Blog

5

2

What are the obesity hypotheses, who are the proponents/authors and optionally what are their best works on the subject? Which hypothesis/hypotheses do you subscribe to?

Compiled version:

Carbohydrate / Insulin Hypothesis - Gary Taubes

Good Calories Bad Calories
Why We Get Fat

The Food Reward Hypothesis - Stephan Guyenet

http://wholehealthsource.blogspot.com/2011/10/case-for-food-reward-hypothesis-of.html

Multipart series on his blog.

Hypothalamic Hypothesis of Obesity - Todd Becker

http://gettingstronger.org/2011/11/obesity-starts-in-the-brain-2/

Obesity System Influence via the UK's Tackling Obesities project. Thank You Beth-WeightMaven for the below chart and info.

Awesome Diagram Report

alt text

Calories in, Calories out - Colpo

Malnourishment - Paul Jaminet

http://perfecthealthdiet.com/?p=5387

Microbe theory of metabolic syndrome

http://flare8.net/health/doku.php/diseases#microbes1 (reference sources therein):

Excitotoxin theory of obesity likely traced to: Dr. Blaylock

http://www.rense.com/general79/obesity.htm

Child Inactivity

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2424024/

flag
I didn't edit your post, but I would point out that the plural of hypothesis is hypotheses. – Agentzero Feb 7 2012 at 21:28
Thank you! I have updated the question. – Eric Feb 7 2012 at 22:16
here's a question within a question - isn't there an overlap between the carb theory and the reward theory seeing how carbs excites our pleasure center in the brain? – justin Feb 9 2012 at 16:19
Could be... Carbs can really up the reward scale... – Eric Feb 10 2012 at 4:47

9 Answers

9

Obesity System Influence via the UK's Tackling Obesities project.

alt text

link|flag
Wow! That is some amazing work. – Austin Feb 7 2012 at 15:19
Very Cool Beth!!! – Eric Feb 7 2012 at 15:53
@Beth, show off! :-)) – Nance Feb 7 2012 at 16:41
1 
You have to click on the link. The chart has mouse over features. Very Cool! – Eric Feb 7 2012 at 17:14
1 
LOL Nance ;). While I think it's worth listing and considering various hypotheses, I ultimately believe obesity is a 'wicked problem' ... "a problem that is difficult or impossible to solve because of incomplete, contradictory, and changing requirements that are often difficult to recognize." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_problem – Beth-WeightMaven Feb 7 2012 at 17:30
show 1 more comment
4

Microbe theory of metabolic syndrome, via http://flare8.net/health/doku.php/diseases#microbes1 (reference sources therein):

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) has microbes:

17% of morbidly obese have small intestinal bacterial overgrowth syndrome 182) and circulating LPS (a type of endotoxin) is 76% higher in type 2 diabetics compared to controls 183). Herpes simplex 1 (a virus) concentrations correlate with percentage fat mass 184). HSV-2 is negatively associated with insulin sensitivity after controlling for BMI, age, and CRP 185). Genetically obese (leptin deficient) mice have enhanced intestinal permeability which leads to increased endotoxin levels 186). The microbiota of type 2 diabetic mice 187) and obese mice 188) and humans 189) 190) 191) are significantly different from their lean counterparts.

Inundation with microbes cause MetS:

Mice deficient in certain immune-fighting functions have altered gut flora and develop metabolic syndrome 192).

Transferring an obese mouse's gut flora to germ-free mice causes obesity in the colonized mice 193) 194).

Microbe actions can cause MetS:

In ob/ob mice, blocking or enhancing CB1 can cause an 88% decrease or 100% increase in plasma LPS, respectively, likely via modulation of gut barrier function. CB1 expression in mice can be decreased -25% by prebiotics, -60% by antibiotics, and increased 160% by a 'high fat' lab diet (but only by 60% if the HFD includes prebiotics) 195). Altering mice gut microbiotas via prebiotics and probiotics can significantly modulate intestinal permeability 196) 197).

  • CB1 receptor knockout mice: protected from diet-induced obesity, despite similar caloric intakes as mice who do become obese 198) 199).
  • CB1 blocker in diet-induced obese mice: -50% reduction in adiposity, correction of insulin resistance and lowered plasma leptin levels 200) 201).
  • CB1 blocker in obese monkeys: -23% reduction in food intake, bodyfat by -39%, leptin by -34% (pair fed animals did not experience improvements) 202).
  • CB1 blocker in humans: 4.7 kg greater weight loss over 1 year, compared to placebo 203).

