Blog

18

3

My husband and I live a pretty strict Paleo lifestyle and bit by bit I'm trying to incorporate it into every last element of my life. Right now I'm stuck on birth control. I've been on birth control pills for over a decade and I'm pretty convinced that it's wreaking havoc with my body. Does anyone have any advice on non hormone based birth control methods (other than condoms)? How are other women dealing with this?

flag
This is a very good question. I've been thinking a lot about that myself lately. – Eva Aug 3 2010 at 3:06
Can I ask what type of birth control pills you have been taking? – Matt Aug 3 2010 at 12:47
Eva- I'm glad I'm not the only one thinking about it! Matthew- Loestrin 24Fe – Naphtali Aug 4 2010 at 18:24
are you planning on ever having children? when? – Bread-Eating Beelzebub Sep 25 2010 at 0:55
Melissa- yes and sometime over the next 2-3 years. – Naphtali Sep 27 2010 at 17:04
show 5 more comments

22 Answers

8

Fertility Awareness Method

I've used fertility awareness method (FAM) with my husband for 3.5 years and it's been effective thus far! You just have to get used to taking your temp every morning (or just during your fertile phase) and to checking your vaginal fluids. It's super easy we just avoid sex when I'm fertile (or we use a condom). And we have sex when I'm not fertile. Takes the guess-work out of it!!

Get this book: Taking Charge of Your Fertility

And visit this website: Taking Charge of Your Fertility

The information in the book will blow your mind. I was sooo mad that I hadn't been taught any of the information found therein while I was in biology class or sex ed in high school. We should all know this stuff!!

And yes... GET OFF THE PILL!!

link|flag
4 
I totally agree, and I would like to emphasize that FAM is NOT the same thing as the rhythm method, which we all know doesn't work very well. The rhythm method assumes every woman has a 28 day cycle, which is not always true. FAM charts basal body temperature and cervical fluid to tell you when your body's fertile, which is amazing and makes so much sense. If used correctly (100% adherence) it's as effective as condoms (~96%) or better. There's medical literature to back these statements up, if you want to check. Then just use condoms when you're fertile or need to protect against STDs. – Satapa Jun 30 2011 at 11:45
6

Does anyone have thoughts or experiences with Paraguard (copper, non-hormonal IUD)? I'm curious about them (I'm on the pill now, have been for about 5 years) but I've heard of people have significant bleeding, muscle pain and rejection issues.

link|flag
I second this question. Anyone have issues with the copper IUD? – Susan Aug 3 2010 at 0:25
they won't usually give it to women who have never been preggers. – Bread-Eating Beelzebub Aug 3 2010 at 3:05
1 
I have 2 kids and used the pill for years. After going paleo and losing 50lbs I started noticing the side effects of the pill. After talking with my DR. and my sister who has had a paraguard for 4 years I decided to try it. I was skeptical but I have had it in for 3 months and am HAPPY. After insertion, I had very little pain and NO bleeding. My first cycle was heavier and 2 days longer. My second cycle started 25 days later and was a bit heavy and 2 days longer. The only negative for me is I feel a bit of nausea prior to my cylce starting. Three months into it and I am happy with my decision. – Emadkins Aug 3 2010 at 7:11
2 
I don't have any kids and got the paraguard about a year ago. Never had a problem with cramping before insertion, which was painful but tolerable, but holy crap did I ever have cramps after insertion! Bleeding definitely heavy and periods that used to last 4-5 days lasted a full week (11 days the first time). Good news: cramps eventually subsided, and now a full year later I'm back to normal. Bleeding is still heavier but only for a day or two, but periods still lasting 6-7 days. BUT, I'm happy to be off of pills (took them for 14 years). Seriously, those things were making me crazy. – kat Aug 3 2010 at 13:35
1 
I am 24, never had kids, have the Paragard and love it! I have had basically the same experience as kat - initially, the cramps are terrible but it does get better! now, one year later, there are some months with bad cramping and others without. *Marisa - specifically ask your doctor for it... s/he should do it. – geelyn Aug 5 2010 at 1:40
show 6 more comments
5

The rhythm method, based on basal body temperature and cervical observations, is free (besides the cost of the thermometer) and has been practiced for ages. You need to be diligent about tracking and it can take a few months to learn how to identify when you're ovulating, especially if you have irregular cycles, but it works. Whatever you do, GET OFF THE PILL!

