Blog

5

1

I am not talking about allergies, but about milder food intolerance. How do people approach this to quantify and measure it? I have read that most serum lab blood tests are useless. Prick tests? Elimination and reintroduction seems to be the consensus, but still there is nothing quantifiable. Do people use blood glucose measurements to determine their food intolerance? Some people use heart rate or heart rate variability(HRV) changes while eating particular foods. Please share your strategies!

flag
I don't need an external measure. What's the point? How I feel after eating a food--either immediately or within a few hours-- is enough information for me. Then again, I am highly sensitive after going Primal, so I notice pretty quickly if a food isn't working for me. – Dragonfly Nov 13 2011 at 2:44
Are we to infer that you have concluded that you may have "milder food intolerances"? How "mild"? – Dorado Galore Nov 26 2011 at 23:49

9 Answers

5

An allergy is to a protein, a sensitivity or intolerance is referring to a non-protein food issue. My strongly preferred method to determine these in a body is elimination and reintroduction of potentially offending foods. I've seen wrong information with so many of the tests available, and observation of one's own body's reaction can't be beat, imo. I recommend a full three weeds of strict avoidance of the foods in question, then allowing a full 72 hours per food during reintroduction time with notes taken on any symptoms that may emerge.

link|flag
To an extent, I take issue with the eliminate-reintroduce method. It works for me with things like gluten or alcohol. The other day though, I decided to have ice cream for the first time in 6 months. I usually don't even do well with dairy anyway. After though, I felt completely fine, no mucus, nothing. And several days out I had no symptoms. This means I don't have an allergy to ice cream but in terms of whether a specific food is good or bad for me, I don't see this method as all to accurate, more limitedly accurate. – mloster Nov 12 2011 at 19:03
Hmmm, I'm not saying you're wrong but when I tried to reintroduce ice cream I couldn't even finish the dish because it upset my stomach immediately. It was cheap ice cream that must have contained some milk. At Christmas I'm going to search for premium ice cream that has only heavy cream (or make my own) and I hope that will be okay since sugar doesn't really bother me. – Nance Nov 12 2011 at 19:31
And yes, it's not so easy that you can just eat everything that doesn't make you sick--but it will help you identify foods that DO make you sick. – Nance Nov 12 2011 at 19:32
2 
What I mean by a full 72 hour reintroduction is that you would consume copious amounts of that food over the period, not just eat it once. In your case, you now know that you can eat ice cream with no discernable ill effects once in a great while, but you didn't get information enough to know if you can eat dairy in good health on a regular basis. – Rogue Nutritionist Nov 12 2011 at 19:42
^That knowledge is really valuable, especially when a single binge on a food you actually are allergic to can mean a week of malaise/depression. – Kasra Nov 12 2011 at 19:56
show 5 more comments
2

My comments definitely relate only to mild reactions--no one suspecting a true allergy should follow my suggestion.

Prick tests were useless for me. I tested negative for allergy to wheat, yet I found out after going primal that wheat caused my stuffy nose and sneezing, GERD, and joint problems.

In answer to your question, I did use the eliminate-and-reintroduce method to check my reactions. Wheat was 90% of my trouble and I actually did fine with sugar but not milk.

I checked both my blood glucose and blood pressure frequently to verify what I was feeling. Wheat wasn't subtle, it made me feel really crummy. Milk did about the same. No major reaction to corn chips.

link|flag
So did you find any deviations in terms of blood glucose and blood pressure when it comes to the problematic foods? – tempomat Nov 12 2011 at 20:58
Wheat and milk made me sick enough that I didn't bother testing blood glucose, but my blood pressure went up about 20 points on top and 10 on bottom. When I tested glucose against fruit and sugar, the only thing that caused a true spike and that was pineapple I ate without eating meat or fat first. Otherwise, my BG is level and low. Blood pressure is nice and low only when I'm not eating wheat or sugar (and lower if I skip coffee which I'm not.) – Nance Nov 12 2011 at 21:10
2

Funny I'm going through a blood test, and an elimination diet right now... To see what my food sensitivies are... They are basing everything off of how I feel or bloat when I eat certain foods. I feel awesome after eliminating gluten and wheat from my diet... And its only been 5 days... I'm basing this off how I feel and what I think is right for me!

link|flag
2

Something I heard, maybe someone can back me up- Doesn't excess mucuous production (extra phlegm in the back of your throat) signal a sensitivity? I get that immediately after consuming sugars or low fat dairy.

link|flag
Yes, I heard that too and forgot to mention the hacking cough I had from both excess mucous and GERD. – Nance Nov 12 2011 at 19:29
This is very true for me. 20 years of constant post-nasal drip (phlegm in the back of my throat) cleared up perfectly within a month of no gluten/lactose. Whenever I eat gluten or excess lactose, then bam - throat phlegm. – Phoenix Nov 12 2011 at 19:37
1

IgG testing can reveal delayed reactions to food, such as food sensitivities, that otherwise won't be detected in traditional IgE allergy testing: http://gut.bmj.com/content/53/10/1459.short

link|flag
1

I had the prick test done it is was negative for everything. I have been gluten free for almost three years and while it helped the bloating I am still dealing with other issues. My chiropractor gave me a script to have an IGg blood test done. It said that anything over 2 was condidered high..my results was Wheat-9.9, egg yolk 9.7, dairy 6.7, soy 4.0. (I found it interesting that gluten was the only one that was completely negative as I had been gluten free for almost 8 months at that time) I never really did anything with the results as the Chiroprator made them seem insignificant stating that he has seen people with a results of 100. The only one I have kept with is the wheat/gluten. But I am thinking I need to stay away from the others as they did show a reaction. Any thoughts out there?

link|flag
0

I've found that blood tests and my own 'eliminate and reintroduce' efforts confirmed what several different homeopathic tests found. I've never had a prick test.

So I feel comfortable suggesting the blood tests along with homeopathic tests (even though they seem weird and kooky).

link|flag
0

I eliminated what (felt great) and then re-introduced it (felt awful). However, would this be classified as a wheat intolerance? Perhaps my body is just highly sensitive after the elminationg of wheat. I haven't had any major problems with wheat prior to trying this, but after elimination/re-introduction, I experienced extrement bloating, gas, etc.

link|flag
0

Prick testing is for immediate-onset allergies (IgE?). Think hives after shellfish, or anaphylactic shock after peanuts. They're not going to tell you anything about delayed onset allergies or sensitivities. (This from a mom who had her daughter tested with prick tests to try to diagnose her eczema and was told the kid was allergic to dust. Um, thanks, doc.)

link|flag

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.