13:36
Your answer shows that you are beginning to see the method of quilt.... – The Quilt Nov 5 2011 at 13:37
1

I was an adult massive sugar junkie, like loilo says, but being off sugar has massively changed that. Yesterday I bought a coconut (the need for hot cooking oil means I'll never be totally free of botanicals, I guess - so I broke down and bought a botanical). I drank the juice, described in the cookbooks as having just a hint of sweetness. But to me, it was knock-yer-socks-off sweet.

I would have spat out anything sweeter. Seriously.

link|flag
0

alt text

link|flag
lol nice. "We know it sounds odd" . . . cause it is odd – Chris Antenucci Dec 3 2011 at 4:00

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.