Blog

21

5

Vitamin C is an important antioxidant that humans, along with the rest of the great apes, and some other less relevant animals like guinea pigs, bats etc., have lost the ability to synthesize. We lost this ability at a time when we were largely frugivorous and were thus ingesting plenty of it.

Along the way, we've lost uricase, which is an enzyme that breaks down uric acid, another antioxidant. It's tempting to therefore dismiss the importance of vitamin C and rely on the RDA or whatever amount doesn't produce obvious symptoms of scurvy. Well avast, ye swabs, we should be ingesting a lot more of it.

The Hadza are a group of hunter-gatherers who reside in Tanzania. Hominins have been evolving there since we broke off from our shared ancestor with chimps and bonobos about 7 million years ago. Groups of hunter-gatherers in this region have been exploiting largely the same species of plants and animals for millions of years. As such, it is my contention that the Hadza are the single most important hunter-gatherer group for the study of optimal human nutrition. I believe that all hominin populations outside of the tropics are on marginal lands and though there have been adaptations to these conditions, the vast majority of our genetic code has been selected with the conditions under which the Hadza live "in mind." Just as 2 million > 10,000, 7 million > 60,000. I can think of no population less relevant to the study of worldwide optimal human health than the Inuit, whereas the Hadza have a far greater chance of being broadly applicable.

The Hadza diet is comprised primarily of baobab, tubers, flesh and seasonal berries, with as much honey as they can find. Baobab is the single largest contributor of kcals in their diet and is a surprisingly rich source of vitamin C. There is a variable amount of vitamin C content in the fruit that depends on the tree, but I have seen the range listed as 1500 to 5000 mg/kg. Given that they eat so much of it, daily gram dosages are not out of the realm of possibility. The baobab pods are available almost year-round since the trees produce pods at different times. The Hadza move their camps fairly regularly, but almost always have a source of this important food.

Though a person of northern European descent may be better at coping with reduced intake of vitamin C compared to a Hadza, I think it's safe to say that there is a significant evolutionary precedent for quite high vitamin C intakes and that those who pursue gram dosages every day are not the wackjobs they're made out to be here and elsewhere. Vitamin C is one of the least toxic (and cheap) supplements you can buy. I've never seen any evidence that supplementing with gram doses is harmful, only insistence that it's not necessary. Because many here avoid fruit for God knows what reason, simply taking a supplement should suffice, though I suspect that there are various other compounds not yet fully understood that are in foods like baobab that are also beneficial and that we have evolved alongside.

I therefore recommend that pure ascorbic acid be purchased and dosed 1/8th tsp (500mg) at a time (mixed with plenty of water) several times a day. Those wishing to not amplify their iron absorption (and/or diminish their copper and zinc absorption) would do well not to take it with meat, organs, shellfish etc. Similarly, because the structure of vitamin C is so similar to glucose, they share absorptive mechanisms. As such, it would be best not to take it with starch, since the glucose would be in far greater amounts and drown it out, as it were. Thus, it seems to me that taking it on an empty stomach 15-20 minutes before meals may be optimal, and that bowel disturbances should not occur at this dosage, provided that it is sufficiently diluted.

Edit: Dragonfly brings up the important consideration that ascorbic acid, as you might imagine, is highly acidic and would be best not to have it contact your teeth. I always swish water after taking vitamin C (or eating any fruit or starch for that matter) but forgot to mention that.

flag
2 
Most HG meals are on their own simply because that's how the food is available. We don't have such limitations, so a Scot with hemochromatosis isn't going to want to take it with his steak, for example. – Travis Culp Nov 12 2011 at 3:22
2 
You should see if you can contract a case of OCD...makes this stuff way easier. Wait...did I lock the door? – Travis Culp Nov 12 2011 at 3:32
2 
Not a big fan of Kamal, eh? Keep it quiet though, one of his informants is lurking in this thread. – Travis Culp Nov 12 2011 at 3:37
5 
Wait, what? It's not a zinc deficiency? ZincMan, have you lost your purpose? – Scrubjay Nov 12 2011 at 5:25
4 
This is a good question...for me to poop on! – Kamal Nov 12 2011 at 6:23
show 17 more comments

8 Answers

8

I didn't realize it had been categorically dismissed

to name just a few relevant opinions in the blogosphere that advocate Vitamin C and its importance

link|flag
yeah, I'm totally oblivious to this one. Is this some debate the carnivores were in? Even in the midst of winter in Sweden, you can find sorbus berries and lingonberries frozen on trees and on the ground. They were nice snacks when I was doing forestry there :) – Bread-Eating Beelzebub Nov 12 2011 at 3:30
They both recommend too little, in my opinion, though a gram a day would be leagues ahead of what most people take. – Travis Culp Nov 12 2011 at 3:31
1 
Jaminet actually recommends C megadoses fully, with bowel tolerance included - perfecthealthdiet.com/?p=636 – nope Nov 12 2011 at 7:59
I think most people would agree that a reasonable amount of vitamin C per day is great! The super-ultra-mega-dosing however, has the potential to interact with iron and create free-radicals (negating the idea of taking an antioxidant in the first places). At best, taking way over the limits our body can process at one time, decreases absorption of Vitamin C from food and creates pricey urine. Pauling did a lot of fabulous work, but probably won't be remembered for thinking that Vitamin C cures cancer. For now, get a reasonable amount! It's an important vitamin. – JeJ Jan 16 2012 at 20:37
7

Yes, it is misguided.