link|flag
5 
Q. What do you call people who use the rhythm method? A. Parents. Seriously, 2 of my 3 children were conceived when we were practicing rhythm. It's only worth doing if you are okay with it failing. – Ambimorph Aug 2 2010 at 22:53
3 
My existence is a testimony to the failure of the rhythm method ;) – sarah-ann Aug 2 2010 at 23:30
4 
in my country we called "the Vatican roulette" for a reason... – Yoannah_offca Aug 3 2010 at 0:18
1 
If you combine body temperature readings with LH detection (probably what Anon is talking about) and also, shall we say, "timely removal," then the percentages are just as good as condoms, maybe better. Don't forget, condoms rip. – Paul Aug 3 2010 at 2:56
1 
My experience with "fertility awareness" (aka the rhythm method) is that it is only as effective as your willpower. My hubby and I knew it was risky, but were drunk (and I was ovulating, which peaks desire!), and thus our firstborn was. For the second, it was intentional, but worked really, really well. – Mama J Aug 3 2010 at 6:09
show 3 more comments
5

Jumping Jacks after sex... it works great and it's extra exercise!!!

Disclaimer: This will probably not actually work.

link|flag
3

I went off the pill after about 10 years, and it was the best decision I could have made. I can't say exactly how I felt better, I just did. It also helped me control my weight, I think. I thought condoms would be a big fat pain to use, but really once you start, it's not that big of a deal. Except if you go away for a weekend and forget to take them!

link|flag
1 
But you can buy them pretty much anywhere. – ScottMGS Aug 3 2010 at 6:37
3

Really, your options break down into the following categories. They are roughly in the order of their effectiveness. The different techniques, methods, formulations, etc. within each category vary in effectiveness, too.

Contraception (not getting pregnant)
1) abstinence
2) physical barrier methods
3) hormonal manipulation
4) chemical barrier methods
5) timing

Birth control (becoming un-pregnant)
1) surgical
2) chemical
3) hormonal

Using these definitions, most women prefer "contraception" to "birth control". I understand your question to say that you'd like to avoid the hormonal and chemical methods and that abstinence is undesirable, too. That leaves physical barriers and timing.

If you have a latex allergy and can't use regular condoms you can find polyurethane condoms. (Female condoms are also polyurethane, I believe.) Many condoms come with a spermicide called nonoxynol-9 to which some people are sensitive but you can get them without. Barrier methods work better when used in conjunction with spermicidal/chemical barrier methds. (The study Melissa cites says the condom failure rate was ~2% where as perfect withdrawal - iffy at best! - runs at a 4% failure rate. I'd want to see how they controlled for that!)

I put both withdrawal and the rhythm method in the timing category though obviously the time scale is different. Both rely on probabilities like how much sperm is in the pre-ejaculate (> 0) and how long sperm can remain viable (longer than you think - the probability drops off rapidly but doesn't reach zero for quite a few days). The withdrawal method has the added disadvantage of relying on the man to retain self-control at a point when self-control is least available. (Think paleo for a minute: Our bodies are set up to increase the chance of pregnancy!)

Assisted timing (like Persona/Clear Blue - I don't know anything about these) would be ways to improve the odds but can not reduce the odds to zero.

link|flag
2

I hear the safest and easiest medical intervention is for the man to get snipped, not the woman. (sorry guys..) The males I have known had no side effects except for a short recovery period. -Eva

link|flag
That's probably the best option, but only if you are monogamous and don't want children later. – Ambimorph Aug 3 2010 at 3:19
That is absolutely true, Eva. It is a permanent solution (mostly), though. – ScottMGS Aug 3 2010 at 6:35
Yeah- but we do eventually want kids! – Naphtali Aug 4 2010 at 18:31
This is almost permanent- however, it was the month after my dad got snipped that we found out we were going to have a baby brother! – JeJ Feb 6 2012 at 2:01
2

Did you know withdrawal is just as effective as condoms? If I were married (IE getting pregnant would not be the end of the world) I would use this + Clear Blue (and ALWAYS withdraw, just don't have sex at all when Persona says not to).

