Blog

show/hide this revision's text 9 added 6 characters in body

I like a little of both I have to say. Sometimes my gut instinct says, 'That was not around in Paleolithic times, so therefore what are we doing to ourselves by eating it/doing it?' and other times I really need the science to tell me WHY?

I am not a scientist nor a scholar, I am a mother who has been searching for a very long time for a better way to 'be'. Sometimes it feels like groping around in the dark, like trial and error and the science - in some cases - can be really contradictory and confusing, like 'information overload' when I get into heavy research about something.

In light of this, I like to keep up with what people are saying about it, through discussions like these. Sometimes it can make things just a little clearer and hanging out at a place like this means that I can pick up snippets of layman's science and listen to other people's experiences too. I think reading what other people have been through is sometimes just as valuable as scientific evidence. Together they are a powerful combination and when the experience gets backed up by science, well then that is the EUREKA! moment.

I guess I won't try anything new until I have read at least some scientific evidence on the topic, some anecdotal evidence (discussion or opinion) and some historical /anthropological evidence about how pre-industrialized/agriculturalized people lived. I have to admit that it is the actual historical evidence that usually helps me make my final decision as to whether I accept it the hypothesis or not.

But then, I guess it makes sense that after all this I always listen to the last and most important judge - my body - in the form of emotional and/or physical gut feelings. My body is where the buck stops, regardless of science, history or word-of-mouth - period.

show/hide this revision's text 8 added 144 characters in body; added 107 characters in body; added 37 characters in body; [made Community Wiki]

I like a little of both I have to say. Sometimes my gut instinct says, 'That was not around in Paleolithic times, so therefore what are we doing to ourselves by eating it/doing it?' and other times I really need the science to tell me WHY?

I am not a scientist nor a scholar, I am a mother who has been searching for a very long time for a better way to 'be'. Sometimes it feels like groping around in the dark, like trial and error and the science - in some cases - can be really contradictory and confusing, like 'information overload' when I get into heavy research about something.

In light of this, I like to keep up with what people are saying about it, through discussions like these. Sometimes it can make things just a little clearer and hanging out at a place like this means that I can pick up snippets of layman's science and listen to other people's experiences too. I think reading what other people have been through is sometimes just as valuable as scientific evidence. Together they are a powerful combination and when the experience gets backed up by science, well then that is the EUREKA! moment.

But then, I listen to the last and most important judge, my body. She is where the buck stops.

I guess I won't try anything new until I have read at least some scientific evidence on the topic, some anecdotal evidence (discussion or opinion) and some historical /anthropological evidence about what may how pre-industrialized/agriculturalized people lived. I have been happening to admit that it is the actual historical evidence that usually helps me make my final decision as to whether I accept it or not.

But then, I guess it makes sense that I listen to the last and most important judge - my body - in Paleolithic timesthe form of emotional and/or physical gut feelings. My body is where the buck stops, regardless of science, history or word-of-mouth - period.

show/hide this revision's text 7 deleted 150 characters in body

I like a little of both I have to say. Sometimes my gut instinct says, 'That was not around in Paleolithic times, so therefore what are we doing to ourselves by eating it/doing it?' and other times I really am intrigued as need the science to tell me WHYsomething has that effect or other.?

I am not a scientist nor a scholar, I am a mother who has been searching for a very long time for a better way to 'be'. Sometimes it feels like groping around in the dark, like trial and error and I don't need the science behind the practice - in some cases - can be really contradictory and confusing, meaning that if it is like 'talked aboutinformation overload' enough, I will give it a try.

Of course, other symptoms are far more stealthy and creep up on you over time, so mostly when I get a general feeling of unease, when I know into heavy research about somethingis not right.

In light of this, I get onto the internet and research like hell. It is then that I want the scientific studies to tell me what is going on. They become very important indeed. Most of the time this is achieved by reading keep up with what is being discussed on health sites on the internet.

In additionpeople are saying about it, through discussions like these. Sometimes it can make things just a little clearer and hanging out at a place like this means that I can pick up snippets of layman's science and listen to other people's experiences too. I think reading what other people have been through is sometimes just as valuable as scientific evidence. Together they are a powerful combination . And and when the experience gets backed up by science, well then that is the EUREKA! moment.

So I guess I have a four-pronged attack: I find out if it was done back in Paleolithic times

But then, I listen to the last and most important judge, my body, . She is where the buck stops.

I research for guess I won't try anything new until I have read at least some scientific evidence on the topic, some anecdotal evidence (discussion or opinion) and I hang around with people who know more some historical /anthropological evidence about it than I do....what may have been happening in Paleolithic times.

;)

show/hide this revision's text 6 deleted 212 characters in body
show/hide this revision's text 5 deleted 67 characters in body; deleted 160 characters in body
show/hide this revision's text 4 deleted 55 characters in body
show/hide this revision's text 3 deleted 340 characters in body; added 12 characters in body; added 73 characters in body
show/hide this revision's text 2 added 328 characters in body
show/hide this revision's text 1