The CB1 receptor can significantly modulate drug and palatable food seeking behavior in mice 204) 205) 206), including sugar 207) 208), chocolate 209), 'emotional behavior' 210), anxiety, stress and depressive-like behavior 211). CB1 blocking reduces reward seeking in rats 212) 213). CB1 receptors are densely expressed in neurons expressing dopamine D1 receptors 214).

Continuously injecting lipopolysaccharid (LPS) into mice, at levels that mimic the endotoxemia seen in metabolic-syndrome mice, causes glucose levels, insulin levels, and weight gain similar to 'high-fat' fed mice 215). Continuous LPS can cause insulin resistance in cats 216). A single LPS injection can cause a 100% increase in serum leptin levels and 44% increase in triglycerides 217).

Inflammation within adipose tissue occurs during obesity 218), and interrupting this inflammation prevents metabolic abnormalities 219). Continuously injecting humans with endotoxin can cause a 35% decline in insulin sensitivity, and increases adipose tissue inflammation 220) 221). Low doses of endotoxin in many ways dramatically increase inflammation in humans 222) 223) 224) 225).

"In conclusion…we found that metabolic concentrations of plasma LPS are a sufficient molecular mechanism for triggering the high-fat diet–induced metabolic diseases obesity/diabetes." 226)

Alleviating microbes ameliorates MetS:

Mice lacking LPS detectors resist both LPS and 'high-fat' diet-induced metabolic syndrome 227) 228) 229).

In two different mouse models of insulin resistance, antibiotic treatment caused a -36% decrease in plasma LPS and a significant -18% to -42% decrease in glucose levels 230), and effectively reverses metabolic syndrome in ob/ob and diet-induced obese mice, despite increased food intake 231) 232).

Germ free mice fed a 'high fat' lab diet are resistant to diet-induced obesity 233) 234) 235).

Other microbes:

  • "four viruses have been reported to induce obesity (infectoobesity) in animal models (chickens, mice, sheep, goat, dogs, rats and hamsters)… In a series of papers over the last ten years, however, the group of Prof. Dhurandhar (Pennington Biomedical Research Center, LA, USA) demonstrated that a human adenovirus, adenovirus-36 (Ad-36), is capable of inducing adiposity in experimentally infected chickens, mice and non-human primates (marmosets). Ad-36 is known to increase the replication, differentiation, lipid accumulation and insulin sensitivity in fat cells and reduces those cells' leptin secretion and expression. It also affects human primary preadipocytes. In rats increased adiposity was observed due to Ad-36 infection. Recent studies have shown that, in the USA, antibodies to Ad-36 were more prevalent in obese subjects (30%) than in non-obese subjects (11%)." 236)
  • "This review discusses the 5 animal viruses and 3 human viruses that have been shown to cause obesity… The first 4 viruses attack the central nervous system to produce obesity. SMAM-1, an avian adenovirus from India, acts directly on adipocytes and is the only animal virus that is associated with human obesity. The 3 human adenoviruses, adenovirus (Ad) 36, Ad-37, and Ad-5, that are associated with obesity also affect adipocytes directly. These viruses stimulate enzymes and transcription factors that cause accumulation of triglycerides and differentiation of preadipocytes into mature adipocytes. Ad-5 and Ad-37 have been shown to cause obesity in animals. Ad-36 has been studied the most and is the only human adenovirus to date that has been linked with human obesity. Ad-36 causes obesity in chickens, mice, rats, and monkeys and was present in 30% of obese humans and 11% of nonobese humans. In twins discordant for infection with Ad-36, the infected twins were heavier and fatter than their cotwins. The growing body of evidence demonstrating that viruses produce human obesity supports the concept that at least some of the worldwide epidemic of obesity in the past 25 years is due to viral infections." 237)
  • "We previously reported that human adenovirus Ad-36 induces adiposity… To evaluate the transmissibility of Ad-36 and Ad-36 induced adiposity using a chicken model… As seen in experiment 1, Ad-36 infection can be transmitted horizontally from an infected chicken to another chicken sharing the cage. Additionally, experiment 2 demonstrated blood-borne transmission of Ad-36-induced adiposity in chickens. Transmissibility of Ad-36-induced adiposity in chicken model raises serious concerns about such a possibility in humans that needs further investigation." 238)
  • "cross-sectional study of children 8 to 18 years… A total of 124 children (median age: 13.6 years) were studied. Of those children, 46% were nonobese and 54% were obese. AD36 positivity was present in 19 children (15%). The majority of children found to be AD36-positive were obese (15 [78%] of 19 children). AD36 positivity was significantly (P<.05) more frequent in obese children (15 [22%] of 67 children) than nonobese children (4 [7%] of 57 children). Among the subset of children who were obese, those who were AD36-positive had significantly larger anthropometric measures, including weight, BMI, waist circumference, and waist/height ratio. " 239)
  • "CDV was reported as the first obesity-promoting pathogen in 1982 when Lyons et al[15] published the landmark article in Science, “A virally induced obesity syndrome in mice” that reported that CDV infection induced obesity in Swiss Albino mice. CDV-inoculated mice showed increased body weight as well as an increased number and size of fat cells[15]. Anatomical damage and altered neurochemistry in the hypothalamus was subsequently demonstrated in CDV-infected mice[16-21]. The hypothalamus plays a well-documented role in appetite regulation, energy consumption and neuroendocrine function[18]. CDV-infected mice showed down-regulated leptin receptors in the hypothalamic area of the brain, explaining their inability to generate a proper response to leptin in the brain[18]. With lower number of leptin receptors, hunger may be induced despite high leptin plasma levels that signal satiety. RAV-7, an avian leukosis virus, was the second microbe reported to induce obesity. RAV-7 (avian leukosis virus subgroup C) is the most common poultry retrovirus associated with neoplastic disease[23]. RAV-7 causes obesity in chickens combined with growth stunting, hypertriglycemia, hypercholesterolemia as well as enlarged fatty liver, anemia and immunosuppression[23]" 240)
link|flag
Thank You Free!!! – Eric Feb 7 2012 at 19:28
thanks for posting free, this was interesting to read. I wonder how many people have had the obesity related viruses? – Joy Feb 8 2012 at 16:00
2