There has never been a study finding sperm in the pre-ejaculate that I know of.

link|flag
I wouldn't want to take the risk with withdrawal. Too many things can go wrong. Maybe I'm just paranoid.... – Susan Aug 3 2010 at 3:33
Depends on how much you don't want a baby. It's too bad women have to wait so long, but I'm one of them waiting, so I can't really offer a solution. – Bread-Eating Beelzebub Aug 3 2010 at 4:00
What do you mean about women having to wait so long? – Susan Aug 3 2010 at 4:27
I've heard that some of the little swimmers can get out long before the main flood, so withdrawal is not 100 percent safe. – Eva Aug 3 2010 at 4:49
1 
Well anecdotes don't negate that study. I know people who used condoms who got pregnant and people who used withdrawl who didn't. – Bread-Eating Beelzebub Jan 21 2011 at 6:19
show 4 more comments
2

Birth control pills were a disaster for me - I got migraines along with other fun side effects. I had very few issues with progesterone only pills. You do have to take those exactly on time and consistently, or they don't work, since they don't always prevent ovulation, just implantation.

I used to use a cervical cap, which I loved, but they don't make them any more. All the current options bear no resemblance to the Prentif cervical cap. I mostly use sponges now, and they beat the heck out of condoms.

While spermicide isn't "natural", condoms are coated with the same chemical (nonoxnol-9)

link|flag
I ended up with jaundice/the beginnings of liver failure the last time I attempted to use the Pill so now it's strictly non-hormone birth control for me. I am not at all happy with the copper IUD but was hoping that cervical caps would be the next best choice? Do you mind expanding on why they aren't the same as they were/why you're not a fan any longer? Thanks! – invisible ink Jul 6 2011 at 1:11
Did they really stop making the Prentif cap? I loved that puppy, but haven't replaced it for years since I'm breeding these days. My favorite thing was that you could use homemade spermicide in it as the chemical stuff gave me UTIs. – Happy Now Jul 6 2011 at 1:33
1

My wife and I used Persona (Clear Blue in the US). It's 95% effective, according to the box. She pees on a stick each morning and presses some buttons at certain times in the month on the main device and it tells us when it's safe to get busy. You do have to get used to the idea that this will only be a fraction of the time - but you can just use condoms or other approaches the rest of the time. It's not the cheapest mothod around - those sticks are not that cheap. But it's hormone free.

link|flag
Be careful of the percentages on claims by the manufacturer. – ScottMGS Aug 3 2010 at 6:38
1

tubal ligation- some people are saying it worsens perimenopause/menopause, but i haven't seen evidence of it. i had it 13 years ago. still use condoms for protection from stds.

link|flag
1

How about "outercourse" (no vaginal penetration)? It takes a little self-control but it's very effective. It could be combined with fertility awareness methods or that persona/clear blue thing.

link|flag
Good point! There are many ways to have fun that effectively reduce the chance of pregnancy. – ScottMGS Aug 3 2010 at 6:58
I have a feeling that my husband might get a bit tired of that if it's all we do! ha ha ha!! – Naphtali Aug 4 2010 at 18:31
Haha well it's just another option. – Susan Aug 4 2010 at 19:38
1

I haven't tried this, but have girlfriends that swear by it. Have used it for years without any "accidents". Once I have a regular lover again I fully intend to use this method :)

http://raxmedical.com/pearly.php

link|flag
That's really interesting. I've never heard of devices like that. I'm definitely going to look into that, though it seems a bit too good to be true right now. – Susan Aug 4 2010 at 4:54
Interesting, thanks for the link. I've been on the pill for the past 7 years, and when I was last off it, my cycles varied anywhere from 6 weeks to 3-4 months, so I have no idea if something like this could work. Curious to see what my cycles are like off the pill though... – stephthegeek Aug 4 2010 at 21:35
I've used LadyComp (same company, same general design) and am a very satisfied customer (see my answer for details). – familygrokumentarian Apr 24 2011 at 3:03
1

I obviously can't comment from personal experience and don't have any more details of non-hormone alternatives that others have suggested.

The pill you are taking is a combined pill containing both an oestrogen and a progesterone hormone. As most of the side effects are due to the oestrogen you could try switching to a progesterone only pill. They are equally effective it taken correctly.

