Blog

show/hide this revision's text 9 added 155 characters in body; edited body

I wonder why is it that some people who are very concerned with fructose do accept vegetables as sweet potatoes or beets whose sugar content is high and is mostly sucrose...

Am I missing something?

Yes, you're missing the fact that sweet potatoes have less fructose than almost all fruits.

You have to look at the actual numbers.

To calculate the total amount of fructose, we add half the sucrose to the free fructose.

    Sucrose / 2 + free fructose = total fructose

Here's how we apply that formula to sweet potatoes. According to the USDA database, sweet potatoes contain 2.52 g sucrose and 0.70 g free fructose per 100 g. Here's the arithmetic.

    2.52/2 + 0.70 = 1.96

This means sweet potatoes contain 1.96 g of total fructose per 100 g.

This is less total fructose than almost any common fruit. The only common commercial fruits that contain less total fructose are cranberries and limes, and people don't like to eat them because they are sour.

Let's put sweet potatoes in perspective by comparing them with fruits. The numbers show total fructose g per 100 g.

(I didn't include beets because the USDA database doesn't show how much sucrose and fructose they contain.)

    FRUIT         

    FOOD          TOTAL FRUCTOSE
    ----------------------------
    Apricots           3.87
    Apples             6.93
    Bananas            6.04
    Blueberries        5.02
    Cantaloupe         4.04
    Cherries           5.44
    Grapefruit         3.02
    Grapes             8.20
    Kiwi               4.42
    Mangos             7.16
    Papayas            3.73
    Pears              6.62
    Pineapple          5.11
    Raspberries        2.45
    Strawberries       2.73
    Sweet potatoes     SWEET POTATOES     1.96
    Watermelon         3.90

Sweet potatoes don't look so bad now, do they? :)

The reason I didn't mention beets in this answer is because I can't find data anywhere on the web about its sugar composition. (I'm talking about red beets, the kind that people eat. Plenty of info is available about sugar beets, but that's a different thing.)

Source: USDA database

show/hide this revision's text 8 deleted 11 characters in body; added 1 characters in body; [made Community Wiki]

I wonder why is it that some people who are very concerned with fructose do accept vegetables as sweet potatoes or beets whose sugar content is high and is mostly sucrose...

Am I missing something?

Yes, you're missing the fact that sweet potatoes have less totalfructose than almost any fruitall fruits.

You have to look at the actual numbers.

To calculate the total amount of fructose, you can't just look at sucrose. You have to we add half the sucrose to the free fructose.

    Sucrose / 2 + free fructose = total fructose

Here's how we apply that formula to sweet potatoes. According to the USDA database, sweet potatoes contain 2.52 g sucrose and 0.70 g free fructose per 100 g. Here's the arithmetic.

    2.52/2 + 0.70 = 1.96

This means sweet potatoes contain 1.96 g of total fructose per 100 g.

This is less total fructose than almost any common fruit. The only common commercial fruits that contain less total fructose are cranberries and limes, and people don't like to eat them because they are sour.

Let's put sweet potatoes in perspective by comparing them with fruits. The numbers show total fructose g per 100 g.

(I didn't include beets because the USDA database doesn't show how much sucrose and fructose they contain.)

    FRUIT         TOTAL FRUCTOSE
    ----------------------------
    Apricots           3.87
    Apples             6.93
    Bananas            6.04
    Blueberries        5.02
    Cantaloupe         4.04
    Cherries           5.44
    Grapefruit         3.02
    Grapes             8.20
    Kiwi               4.42
    Mangos             7.16
    Papayas            3.73
    Pears              6.62
    Pineapple          5.11
    Raspberries        2.45
    Strawberries       2.73
    Sweet potatoes     1.96
    Watermelon         3.90

Sweet potatoes don't look so bad now, do they? :)

Source: USDA database

show/hide this revision's text 7 edited body; added 33 characters in body

I wonder why is it that some people who are very concerned with fructose do accept vegetables as sweet potatoes or beets whose sugar content is high and is mostly sucrose...

Am I missing something?

Yes, you're missing the fact that sweet potatoes have less total fructose than almost any fruit.

To calculate the total amount of fructose, you can't just look at sucrose. You have to add half the sucrose to the free fructose.

    Sucrose / 2 + free fructose = total fructose

Here's how we apply that formula to sweet potatoes. According to the USDA database, sweet potatoes contain 2.52 g sucrose and 0.70 g free fructose per 100 g. Here's the arithmetic.

    2.52/2 + 0.70 = 1.96

This means sweet potatoes contain 1.96 g of total fructose per 100 g.

This is less total fructose than almost any common fruit. The only common commercial fruits that contain less total fructose are cranberries and limes, and people don't like to eat them because they are sour.

Let's put sweet potatoes in perspective by comparing them with fruits. The numbers show total fructose g per 100 g.

(I didn't include beets because the USDA database doesn't show how much sucrose and fructose they contain.)

    FRUIT         TOTAL FRUCTOSE
    ----------------------------
    Apricots           3.87
    Apples             6.93
    Bananas            6.04
    Blueberries        5.02
    Cantaloupe         4.04
    Cherries           5.44
    Grapefruit         3.02
    Grapes             8.20
    Kiwi               4.42
    Mangos             7.16
    Papayas            3.73
    Pears              6.62
    Pineapple          5.38
    5.11
    Raspberries        2.45
    Strawberries       2.73
    Sweet potatoes     1.96
    Watermelon         3.90

Sweet potatoes don't look so bad now, do they? :)

Source: USDA database

show/hide this revision's text 6 added 33 characters in body; added 33 characters in body; added 33 characters in body; added 33 characters in body; added 33 characters in body
show/hide this revision's text 5 added 47 characters in body; added 8 characters in body; added 3 characters in body
show/hide this revision's text 4 added 108 characters in body
show/hide this revision's text 3 added 99 characters in body
show/hide this revision's text 2 added 30 characters in body; added 34 characters in body; added 30 characters in body
show/hide this revision's text 1