Are there any theories that take into account Grehlin, Leptin, Insulin, Thyroid Hormones and Cortisol? I may be missing a few as well, but I think they all work in concert for fat storage. I have never heard of Todd Becker's theory, so I will have to check that out.

link|flag
There's a thread about Todd: paleohacks.com/questions/79545/… – Nance Feb 7 2012 at 16:44
I assume the hippothalmus controls the pituitary gland. If this were to become inflamed, it would affect all hormones mentioned and most of the endocrine system as well. – primallykosher Feb 10 2012 at 5:05
2

Malnourishment - Paul Jaminet http://perfecthealthdiet.com/?p=5387

link|flag
Thank You PG!!! – Eric Feb 7 2012 at 18:48
2

I favor the excitotoxin theory of obesity, which I suppose would be traced back to Dr. Blaylock: http://www.rense.com/general79/obesity.htm

link|flag
Fascinating! But apparently there's some recovery possible since leptin resistance does seem recoverable in some people at least (me.) – Nance Feb 7 2012 at 22:38
Thanks Travis! Another plus for breast feeding. – Eric Feb 8 2012 at 4:15
2

I include this, not because the researchers are leaders in obesity theory, but because there are so many working in this area:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2424024/

Childhood inactivity is a direct cause of obesity. Once the problem is created it's hard to reverse.

link|flag
Thank You thhq!!! – Eric Feb 8 2012 at 4:16
A year later, looking at Eric's compilation above, I'd pick reward and childhood inactivity. Both cultural. I was taught to make and enjoy rewarding foods, and always considered sitting in front of a TV more enjoyable than going outside and being active. CICO was the furthest thing from my mind when I was obese, but I eventually used it to reverse my obesity. CICO put numbers on my cultural derangements. – thhq Mar 16 at 13:30
2

Carb/insulin, calories in/calories out, AND food reward.

link|flag
Thank You Steve Parker MD!!! – Eric Feb 8 2012 at 16:07
2

Dietary replacement... http://www.johnberardi.com/articles/nutrition/dietary_1.htm

link|flag
1

Calories in, Calories out - Colpo

link|flag
Thanks Peter!!! – Eric Feb 7 2012 at 15:53
1 
I mean it is ALL CICO at the end of the day but is Colpo's theory that it's a conscious decision to swing the balance one way or the other? – sarah-ann Feb 7 2012 at 19:27
I havent read his book yet, so I'm not 100% sure of his theory yet. I'm just going off his blog. – peter Feb 7 2012 at 22:15
Also, i'm not sure that it is all CICO. A lot of the low carb writers such as Taubes claim that you can pretty much eat at will as long as it is low carb. – peter Feb 7 2012 at 22:18
1 
@peter it is discouraging to see hucksters distort the central truth of LC - a low calorie satiating diet - into something that magically turns thermodynamics on its head. All to sell more books, prepackaged foods and dietary supplements. The real magic is in how they tease money out of pocketbooks. – thhq Feb 9 2012 at 13:08
show 3 more comments

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.