I'll stick with my original answer to yesterday's thread, namely that I read a wide variety of websites and other publications then ponder the information to develop and focus my own thoughts. I'm not close enough to any of these people to make absolute judgments and I am pretty sure they're all mixtures of correct and accidentally incorrect statements in their work and their beliefs. I do get suspicious of anyone who dismisses counter evidence rather than re-working/thinking his/her previous pronouncements.