I was totally with you until you proposed taking only a supplement--you knew I'd say this, didn't you Travis?

One or 2 pieces of fruit plus a moderate C supplement ensures some intake of any other beneficial elements we don't even know about yet. Just as tubers are obviously great food, moderate fruit is good too.

However, I agree totally if a person is determined to avoid fruit--but I think that's a questionable choice.

link|flag
4 
You can lead them to fruit, but you can't make them eat it. This would be better than nothing at all. Personally, I eat lots of fruit and tubers (just as the Hadza do, though not because they do) and feel great. – Travis Culp Nov 12 2011 at 3:08
On top of that, I take vitamin C as described because I don't live in the tropics (yet). – Travis Culp Nov 12 2011 at 3:09
2 
Can't do the fruit (fructose intolerance) but I'm not crazy about liquid ascorbic acid on my teeth either. I'll stick to capsules. – Dragonfly Nov 12 2011 at 3:16
1 
Seems like simply swishing water afterward as I do would be sufficient. I'll add that to the post. – Travis Culp Nov 12 2011 at 3:18
@Dragonfly what about ascerola powder? – Aughra Nov 12 2011 at 3:22
show 4 more comments
4

I have seen the argument that the human body clears vitamin C very, very rapidly (almost like a toxin) and that we have evolved to use uric acid in replace of vitamin C, so the quantities seen in other animals may not be relevant to humans.

I think Peter at Hyperlipid said that he used to mega-dose on vitamin C, then decided vitamin C supplementation was a bad thing. I think one of his arguments involves interfering with adaptation to exercise.

(I usually take 2-3 grams a day myself, but I would be curious to see what others thought of these arguments.)

link|flag
2 
Well, I answered this, but Melissa deleted all of it so if you didn't read the answer which explains it all, you know how to find me -- majkinetor – majkinetor Nov 12 2011 at 17:01
2

Travis, for the vitamin C supplementation noobs out there (not me obviously... other people), can you explain what the benefits of supplementing vit c are, and also the dangers of not getting enough.

link|flag
2 
I think the most noticeable thing that most of the people here would benefit from is collagen synthesis as it pertains to connective tissue. So many people in the community lift weights/do crossfit so tendonitis issues could arise as they did for me before I started taking it. Healing in general seems to be a lot better. – Travis Culp Nov 12 2011 at 5:07
Wow, that's interesting. Might have to look into it, Cheers – peter Nov 12 2011 at 5:16
1 
Additionally, a lot of people are concerned with ROS and longevity and ascorbic acid is intimately tied to GSH, which is our most important endogenous antioxidant. Those interested in optimal mitochondrial function, and thus longevity, and an overall reduction in oxidative stress would do well to ensure that all antioxidants are humming along in optimal amounts. – Travis Culp Nov 12 2011 at 5:18
1

"Groups of hunter-gatherers in this region have been exploiting largely the same species of plants and animals for millions of years."

How do we know this? How do we know that human have continuously lived there all this time? They could have moved out for thousands of years, then moved back, etc.

According to the book 1491, the current Amazonian forest is not a pristine forest, but a leftover, overgrown orchard that had been carefully tended and shaped by pre-Columbian Indians for thousands of years. So what do we know about the history of the Tanzanian ecology?

link|flag
1 
Would you say that archaeology is A) more scientific B) less scientific or C) as scientific as phrenology? – Travis Culp Nov 12 2011 at 3:59
Hey, don't knock archaeology. It's getting more advanced every year. The work with plant phytoliths and microfossils is helping to tell us more about what plants people have eaten in the past. – Bread-Eating Beelzebub Nov 12 2011 at 4:19
Yeah but I dug a hole in the ground and didn't find baobab (or even microbaobab) pods. – Travis Culp Nov 12 2011 at 4:23
1

What do you think about the link between such larger doses of supplementatal C (as you recommend) and kidney stones (excess urinary oxalic acid)? My fiance is afraid to supp C anymore since that time he tried taking 1000mg of C daily, and passed two kidney stones within a year. I suppose this depends mostly on the individual but kidney stones are so awful I wouldn't recommend the 'try it and see' approach...

link|flag
1 
That is a myth. There is no such thing. The myth is based on theoretical background that final product of C metabolism is oxalate which forms stone with calcium in acidic environment. Those prone to it will take Sodium Ascorbate to alkalize urine. See Linus Pauling's explanation: vitamincfoundation.org/forum/… – nope Nov 12 2011 at 6:27
0

How much do you need to take to get consistent loose bowels?

link|flag
0

thirty percent of americans eating SAD have gingivitis. Gingivitis can be cured with vit C. paleo eaters may have a little better track record with regards to gingivitis. gingivitis is a bio marker for atherosclerosis. i take vit c to prevent atherosclerosis a low grade scurvey condition. i renamed it Vit c because vitamin is short for vital amine and Vit C is not an amine.

link|flag

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.