I was recently asked for evidence beyond blogs or opinion pieces on the problems with omega 3/6 ratios and how important they are. I have read that o3 isn't all that important and supplementing is unnecessary. I have searched Pubmed but nothing helpful came up. Has anybody any evidence for the inflammatory harm of omega 6 (again not blog posts unless backed by peer-reviewed studies) and the importance of the 3/6 ratio of 1:1 so often quoted?
|
5
|
http://jn.nutrition.org/content/131/4/1125.full The data suggest that the most important aspect of PUFA in the prevention of mammary cancer is the ratio of (n-3) to (n-6) PUFA rather than the absolute concentration of either. Research indicates that a ratio of ∼1:1–1:2 has the most protective effect against the development and growth of mammary cancers. If this is indeed the case, a closer look at human and animal diets, whose (n-3)-to-(n-6) average ratio is considerably higher (∼1:20 and 1:10, respectively) (8 ,43) , may be warranted. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3004387/ Human trials confirmed that LC n-3 PUFA from either fish or fish oil supplements as well as ALA enrichment significantly reduce blood triglyceride levels in patients with MetS in a dose-dependent manner [35, 68], an effect that appears to be mediated through inhibition of hormone-sensitive lipase and VLDL secretion, and increase in apo B liver degradation [35]. A body of evidence demonstrates that n-3 PUFA are involved in the control of glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity [69]. In murine models of obesity and insulin resistance, incorporation of LC n-3 PUFA into cell membrane phospholipids increases membrane fluidity and expression, affinity, and number of insulin receptors [58] as well as GLUT-4 protein level in adipocytes [70], thereby improving insulin sensitivity. In overweight patients, n-3 PUFA reduce transition from glucose intolerance to T2DM [29], and fish and fish oil consumption during energy reduction elicit an additional positive effects on insulin resistance [71]. However, a majority of n-3 PUFA administration trials did not prove efficient in reducing insulin resistance in T2DM [29]. Diet interventions with increased n-3 PUFA clearly demonstrated therapeutically, reliability in lowering mortality in subjects with cardiovascular diseases or the MetS [31, 72], an effect primarily related to increased DHA intakes [73]. This justifies the recommendation for daily consumption of 1g/d of LC n-3 PUFA as part of secondary prevention strategy post ischemic heart event [74]. NAFLD, now recognized as the hepatic complication of the MetS, might trigger development of T2DM. Low dietary n-3 PUFA content induces hepatic desaturase activity [75]. In addition, enzymes involved in eicosanoid synthesis are located at the periphery of lipid droplets [76]. It is therefore plausible that in the context of diet- or obesity-induced fatty liver associated with excessive n-6/n-3 ratio, hepatic eicosanoid production is tilted towards proinflammatory components and participates to proinflammatory and insulin resistant status aggravating the MetS. Animal diet-induced obesity experiments clearly show that EPA and DHA supplementation reduces severity of NAFLD, if not preventing it [23], suggesting that increasing n-3 PUFA intake and fish consumption might prevent the occurrence of NAFLD in humans [2]. Properly conducted clinical trials are awaited to confirm this. As important, emerging evidence indicates that incidence and tumour growth of some cancers associated with the MetS can be attenuated by n-3 PUFA [3]. Independently of the total amount of n-3 PUFA, the n-6/n-3 ratio seems to be determinant as a ratio of 2.5/1 reduced rectal cell proliferation in patients with colorectal cancer, whereas a ratio of 4/1 with the same amount of n-3 PUFA had no effect [77]. |
|||||
|
|
2
|
1:1 is often quoted but 2:1 or 3:1 seems more realistic and just as healthy Here are a few other articles http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=7930322
http://www.jlr.org/content/51/8/2352.full.pdf
http://www.jacn.org/content/21/6/495.full
|
|||
|
|