It is also possible to get a progesterone only implants that last 3 years or injections that last 3 months. They have the advantage that you can't forget to take them.

link|flag
They have the disadvantage that if you do have a problem, you're screwed because you can't go off them as desired. – Nicole Aug 5 2010 at 13:19
1

A vasectomy sounds like a good idea to me!

link|flag
1

Though I originally answered it here, I'm going to put this here, too, because the LadyComp was so useful and dependable for us:

I've never gone on the BCP - I had malignant melanoma as a teenager and when the time to find birth control came, I concluded that my body had already shown that it was predisposed to cancer, so through that filter of perhaps fuzzy logic (I had no BCP/melanoma correlation studies, just going on a hunch), I went searching for more natural options and found LadyComp, a cute little alarm clock with attached thermometer that takes basal body temp every morning and assesses your fertility with a very high degree of precision. (I'm not a LadyComp shill, just a satisfied user!) It worked terrifically for us, and when we finally DID decide to "go for it" during a time the LadyComp said I could be fertile, I conceived right away. The only catch? I haven't used it since becoming the mom of young kids because my kids' sleep schedules / nursing schedules plus lactational amenorrhea (no ovulation/period while nursing) made it impossible to have predictable sleep for a while, OR to enter a dates of having a period (which the LadyComp also uses in its logarithmic assessments of the user's fertility). SO, that said, I think it is a great best-of-natural-fertility-awareness-plus-modern-technology option for those who have fairly steady sleep schedules (or at least three hours of undisturbed sleep prior to waking in the morning) and are menstruating.
link|flag
1

Personally the pull out method always worked. Till my husband didn't pull out (a few times in one month) and I now have a bouncing 5 month old baby boy :) I don't ever think I've been a very fetile girl because this has worked for years and years but I know once being pregnant sometimes can make it easier to get pregnant again so I think I will be doing a combo of the FAM method and bringing a shot gun to bed- so he pulls out.

link|flag
1

I had a terrible reaction after going back on the pill for 1 week (after not taking it for about 6 years) - so I highly recommend FAM but in my much easier way which is to use LadyComp or BabyComp! Great for travel and has been an asset for myself and my husband.

link|flag
0

Withdrawal seems like the most natural.

It was definitely known in the ancient world.

It is mentioned explicitly in the Bible: Genesis 38:9

It is unclear whether the sin was the act of withdrawal itself, or more likely the motivation behind it.

Early Jewish sources are varied, but according to mystical cabalistic schools it is a very big no-no. Later Jewish code books go on and on about how bad it is, so Rabbis direct women to oral contraceptives! A big shame, IMHO.

I don't think that it would have been so widespread, and so sternly opposed if it wasn't very effective.

link|flag
7 
Many people are alive today thanks to the withdrawal method :) – Matt Sep 24 2010 at 21:03
1 
Matthew, many people are alive today thanks to failing condoms. No method is 100% effective. Withdrawal, when used correctly (which is rare), is just slightly less effective than condoms. People also get pregnant on the pill. – SarahH May 15 2012 at 1:48
0

IUD is not counterindicated for nulliparous (women with no history of pregnancies) - this is an idea that doctors still spread because: 1- they don't know otherwise 2- they are not used to implant IUDs and are afraid to do it on someone who has never had kids 3- there is indeed 1 in 1,000 chances to have a rejection, incident after insertion which can eventually lead to infertility (so the stakes are higher on nulliparous)

I have been off the pill for about a year now and uses condoms in the meantime, but i am planning on getting an IUD soon (not planning on having kids for the next 4 years so I think it's worth it)

The chances of something wrong happening are slim, especially because I did some research and found a place where they insert IUDs very regularly and have very good feedbacks on forums.

link|flag
0

Another rhythm method practitioner here. Actually, we used a combination of rhythm, condoms, and withdrawal. I've never used oral contraceptives. I have four children and all except the first were conceived when I wanted to conceive them. That being said, I've always had a very, very regular menstrual cycle and knew when in the cycle ovulation normally occurred - ie I listened in biology class. ;-)

link|flag
0

Look up Natural Family Planning. It's not the rhythm method of old. It's highly effective when followed. Couples who use it also report better, and more frequent sexual encounters. It also works as a means to get pregnant with high accuracy.

link|flag

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.